Eco News

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Weigh in on drilling the Ranch

Posted by J. Adrian Stanley on Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:02 PM

Colorado Springs is a new area for oil and gas drilling.
The city government may not be able to stop oil and gas drilling, or even control it very much.

But there's still an opportunity for Colorado Springs to exercise some control over an industry that's gone hog wild in other communities, leading to environmental degradation and health concerns.

The city is still formulating its response to the apparent boom that's about to hit the former Banning Lewis Ranch housing development site on the city's north side. And the good news is that elected officials want the public to weigh in.

Take them up on the offer, especially if you live near the drilling site.

City seeking public input on options for oil and gas regulations

The city will host a public meeting on Thursday, May 24 from 6-8 p.m. at the City Administration Building (30 S. Nevada Ave.), suite 102 to get public input on proposed options for local oil and gas regulations.

City staff, elected officials, and Oil and Gas Committee members will be available to answer questions and record feedback on proposed levels of regulation for oil and gas exploration and development within city limits. The input will be considered by the voting members of the Oil and Gas Committee, who will deliver recommendations to City Council on June 12 for formal Council direction. The City Attorney’s Office will draft the regulations, which will then be presented to Council for approval later this summer.

The Oil and Gas Committee was appointed by City Council in January and met over the course of 14 weeks to learn about oil and gas exploration and production, as well as review state and local regulations. Three council members – Val Snider, Brandy Williams and Angela Dougan - served on the committee as voting members with the responsibility to bring forward recommendations on areas and levels of local regulation. The areas identified for regulation are: adherence to the pre-application/site plan process; impact fees; water quality compliance; land use setbacks; operational conflict avoidance language; zoning districts for oil and gas; high density/low density considerations; and conditions of Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) operator approvals for city government.

Handouts will be available following the meeting on the City’s Oil and Gas Committee webpage at www.springsgov.com. Public comment can also be submitted through the webpage or via email at OilandGasCommittee@springsgov.com.
###

Tags: , , , ,

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Passing the buck at Fort Carson

Posted by Pam Zubeck on Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:09 PM

Fort Carson Colorado Springs
  • Grosso: It's his hot potato now.

You know what they say: Timing is everything. And in the case of Col. Robert McLaughlin, former garrison commander at Fort Carson, he got out of the kitchen just in time.

As we recently reported, a lot of people in southeastern Colorado aren't happy about the Army's ambitions in bringing in a 113-helicopter Combat Aviation Brigade to Fort Carson in Colorado Springs and the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site.

Today, on the eve of making decision on the environmental impact of the CAB, McLaughlin shook the post's dirt off his boots and split town.

Here's the release:

Col. Robert F. McLaughlin will transfer command of U.S. Army Garrison Fort Carson to Col. David L. Grosso during a change of command ceremony Thursday at 11 a.m. at Founders Field.

McLaughlin assumed command of U.S. Army Garrison Fort Carson on June 30, 2009. He is leaving to deploy to Afghanistan, where he will serve as the chief of staff for U.S. Forces.

Grosso currently serves at Fort Carson as the deputy commander of the 10th Special Forces Group (Airborne). His past assignments have included stints as Deputy Commander, 1st Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, and Director, Village Stability National Coordination Center, Combined Special Operations Component Command-Afghanistan.

During his tenure at Fort Carson, McLaughlin was instrumental in improving resiliency resources for Soldiers and Families and leading the garrison through a record growth in population and services.

No mention that McLaughlin was always represented as the decision guy on whether to accept the Environmental Assessment finding of no significant impact (FONSI) or order a more in-depth Environmental Impact Statement, as demanded by numerous residents and elected officials in the areas of the PCMS.

Like they also say: Oh well, now it's somebody else's problem.

Tags: , ,

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Fracking ban, two new studies and other news

Posted by Pam Zubeck on Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:21 PM

There's a few things happening on the oil and gas drilling front, so here's the update:

Oil and gas drilling Colorado Springs

Business students at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs are ready to unveil their findings about whether drilling will be good or bad for El Paso County.

The study, conducted by 25 master's level business students, will be released at 4:45 p.m. Friday in Dwire Hall 121 on the UCCS campus, the university said in a press release. The meeting is open to the public and parking is free.

The comprehensive project researched environmental impact, economic impact, and oil and gas profitability in the county.
“Successful energy exploration and development could create hundreds of well-paying jobs, diversify the tax base, and increase local GDP by as much as 5 percent,” Fred Crowley, senior instructor, College of Business, and associate director of the Southern Colorado Economic Forum, said Crowley said oil and gas exploration could provide a more than $1 billion boost to the local economy. “The challenge for us is, how do we capture those jobs and incomes plus the jobs and incomes of the related service industries that don’t even exist here yet?” Crowley said.
The students have invited public and private decision makers to the presentation in the hope that their research will aid in the decision making process as local governments and business organizations grapple with policymaking related to the emergence of this industry.

Meantime, Vermont last week became the first state in the nation to ban hydraulic fracturing, the use of water, sand and chemicals to break open oil and gas deposits so they can be more economically extracted. More on that is here.

In a related matter, Mary Talbott, a local resident who has remained ever vigilant to new developments in the oil and gas industry, sends us this link about companies writing deals with residents that contain non-disclosure agreements. See that story on truth-out.org here

Here's an excerpt from that story, which also reports that the environmental group Earthjustice contends some of these secret agreements have been made in Colorado.

Besides air emissions standards recently introduced by the Environmental Protection Agency, fracking remains largely unregulated by the federal government and has been linked to earthquakes and air and water contamination across the country. Fracking companies disclose some of the chemicals used in fracking fluid, but others - and their concentrations - are often exempt from disclosure because they are considered trade secrets. Other exemptions buried in state and federal law allow drillers to avoid disclosing contents of fracking fluids after they return from deep underground.

Dr. Jerome Paulson, a physician and director of Mid-Atlantic Center for Children's Health and the Environment, said that the fracking industry has told the public that the drilling procedure is safe, so there is no reason to hide information on health impacts from public view. Nondisclosure agreements with private landowners and disclosure exemptions, Paulson said, are preventing doctors from doing their jobs and protecting the public.

"How do we provide appropriate treatment recommendations to who are ill?" Paulson asked during a press conference last week. "For the population of individuals who are healthy, how do we provide prevention recommendations when we don't have the information?"

University of Colorado at Colorado Springs

Lastly, the Western Energy Alliance, a nonprofit advocacy group for the drilling industry, is upbeat about a new study "which highlights the adverse impacts of public lands policies on jobs, investment, and state revenue."

Here's more:

Economic Impacts of Oil & Gas Development on Federal lands in the West, prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants, details the huge economic impact of 22 oil and natural gas projects proposed in the West. Collectively, these projects could create 120,905 jobs, $8 billion in wages, $27.5 billion in economic activity, and $139 million in government revenue every year. The total economic impact of these 22 projects over their anticipated 10-15 year lifespan is $383.5 billion.

In the federal oil and natural gas process, companies are responsible for proposing projects, and the Bureau of Land Management or the Forest Service is responsible for completing the environmental analysis required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Development, and the resulting jobs and economic growth, cannot proceed until the government completes the NEPA analysis.

“Government delays during the environmental analysis phase are preventing significant job creation and economic activity,” said Kathleen Sgamma, Vice President of Government and Public Affairs. “If we look at projects outstanding for three years, which represent about 1,631 wells per year, we see that federal government delays are preventing the creation of 64,805 jobs, $4.3 billion in wages, and $14.9 billion in economic impact every year.

“Our members, especially the small independent businesses who are the backbone of the western economy, know first-hand how difficult it is to operate on public lands. Federal policies discourage domestic oil and natural gas production, and put the West at a disadvantage compared to other regions of the country without a preponderance of public lands. This study provides hard evidence of how bureaucratic delays are adversely affecting small businesses and working families,” said Sgamma.

Tags: , , ,

Thursday, April 26, 2012

SunShare signs deal with D-11

Posted by Pam Zubeck on Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:59 AM

A local company started by a Colorado College grad has inked a deal with Colorado Springs School District 11 to build a solar garden on D-11 land.

SunShare built the Colorado Springs Community Solar Garden, the first public-private partnership of its kind in the nation, at Venetucci Farm last year. It has 300 households and schools as subscribers, and is subscribing a second project.

The D-11 deal was approved by the school board Wednesday night.

Here's SunShare's press release about it:

In another move for national firsts, SunShare announces its partnership with Colorado Springs School District 11 to build its next community solar garden. The project will be the first of its kind in the nation to be built in conjunction with a public school.

David Amster-Olszewski: Growing a business.
  • The Independent
  • David Amster-Olszewski: Growing a business.

The 2,500-panel solar garden will be built on a previously unusable piece of D-11 land located north of McAuliffe Elementary School. Its south-facing slope was unsuitable for school expansion, but is perfect for solar. Construction will begin this summer, and is expected to be complete before school resumes in the fall.

The solar garden is already 90% sold out to homeowners and schools across El Paso County, and will provide carbon-free energy for the District, helping to offset over $100,00 of their utility costs in the first 20 years. Each solar panel lease costs $550, with 10 panels powering 50% of the average Colorado Springs home, saving over $10,000 in rising electricity costs. The whole project will save Colorado Springs’ families $2.5 million over 20 years.

In return for the land, SunShare will pay the school district a combination of cash and solar panels, feeding power directly into the school, and saving the district money on it's electric bills for the next 30-50 years.

"Responsible energy management is a key focus for District 11 as we work to demonstrate fiscal prudence and financial responsibility. This partnership with SunShare will help our district recognize energy savings, while allowing both organizations to maintain high levels of organizational social responsibility," says District 11 Deputy Superintendent Glenn Gustafson.

“We are thrilled to be working with the District on this community solar garden. Together we can bring more solar energy to more households in the community, in a location that facilitates learning about the importance of renewable resources,” says SunShare founder and CEO David Amster-Olszewski.

Started in Colorado Springs, community solar gardens are gaining legislative traction in states across the country, including California, Texas, Maryland, Delaware, New York, and 8 others.

Tags: , , ,

Thursday, April 12, 2012

County eyes second phase of water study

Posted by Pam Zubeck on Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:48 PM

El Paso County is moving forward with its attempt to find out more about groundwater supplies in the eastern part of the county where thousands of residents rely on groundwater from private wells or municipal governments.

Screen_shot_2012-04-12_at_4.24.32_PM.png

If you want to be part of that effort, show up at the Board of County Commissioners meeting next Thursday, April 26, at Centennial Hall, 200 S. Cascade Ave. That's when the county's Groundwater Quality Study Committee will have a work session with commissioners to discuss the study, which is aimed at broadening "understanding of water quality issues that affect human health, land development potential and development of future water supplies," the county says in a press release.

The groundwater study session immediately follows the regular board meeting, which begins at 9 a.m.

From the release:

Committee members will share information on the recently-completed proposal and scope of work for Phase 2 of the Groundwater Quality Study, continuing the investigation that started in 2009 of the alluvial aquifer of the Upper Black Squirrel Creek Basin. Committee members will provide information on how the study would benefit the community and will present a multi-year funding proposal and work plan to the Board.

The Groundwater Quality Study Committee was established by the Board of County Commissioners in 2009 because of growing concerns about groundwater quality and potential land use impacts. The Committee consists of the County, special districts, the Upper Black Squirrel Creek Groundwater Management District, representatives from development and agricultural communities, nongovernmental organizations and at-large members. This diverse group, representing a broad cross section of the community, has worked collaboratively for several years to complete Phase 1 of the study, an evaluation of existing groundwater quality data (available HERE), and to prepare a scope of work and funding package for Phase 2. Phase 2 would be led by the U. S. Geological Survey in coordination with the Committee and will take several years to complete. Water quality sampling, testing and analysis are proposed.

The public is welcome to attend. For more information on the April 26 work session, contact Community Services Department Planning Manager Elaine Kleckner at 520-6999 or email elainekleckner@elpasoco.com.

Tags: ,

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Hickenlooper: We have to conserve, for us and the Western Slope

Posted by Debbie Kelley on Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:05 PM

After congratulating Colorado College students Tuesday on the completion of an intensive research project on the Colorado River Basin, Gov. John Hickenlooper clarified a remark attributed to him in 2003, when he was elected mayor of Denver.

The remark: Denver wouldn’t be Denver without Western Slope river water. Hickenlooper said what he meant was that all Front Range cities, also including Colorado Springs, Pueblo and Fort Collins, benefit if everyone uses less water. Because by keeping more water on the Western Slope and using less in urbanized areas, not only do skiing, white-water rafting and other tourism businesses succeed, but so do the ranchers and farmers.

“There’s a direct benefit here. A home on the Front Range is worth more than a home in Kansas City or Indianapolis,” he said.

On the heels of addressing the Global New Energy Summit at The Broadmoor earlier Tuesday, Hickenlooper breezed into Colorado College to deliver a brief speech on “Managing Colorado’s Water for Future Generations.”

The presentation was part of the college’s annual State of the Rockies Project Conference, held Monday and Tuesday. This year’s findings: Unless actions are taken now, the demand for Colorado River water in a few decades will far exceed the dwindling supply.

The key, in the governor’s mind, to saving the Colorado River Basin from becoming a mere trickle instead of a mighty force as a result of climate change and competing water rights interests?

Conservation.

“We know, in the next 40 years, somewhere around 4 to 5 million more people will be in Colorado, and we know that there’s no single silver bullet for this challenge,” Hickenlooper said. “We’re not going to develop our way out of this crisis any more than we can conserve our way out of this crisis. Bigger, better dams aren’t the ultimate solution; we can do more with less. We’ve cut Denver water consumption by 20 percent since 2002.”

Hickenlooper says he advocates new creative ways of saving water and a commitment from every resident to do so. Front Range utilities companies now use about 60 percent of the water that originates in the upper Colorado River basin.

“A lot of it is our own self-motivation or discipline," Hickenlooper said. "How we make it joyful and give people a kick out of it? I think that’s where the youth come in. If we can find ways of using that combination of youthful exuberance and optimism and technology, we have the formal framework to achieve changes.”

Hickenlooper also praised his Colorado River Cooperative Agreement, which he helped create last year between stakeholders in the Denver area and on the Western Slope to improve management of future water projects.

But it does not address two additional proposed diversion projects that would further deplete the river. And unlike U.S. Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar, who spoke at CC’s conference on Monday, Hickenlooper did not mention the potential impact of oil shale development on the river, which some in Congress are pushing for, including U.S. Rep. Doug Lamborn of Colorado Springs.

  • Governor says there's no "magic bullet" for dealing with Colorado's growth in the decades to come.

Tags: , , , ,

U.S., Mexico working on Colorado River allocation, Salazar says

Posted by Debbie Kelley on Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:39 AM

Ken Salazar
  • Ken Salazar

Environmental heavyweight Ken Salazar stopped by his old stomping grounds of Colorado College on Monday evening to weigh in on students’ findings that the Colorado River Basin is in danger of severe water shortages in coming years if preventive steps aren’t taken soon.

As President Obama’s appointed U.S. Secretary of the Interior, the San Luis Valley native and 1977 CC graduate is familiar with the problems associated with what’s often called “the hardest-working river” in the nation.

“The Colorado River is already a water-short river — more water has been allocated than what that river has today, not only along southern states but with the treaty with Mexico,” Salazar said during the 2012 State of the Rockies Project conference, which continues Tuesday.

But Salazar assured the hundreds of conference attendees that his department is working on the issues and hopes to announce a new allocation agreement with Mexico soon.

At the same time that demand for municipal, agricultural, industrial and recreational water use is increasing, supply is decreasing due to drought, rising temperatures and other factors.

The river supplies about 25 million users with drinking water and irrigates 2.5 million acres of farmland, according to Marcia McNutt, director of the U.S. Geological Survey, who also addressed conference goers.

This is the ninth year for CC students to research issues affecting the environmental, social and economic health of the Rocky Mountain region. Since last summer, students have been studying the sustainability of the 1,400-mile Colorado River, which starts in Wyoming, winds through seven southwestern states and flows into Mexico to what’s now a dry delta.

The river is ruled by a compilation of decrees, rights, court decisions and laws that together are referred to as the “Law of the River.” The keystone is the 1922 Colorado River Compact, an interstate agreement for general water allotments, which Salazar said overestimated by 2 million acre feet the annual amount of water that could be extracted from the river.

In response to a question from the audience, Salazar said he doesn’t think the Compact will ever be opened up for negotiation: “The legacies that have been created over 89 years are so embedded in the Law of the River,” he said.

But that doesn’t mean issues such as water shortages, environmental needs, recreational activities and dealing with areas downstream, such as Mexico and the river’s dry delta can’t be solved, he said.

“I’m optimistic no matter how hard these problems are, we can solve any one of these problems,” he said.

Salazar also seized on the connection between the dwindling water supply and the energy industry, deriding the push by U.S. Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colorado Springs, for expanded oil shale development.

“We need to let the world know how much water would be required to develop those oil shale resources — the estimates I’ve seen are over 1 million acre feet and some at 2 million,” Salazar said. “Where would that water come from? What’s going to be the consequences to the ranchers and farmers dependent on the Colorado River?”

Gov. John Hickenlooper will be the keynote speaker at Tuesday’s conference. He will discuss how the natural resource can be managed for future generations. The presentation starts at 11:45 a.m. at Armstrong Hall, 14 E. Cache la Poudre St., on the CC campus. It’s free and open to the public. For the conference schedule, go to http://www2.coloradocollege.edu/stateoftherockies/.

Thursday, April 5, 2012

SunShare hosts party at Venetucci Farm

Posted by Pam Zubeck on Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:18 PM

SunShare owner Dave Amster-Olszewski and Councilor Jan Martin hold shovels at the groundbreaking for SunShares first community solar garden last November. Gov. John Hickenlooper is on the right.
  • SunShare owner Dave Amster-Olszewski and City Councilor Jan Martin hold shovels at the groundbreaking for SunShare's solar garden in November. Gov. John Hickenlooper is on the right.

SunShare is inviting the community to celebrate its community solar garden with a dedication ceremony to coincide with Earth Month.

Joining the home-grown company will be the Catamount Institute, Cool Science, CoPIRG and others at Venetucci Farm from 12:30 to 3 p.m. on Saturday, April 14.

The announcement promises free barbecue, live music and activities for all ages. "If you've leased panels in the Venetucci Garden, be sure to find one of our volunteer tour guides so that you can 'meet and greet' your panels for the first time!" the release says.

Attendees also can help plant the spring onion crop with the Venetucci farmers.

To get there on Interstate 25 going south, take the South Academy Boulevard Exit 135, go east for ½ mile and take the exit for Highway 85 toward Fountain. Then turn right on Highway 85 and go 0.9 mile. The farm is on the right.

But you must register to attend. Do that here.

Tags: , ,

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Nonprofit wins victory over ExxonMobil

Posted by Pam Zubeck on Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:15 PM

Michael Passoff: Wants more disclosure.
  • Photo provided by As You Sow
  • Michael Passoff: Wants more disclosure.

ExxonMobil shareholders will get a crack at a resolution calling for the energy giant to report financial impact on shareholders of hydraulic fracturing, commonly called fracking, thanks to an effort by As You Sow, a nonprofit that promotes environmental and social corporate responsibility through shareholder advocacy.

Well_graphic.png

The organization has submitted a similar resolution for consideration by shareholders of Ultra Petroleum, owner of Ultra Resources, which is the dominant player in the oil and gas scene in El Paso County. So far, the resolution hasn't been adopted by Ultra's shareholders, but As You Sow keeps trying, as we previously reported.

Passoff tells us by phone today that Ultra and ExxonMobil are the only companies that are giving the brush-off to shareholders who care about these issues.

Ultra officials bragged to the city Oil and Gas Committee last month that the company complies with environmental regulations and posts fracking fluids on fracfocus.org.

Ultra controls drilling rights on 137,000 acres of El Paso County, including 18,000 acres of the Banning Lewis Ranch within the city on the east side.

Here's the news release about its recent successful effort:

Just eight weeks before ExxonMobil's annual shareholder meeting, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sided with investors in their battle to address concerns about the energy giant's hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") operations. The shareholder resolution asks ExxonMobil to issue a report on the financial impact to shareowners from the regulatory and community impacts associated with the controversial practice of fracking. On March 28th the SEC rejected ExxonMobil’s request to omit the resolution from its proxy, clearing the path for a vote on the proposal at the company’s annual shareholder meeting on May 30th.

"Community opposition to fracking has grown significantly in recent years, leading to bans, moratoriums, and increased regulatory scrutiny," said Michael Passoff, Senior Strategist at As You Sow, a shareholder advocacy nonprofit that filed the resolution on behalf of the Park Foundation. "Investors need companies to disclose how they are managing these wide-ranging risks."

In response to the shareholder proposal, ExxonMobil argued to the SEC that it had substantially implemented the requests shareholders laid out in their resolution. Deeper research revealed a large gap between information shareholders requested and what ExxonMobil disclosed. According to As You Sow's attorney, Sanford J. Lewis, "ExxonMobil has provided fragmentary and incomplete information on some of the community concerns, does not disclose government enforcement actions as requested by the proposal, and has disclosed far too little analysis useful to investors on the short- and long- term risks posed by these developments."

For example, ExxonMobil's existing reporting focuses heavily on community opposition it faced in just a single town, Southlake, Texas. In actuality, more than 70 towns or cities and at least three states and four countries - including New York, New Jersey, Maryland, Germany, France, Bulgaria, and South Africa - have enacted bans or moratoriums on fracking which can limit drilling operations and materially impact investors' holdings. The company's existing reporting failed to detail where these wide-ranging developments may affects its operations.

The environmental and public health concerns from fracking center around the toxic chemicals used in fracking fluid and the disposal of wastewater; these two critical issues could have significant financial implications for the companies involved, and are contributing to increased regulatory scrutiny. ExxonMobil asserted to the SEC that it had no hydraulic fracturing-related environmental violations. It made this claim by limiting reportable violations to activities detectable deep underground, ignoring impacts occurring near the surface. In fact, in Pennsylvania alone, 156 notices of violations related to natural gas extraction operations where fracking is underway were issued to ExxonMobil or its recently acquired subsidiary, XTO, between 2010 and 2011.

The resolution also asks the company to identify risks to operations or expansion related to water supply limitations. While the company touts its recycling efforts in the Marcellus Shale, in reality its efforts are comparatively minimal. Less than 0.2% of its fluid wastes including drilling, fracking, and produced water from Pennsylvania is recycled by the company, whereas other companies are recycling more than 90% of their wastes.

"Fracking is a major issue of concern for investors and the public," says Jon Jensen, Executive Director of the Park Foundation. "It is critical that we understand how companies are managing the risks to human health and the environment of communities where they operate. As the nation's largest natural gas producer, ExxonMobil needs to set the standard for disclosure on its gas exploration practices and development of safe technology."

Fracking resolutions have received significant support from shareholders since they were first filed in 2010. Last year, the average vote for proposals related to fracking was 40%, which is double the average support for a shareholder vote on environmental or social risks.* Over 15 companies have faced similar resolutions, and many have been withdrawn in exchange for company commitments to shareholders. ExxonMobil and Ultra Petroleum are industry laggards in disclosure and are the only companies to receive resolutions focused on their fracking operations for three consecutive years.

The proposal was filed by As You Sow on behalf of the Park Foundation, and was co-filed by the following investor groups: Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate; Unitarian Universalist Service Committee; Benedictine Sisters of Boerne, Texas; Zevin Asset Management; First Affirmative Financial Network; and the Benedictine Sisters of Mount St. Scholastica. This proposal is part of an investor coalition effort coordinated by Green Century Capital Management and the Investor Environmental Health Network.

Monday, April 2, 2012

UPDATE: Do your part ... recycle a toilet

Posted by Pam Zubeck on Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:29 PM

Apparently, the county's waste collection facility won't be open the exact hours previously stated. Here's the schedule, as provided by the county's environmental manager, Kathy Andrew:

April 14 — Household Hazardous Waste Collection — Many products used in the home, garden, garage, and hobby shop contain hazardous chemicals that can potentially harm families. Anything marked "caution," "keep out of reach of children," "danger," "poison," "hazardous," "flammable," and “skin irritant" should be considered hazardous. The event is 9am until 1pm at 3255 Akers Drive, 80922. Call 520-7878

April 21 — Earth Day Celebration — Pikes Peak Recycles. In celebration of Earth Day and to encourage healthy homes and communities, El Paso County and the Pikes Peak Earth Day Committee will host a community recycling and proper disposal event. This event promotes proper waste disposal which is crucial to healthy counties and healthy families. 9am until 2pm, 3255 Akers Drive, 80922. Call 520-7878.

April 28 — National Prescription Drug Take-Back Day — Prescription drug abuse is alarmingly high more than cocaine, hallucinogens, and heroin combined. The majority of abused prescription medications are obtained from family and friends. To combat this problem, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration is providing the opportunity to rid homes of potentially dangerous expired, unused, and unwanted prescription medications. The event is 10am until 2pm, 3255 Akers Drive, 80922. Call 520-7878.


————— ORIGINAL POST, MARCH 30, 3:43 P.M. —————


Screen_shot_2012-03-30_at_3.32.51_PM.png

If you're changing out your bathroom fixtures, don't toss the toilet and sink into a landfill.

Starting Monday, El Paso County will start accepting porcelain as a recyclable at its Household Hazardous Waste Disposal facility, 3255 Akers Dr., to be crushed and used in road maintenance.

El Paso County commissioners this week adopted a resolution declaring April as Earth Month and April 11 as Earth Day.

“We all can help raise awareness and encourage our community…to voice their appreciation for the planet, to promote its protection, and to conserve our resources to make El Paso County a better place to live,” Commissioner Dennis Hisey said, as he read the resolution into the record, as reported in a news release.

The porcelain will be accepted free of charge, environmental manager Kathy Andrews said in the release, as are other items.

The disposal facility accepts a range of waste, including motor oil, electronics, fertilizer and paint at no cost. In addition to its regular schedule, the facility will be open from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. three Saturdays in April — the 14th, 21st, and 28th.

“Not everybody is or has been wasteful," Hisey says in the release. "Previous generations were aware of their limited resources. They had less and made due with less. I think we can learn a lot by looking backwards.”

Allison Plute and Megan Andreozzi of Pikes Peak Earth Day told commissioners of many activities the organization has planned in April, including a presentation by Denis Hayes, the organizer of the first Earth Day in 1970. A list of Pikes Peak Earth Day activities is available at: www.pikespeakearthday.org.

Tags: , , ,

Saturday, March 24, 2012

Smoke signals: controlled burns outside Woodland Park

Posted by Pam Zubeck on Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:00 AM

About 1,500 acres in the Trout West Ecosystem Management Project northwest of Woodland Park will be "treated" with prescribed burns that will begin soon.

The announcement comes from the Pike National Forest's Pikes Peak Ranger District in a news release.

The prescribed burns may cover up to 400 acres at one time. The burns will start when "favorable weather and fuel conditions permit" and continue into the fall but no specific days were given.

Ignition can take place only when weather and fuel conditions are optimal. Once the project begins, burning may last from one to several days, with smoke visible from Highway 67 during burning days and several days following ignition. These burns may continue into fall 2012.

Vegetation types are mostly ponderosa pine, grass and shrubs. Most of the timber has been thinned by commercial projects and hazard fuels reduction crews and the slash piles from these treatments have been burned. Surface burning of the area is the final step in the process and is designed to reduce the amount of timber, needles and small diameter woody debris. Fire managers expect the burns to improved soil nutrients and help grass and shrubs to re-sprout for wildlife habitat.
The Trout Creek Prescribed Burn is part of the Trout West Ecosystem Management Project on the Pike & San Isabel National Forests. It is a multi-year undertaking to restore more open conifer stands to the area, increase the amount of grass, shrubs and aspen and reduce dead fuel loading on the forest floor.
For more information contact the Pikes Peak District office at 719-636-1602

Tags: , ,

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Governor accused of citing misinformation

Posted by Pam Zubeck on Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:21 PM

The debate over oil and gas drilling in Colorado, and the environmental consequences, is heating up.

HIckenlooper: on the hot seat.
  • HIckenlooper: on the hot seat.

When residents started getting riled about groundwater and air pollution that could be caused by drilling, local officials started saying they wanted to be in charge, not entrust enforcement to the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. El Paso County commissioners were among those wanting more latitude at the local level.

Then, Gov. John Hickenlooper appointed a special task force to study the issue, even as he posed for newspaper ads and spoke on radio ads to reassure Coloradans the state is doing its job to protect the environment from hasty hydraulic fracturing fluids seeping into the ground or into waterways — a tactic activists found over-the-top.

Now, environmental activists are again crying foul over comments Hickenlooper made to the media about spills and releases of drilling fluids, saying, "There have been a few spills.”

Quite a few, 18 environmental groups say, noting that COGCC records show there have been a statewide total of 3,966 spills and releases since 2000.

“Governor Hickenlooper needs to stop misinforming the public about the amount of drilling and fracking fluids spilled and released on Colorado’s land and water,” Gary Wockner of Clean Water Action said in a press relesase. “There are not ‘a few spills;’ there are hundreds of spills and releases every year.”

In fact, statement says, the number of spills and releases have been growing over time. In 2002, there were 193; in 2010 and 2011, nearly 500 per year.

We've asked the governor's office for a comment and will update when we hear back.

From the release:

“The public needs to know the facts about the threat that drilling and fracking poses to our communities,” said Shane Davis of the Sierra Club. “Not only are chemicals spilled and released, the majority of that chemical pollution is never recovered or cleaned up.”

An earlier detailed analysis by the Sierra Club and Clean Water Action revealed that over 40% of spills/releases reported in Weld County between 2003 and 2012 contaminated groundwater, nearly 3% contaminated surface water, and a random sample of 6% of 1,000 reports suggested that up to 1.75 million gallons of spilled/released fluids was never “recovered.” Spilled/released fluids includes “oil,” “produced water,” and “other” as reported to the COGCC.

Spill_stats.jpg

Here's a list of the groups signing on to this press release. None is from Colorado Springs or El Paso County. In fact, we know of no groups that have formed around this issue in the Pikes Peak region, so if we've missed one, please, someone, let us know:

Clean Water Action, Fort Collins
Sierra Club — Poudre Canyon Group, Fort Collins
Western Colorado Congress of Mesa County
Sierra Club-Trappers Lake Group, Steamboat Springs
Coalition for a Clean Colorado, Affiliate groups:
Renewable Communities Alliance, Alamosa
Commerce City Unity NOW, Commerce City
Citizens for Huerfano County, La Veta
South Park Coalition, Como
Be The Change, Denver
Rifle-Silt-Peach Valley-New Castle (RSPN) Coalition, Silt
Frack-files, Greeley
What the Frack?! Arapahoe, Aurora
Coloradoans for Fair Rates and Clean Energy (CO-force), Boulder
Elbert County Oil and Gas Interest Group (ECOGIG), Agate
LongmontROAR, Longmont
Erie Rising, Erie
Citizens for a Healthy Community, Paonia
Routt County Frack, Steamboat Springs

Tags: , ,

Monday, March 12, 2012

Enviros unite on oil and gas drilling

Posted by Pam Zubeck on Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:05 AM

With the rise in oil and gas drilling in Colorado, those interested in protecting the environment have formed a new group called Coalition for a Clean Colorado or C3.

Oil_logo.png

From the announcement, which you can read in full here:

“We’re a diverse alliance, but what unites us all is a belief that clean air and water, government that is responsive to the concerns of people and communities, and a swift transition to local, clean energy resources and away from dirty, life-threatening fossil fuels, is essential for healthy communities and a livable future”, said Ceal Smith, founder of the Renewable Communities Alliance.

"Community interests often get lumped with conservation and the environment. But these interests don’t fully represent citizen concerns that encompass public health, government accountability, and energy democracy issues. The need for a Coalition that represents the grassroots was urgent", added Smith.

Some local residents who are closely watching how oil and gas drilling unfolds in El Paso County haven't joined C3 yet and have a few questions.

"I need to find out more about who is financing it, the goals and objectives, and its strategies before I decide to join," says Mary Talbott in an e-mail to us.

One part of C3's agenda is to encourage the migration from fossil fuels to clean energy, as stated in the group's announcement:

Replacing costly centralized dirty energy with efficient, affordable and democratic local clean energy is a Coalition priority. Says coalition member Shane Davis, “Natural gas is a bridge-fuel to nowhere. It only leads to increased dependency on just another dirty fossil fuel. What we need is healthy energy; Energy that is perpetually sustainable. If we want increased national security, dissolved dependency on foreign oil and gas, and a clean environment, then we need to start using our intellect and lead the world into sustainable energy independence.”

The announcement goes on to note that oil and gas drilling issues are surfacing across the state, from Weld County to Erie to Longmont to Boulder to Huerfano County, to name a few places.

El Paso County residents might be interested in C3, because Ultra Resources of Houston plans to drill on the eastern plains as well as on 18,000 acres within the city limits it acquired last year from a developer's bankruptcy. The city has declared a moratorium on drilling until the end of May.

Tags: , ,

Friday, March 9, 2012

Ohio links drilling to earthquakes

Posted by Pam Zubeck on Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:02 PM

Lets hope the seismic activity doesnt get this bad from oil drilling.
  • Let's hope the seismic activity doesn't get this bad from oil drilling.

Reacting to a study showing earthquakes resulted from an oil and gas injection well, the state of Ohio has adopted strict rules forbidding the injection of oil and gas drilling byproducts deep under ground.

This should be of interest to everyone in Colorado, where the development of more effective drilling techniques has created renewed interest in underground fossil fuel deposits, including the Niobrara formation that underlies part of El Paso County. The county might see rampant drilling by Ultra Resources of Houston, which has obtained mineral leases on thousands of acres and acquired 18,000 acres on the east side of Colorado Springs.

As we reported in January, seismic activity has been linked anecdotally with the use of injection wells to get rid of fracking materials used in oil and gas drilling, but the Ohio study is a watershed finding that could reverberate across the country.

Ohio's Department of Natural Resources reports that the EPA says there are more than 144,000 Class II disposal wells injecting more than two billion gallons of brine every day in the United States. "The U.S. EPA considers the deep injection of brine using Class II disposal wells as the preferred and environmentally safe method for disposal of oilfield fluid wastes," the Ohio agency says on its website.

But when earthquakes started happening in the Youngstown area in 2010, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources delved further, as reported by the agency's website:

ColoradoOilWell.jpg

In November 2011, newly appointed ODNR Director James Zehringer sought to obtain the additional data. After his first briefing on the seismic activity, Director Zehringer ordered the Ohio Geological Survey to seek an outside research partner and deploy the needed portable seismometers around the Youngstown area. The Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University had the available equipment and was willing to assist the state. The seismometers were deployed on Dec. 1, 2011.
On Dec. 24, the newly deployed equipment recorded a 2.7-magnitude earthquake in the area. Data from the portable seismometers was downloaded and analyzed by experts at Lamont-Doherty. On Dec. 29, Lamont-Doherty presented ODNR with their preliminary findings, which indicated the seismic event depth was 2,454 ft. below the injection well.
Based on the Lamont-Doherty data, Director Zehringer instructed ODNR regulators to seek the immediate halt of injections at Northstar 1, either voluntarily by the operator or by agency order. At 5 p.m. on Dec. 30, ODNR inspectors witnessed the shut down of the well. (Lamont-Doherty Analysis)

The findings led the state to issue this notice today:

COLUMBUS, OH — Ohio’s oil and gas regulators today announced new environmentally responsible standards for transporting and disposing of brine, a by-product of oil and natural gas hydraulic fracturing. The new regulatory framework makes Ohio’s rules for brine monitoring and disposal among the nation’s toughest. The Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) developed the new regulations after researching the link between a series of seismic events in the Youngstown area and a brine disposal well.

The new safeguards: prohibit any new wells to be drilled into the Precambrian basement rock formation; mandate operators submit extensive geological data before drilling; and implement state-of-the-art pressure and volume monitoring devices including automatic shut-off switches and electronic data recorders. In addition, ODNR will require that brine haulers install electronic transponders to ensure “cradle to grave” monitoring of all shipments.

“Ohio has developed a new set of regulatory standards that positions the state as a national leader in safe and environmentally responsible brine disposal,” said ODNR Director James Zehringer. “Ohioans demand smart environmental safeguards that protect our environment and promote public health. These new standards accomplish this goal.”

The new safeguards will be added to Ohio’s existing disposal well regulatory framework. The regulations will apply to new Class II disposal well permit applications and to existing disposal wells, if applicable. Ohio regulates Class II disposal wells on behalf of the U.S. EPA. In 1983, the U.S. EPA gave Ohio regulatory authority over its Underground Injection Control program because the state’s disposal well regulations met or exceeded U.S. EPA standards.

The comprehensive list of proposed new regulations includes:
· Requires a review of existing geologic data for known faulted areas within the state and a prohibition on locating new Class II disposal wells within these areas;
· Requires a complete suite of geophysical logs (including, at a minimum, gamma ray, compensated density-neutron, and resistivity logs) to be run on newly drilled Class II disposal wells. A copy of the completed log, with analytical interpretation, will be submitted to ODNR;
· Authority for ODNR to require the plugging with cement of wells penetrating into the Precambrian basement rock and prohibiting injection into the Precambrian basement rock;
· Requires the submission, at time of permit application, of any information available concerning the existence of known geological faults within a specified distance of the proposed well location, and submission of a plan for monitoring any seismic activity that may occur;
· Evaluates the potential for conducting seismic surveys;
· Requires a measurement or calculation of original down hole reservoir pressure prior to initial injection;
· Requires conducting a step-rate injection test to establish formation parting pressure and injection rates;
· Requires the installation of a continuous pressure monitoring system, with results being electronically available to ODNR for review;
· Requires the installation of an automatic shut-off system set to operate if the fluid injection pressure exceeds a maximum level to be set by ODNR; and
· Requires the installation of an electronic data recording system for purposes of tracking all fluids brought by a brine transporter for injection.

All of the reforms will be considered during the permitting process for new Class II disposal wells and will be implemented as attached permit conditions until they are either codified in law or written into administrative rule, which carries the weight of law.

Colorado has more than 800 injection wells, as we reported last month in a story about disposal of hydraulic fracturing waste from oil and gas drilling.

As the then head of the Colorado Oil and Gas Commission, Dave Neslin, told us, the state is monitoring injection wells in light of the seismic activity registered elsewhere and in Colorado in the past. From our story:

The most common way to dispose of waste material is by injecting it 12,000 feet into the ground, Neslin says.

He acknowledges that earthquakes began in 1963 in the Denver area after an injection well was drilled at the nearby Rocky Mountain Arsenal. When injection stopped in 1968, so did the seismic activity, a memo posted on the COGCC's website says.

"This is an issue we're looking at now and coordinating with the Colorado Geological Survey as part of our permitting for underground injection wells," Neslin says. "We want to be sure the new wells being drilled are being sited in areas that will reduce or avoid the risk of any seismic connection."

Tags: , , , ,

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

UPDATE: Notes from the Over the River county meetings

Posted by Edie Adelstein on Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:40 PM

Fremont County's decision as to if it would grant Over the River a temporary event permit has been pushed back a month.

Though still on the agenda for today's meeting, Over the River spokesperson Miles Graham says the county is expected to delay consideration on the permit until its March 13 or 27 meetings, due to Over the River's new projected dates of display, which were recently rescheduled for August 2015.

——- ORIGINAL POST, 5:55 P.M., FRIDAY ——-

Both sides stated their case and felt heard. Now it's out of their hands.

Screen_shot_2012-02-03_at_5.09.04_PM.png
  • Wolfgang Volz, Christo

Wednesday and Thursday's public hearings in Cañon City and Cotopaxi were productive and filled to the hilt, according to Over the River spokesperson Miles Graham and Rags Over the Arkansas River (ROAR) vice president Ellen T. Bauder. Even though Christo and the late Jeanne-Claude's Over the River installation has received a green light from the Bureau of Land Management, it must still obtain temporary event permits from Fremont and Chaffee counties.

Graham estimates there were more than 100 people at each meeting. As far as those who spoke, Graham says in Cañon City it was 2-to-1 for the project. (Organizations who spoke in favor of the project include Action 22, as well as Blake Milteer from the Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center.) In Cotopaxi, it was about 50-50, but as they expected, he says.

For her part, Bauder says it would be impossible to tell how many at the meetings were for or against — beyond those wearing T-shirts OTR handed out.

Bauder was struck by the 15-some officers from the Fremont County Sheriff's Office in attendance at the Cañon City hearings. "I was kind of taken aback. It was like walking into a, I don't know, the hearing of a major criminal or something. It was just a spooky feeling."

She doesn't know why so many were there (only a handful were at the Cotopaxi hearing), but it highlighted the concern of one county resident who pointed out that with so much law enforcement in one place, the rest of the county was probably left unprotected. Same thing could crop up should the project happen.

Fremont County commissioners will continue to collect written public comment through 4:30 p.m., Thursday, Feb. 9, and then table the issue, possibly working on conditions, until their end-of-the-month public meeting, Graham says.

What they will say, neither Graham nor Bauder will speculate, but it could be a flat-out "no" or a "yes, with conditions." If rejected, Graham won't say how it will affect the project, but it would mark a significant victory for Bauder and ROAR.

Should Fremont accept, OTR will then move onto Chaffee County for the same permit approval process. Chaffee will vote on its updated temporary event permit process next week, Graham says, at which point OTR will begin to apply for that county's permit.

For more information on OTR and Fremont County, visit fremontcountyotr.com. Comments may be submitted to (planning@fremontco.com and cc: bocc@fremontco.com)

Tags: , , , , , ,

Most Commented On

Top Topics in IndyBlog

Local News (33)


Medical Marijuana (14)


City Gov (13)


Arts (13)


Food & Drink (12)


Most Shared Stories

Top Viewed Stories

All content © Copyright 2012, The Colorado Springs Independent   |   Website powered by Foundation