Media

Thursday, January 26, 2017

Furda takes post at National Cybersecurity Center

Posted By on Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:23 AM

The Colorado Springs Business Journal's publisher Jenifer Furda has accepted a position as chief operating officer at the National Cybersecurity Center, starting Feb. 24, the Business Journal reported.

screen_shot_2017-01-26_at_10.17.04_am.png
Furda became publisher in 2015 when owner John Weiss announced his semi-retirement. She had previously served as associate publisher after Weiss bought the journal from The Dolan Co.

Furda posted this message on Facebook on Wednesday:
This was a hard decision to make because I LOVE the CSBJ and I LOVE my work sister [Colorado Springs Independent publisher] Carrie Simison! But Jon Furda and I thought the risk of leaving something you love was worth the opportunity to serve the Colorado Springs community, our state and dare I say the nation in such an impactful way with the National Cybersecurity Center was worth the risk. The good news is that the CSBJ paper is as solid as I have ever seen it from top to bottom. Under the leadership of Amy Gillentine Sweet the team here will continue as a business resource with excellent LOCAL business coverage in a fair and balanced manner and great exposure for your business. So I ask of ALL my COS friends continue to support the BEST DAMN business paper in this region and KEEP reading the CSBJ and leading the conversation...I know I will!
The journal and Colorado Springs Independent are owned by the Colorado Publishing House.
  • Favorite

Tags: , , , , ,

Thursday, January 19, 2017

Media to Trump: Game on

Posted By on Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 4:23 PM

This is a graphic reminder of the size of the media industry that has been and will continue to cover Donald Trump. This is just one section of a warehouse north of Denver where The Denver Post and many other newspapers are published, including the Independent. Rolls of paper are brought in by rail car. That's Indy founder and chairman John Weiss in the middle. - PAM ZUBECK
  • Pam Zubeck
  • This is a graphic reminder of the size of the media industry that has been and will continue to cover Donald Trump. This is just one section of a warehouse north of Denver where The Denver Post and many other newspapers are published, including the Independent. Rolls of paper are brought in by rail car. That's Indy founder and chairman John Weiss in the middle.

Journalists aren't too keen on being pushed around, so two groups of news media have authored letters to Donald Trump, who becomes the nation's 45th president on Friday.

The first is from Columbia Journalism Review, which states, in part:
In these final days before your inauguration, we thought it might be helpful to clarify how we see the relationship between your administration and the American press corps.

It will come as no surprise to you that we see the relationship as strained. Reports over the last few days that your press secretary is considering pulling news media offices out of the White House are the latest in a pattern of behavior that has persisted throughout the campaign: You’ve banned news organizations from covering you. You’ve taken to Twitter to taunt and threaten individual reporters and encouraged your supporters to do the same. You’ve advocated for looser libel laws and threatened numerous lawsuits of your own, none of which has materialized. You’ve avoided the press when you could and flouted the norms of pool reporting and regular press conferences. You’ve ridiculed a reporter who wrote something you didn’t like because he has a disability.

All of this, of course, is your choice and, in a way, your right. While the Constitution protects the freedom of the press, it doesn’t dictate how the president must honor that; regular press conferences aren’t enshrined in the document.

But while you have every right to decide your ground rules for engaging with the press, we have some, too. It is, after all, our airtime and column inches that you are seeking to influence. We, not you, decide how best to serve our readers, listeners, and viewers. So think of what follows as a backgrounder on what to expect from us over the next four years. 
To finish reading the letter, reference the link above. It's really worth the time.

In addition, the Society of Professional Journalists issued a letter to Trump, which includes this:
Our Founding Fathers knew the importance of a press that is free to
report on the activities of our government and elected officials. “Our
liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited
without being lost,” said Thomas Jefferson in a January 28, 1786, letter.
Yet here we are, almost exactly 231 years after Jefferson wrote those
words, and attempts to stifle the flow of information to citizens of the
United States continue. 
SPJ asks for a meeting with Trump, saying, "We would like to have a conversation regarding how we can work together to ensure that self-government as outlined by the Constitution survives and flourishes, and that a free press remains a cornerstone of our nation and our liberty."

I don't know whether SPJ has been asleep for the last year or what, but can anyone imagine Trump saying, "Okey dokey, let's sit down and discuss this like adults"? Not gonna happen.

In fact, while I appreciate SPJ's earnestness, some lines in the letter are laughable, considering who they're writing to. Like this one, "We urge you to publicly affirm your commitment to transparency..."

Wait. This is the guy who still hasn't released his tax returns and won't. So, all we can say is good luck with that.

  • Favorite

Tags: , , ,

Monday, January 9, 2017

'Alt-right' agitator Milo Yiannopoulos named LGBTQ Nation's 'Person of the Year'

Posted By on Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:33 PM

WIKIPEDIA COMMONS
  • Wikipedia Commons
LGBTQ Nation, an online news magazine that claims to be a leading news source for LGBTQ people (and runs other LGBTQ-focused websites such as Queerty and GayCities), has named Milo Yiannopoulos its “Person of the Year.”

Yes, we’re talking about the same Milo Yiannopoulos with ties to the white-nationalist, xenophobic, racist, transphobic, homophobic, anti-Semitic, misogynistic “alt-right” movement whose upcoming visit to UCCS has half our city in an uproar.

What’s more, in the article announcing his win, the site bowed to pressure from Yiannopoulos himself to remove reference to the “alt-right” movement from their write-up. While Yiannopoulos does not personally identify with that label, and many “alt-right” leaders disavow him, he still shares fundamental ideological beliefs with the movement.

Their excuse for Yiannopoulos’ win? It’s the result of internet poll, which accepted votes from everyone — LGBTQ Nation readers and otherwise. The “otherwise” — Yiannopoulos’ fans who mobilized via sites like Reddit and 4chan — won out. These fans spammed the poll, and ended up tipping the scales in his favor, earning him nearly 70 percent of the vote.

A similar effort on behalf of Vice President-Elect Mike Pence (who is vehemently anti-LGBTQ and advocates for LGBTQ conversion therapy) landed the governor in second place.

Now, one might think that, even if Yiannopoulos did win “fair and square” as LGBTQ Nation says, there might be some amount of editorial control over these things. The site could make a statement by refusing to allow Yiannopoulos the same courtesy previous persons of the year have received — namely an interview.

But instead of making that statement, it seems LGBTQ Nation will give Yiannopoulos an opportunity to speak his mind, allowing him one more platform for his vehement hate speech.

The site has asserted that in naming Yiannopoulos “person of the year,” they do not necessarily mean that he’s had a positive impact on the LGBTQ community. What it means, simply, is that he has had an impact.

“Hate him or love him, one thing Yiannopoulos truly excels at is getting attention for himself and his causes ... For a gay guy from Britain, he has truly made his mark on conservative American politics and entertainment. He’s been able to brand himself the ultimate gay provocateur in a year of provocateurs,” the website says.

Considering Yiannopoulos consistently encourages violence against minority groups, it may not be the best idea to allow him more platforms to “provoke,” but LGBTQ Nation has made up its mind.

If you are interested in making a statement to UCCS about his speech, currently tentatively scheduled for Jan. 26, the community group Colorado Springs Anti-fascists have organized a Facebook event with information about who to contact with your concerns. There may also be a public protest scheduled for the same day.

  • Favorite

Tags: , , ,

Friday, January 6, 2017

UPDATE: Excitment over Coachella reminds the world of Anschutz’s ties to anti-LGBTQ organizations

Posted By on Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:52 PM

After a Washington Post article exposed donations from Phil Anschutz to anti-LGBTQ hate groups six months ago, news outlets, individuals and organizations called on Anschutz to cease any and all donations to anti-LGBTQ hate groups.

As we reported earlier, he has apparently done so, and expressed support for the rights of "all people" in the process. That prompted this response from One Colorado, a prominent statewide LGBTQ organization, and ProgressNow Colorado:


DENVER — Six months after calling on Colorado billionaire Phil Anschutz to stop funding groups who oppose basic rights and equality for all Americans, including LGBTQ Americans, ProgressNow Colorado, the state’s largest online progressive advocacy organization, and One Colorado, the state's leading advocacy organization for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Coloradans, expressed relief that Anschutz has stopped donating to these organizations.

“Last summer, an article in the Washington Post exposed nearly $200,000 in contributions from the Anschutz Foundation to anti-LGBT hate groups, including the Alliance Defending Freedom and the so-called Family Research Council,” said ProgressNow Colorado executive director Ian Silverii. “We called on Phil Anschutz to immediately stop funding these groups, for whom anti-LGBT discrimination is plainly central to their mission — and it's our understanding that he has done so.”

"It is heartening to see Phil Anschutz give his unequivocal support of everyone, regardless of sexual orientation, and we appreciate that the Anschutz Foundation has stopped funding anti-LGBTQ hate groups after the Washington Post revealed the funding in their July article," said One Colorado Executive Director, Daniel Ramos. "We are grateful that Phil Anschutz looked at the facts and did the right thing after our organization and others asked him to cease funding these groups."

“We are relieved that Anschutz has ceased funding to grantees when made aware of their anti-LGBT activities, and we'll continue to be vigilant to ensure he keeps this promise,” said Silverii. "We're proud that our organization played a role in helping convince Phil Anschutz to stop funding hate."


——- ORIGINAL POST, THURSDAY, 4:36 P.M. ——-
Love is love, right? - GPOINTSTUDIO / SHUTTERSTOCK
  • gpointstudio / ShutterStock
  • Love is love, right?


Ah, Coachella. Whatever your personal feelings about writhing around outdoors with thousands of drunk people while watching “the greats” on a stage too far away to see, there’s no denying it’s one of the most anticipated music festivals of the year.

The hype for this summer’s event only got louder when the lineup was released — including queen Beyoncé headlining — with notable appearances by Radiohead and Kendrick Lamar.

But amid all the excitement, some financial details about the festival’s owner, real estate mogul Philip Anschutz, began to resurface. We reported in depth on Anschutz last summer, and took a look at the organizations to which he gives his money. Among these, anti-LGBTQ organizations the Alliance Defending Freedom, the National Christian Foundation and the Family Research Council stood out, as originally uncovered by the Washington Post.

People were appropriately outraged at the time, but the fervor has since died down. Now, thanks to reminders by Esquire, Teen Vogue, Huffington Post (who even mentioned our blog in their story) and plenty more, fans are starting to question the man in charge of Coachella.

Meanwhile, Anschutz apparently told the Rolling Stone that the uproar was "fake news," and that he had ended all contributions to the groups in question.

"Recent claims published in the media that I am anti-LGBTQ are nothing more than fake news – it is all garbage," he told the Rolling Stone. "I unequivocally support the rights of all people without regard to sexual orientation."

Whatever his assertions, it's safe to say that proud feminist Beyoncé isn't down with prejudice toward the LGBTQ community, and we imagine many of the performers on the lineup aren't either. So we’re left to wonder what the public backlash is going to accomplish.

Will Queen Bey back out? Will there be a massive boycott? Or will Anschutz' response calm the public? Considering three-day passes start at $399, the controversy could lead some to choose a different use for their money.

Whatever ends up happening, this immediate outcry is encouraging. It wasn’t always that someone’s ties to anti-LGBTQ organizations caused public disavowal. Nowadays it's almost a career-ender.

After gospel singer Kim Burrell’s anti-LGBTQ rant went viral, she got kicked off Ellen and faced tons of backlash from others involved in the film Hidden Figures, the soundtrack of which she contributed to.

Plus, looking back on this summer, plenty of high-profile musicians refused to tour in North Carolina in light of its controversial bathroom legislation, which restricts the rights of transgender individuals to use public restrooms. The state faced some economic downturn as a result.

Then, of course, many of us still remember the Chick-fil-A fiasco, or the boycott on Barilla pasta, both due to anti-LGBTQ sentiments expressed by the companies’ owners.

We may not know what the future holds for Coachella yet, but it’s nice that people are starting to speak up.

  • Favorite

Tags: , , , , ,

Tuesday, November 1, 2016

Dear Gazette, I don't think that word means what you think it means

Posted By on Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 12:40 PM

They say those who live in glass houses shouldn't cast stones. And hey, we all make mistakes. But the doozy on the front page of the Gazette Tuesday morning is a little too comical not to comment on.

Apparently, neither writer Chhun Sun, nor his editor, knows what the word "unnerved" means. I say this because in the first sentence of the Gazette's top story today, Sun says Mayor John Suthers was "unnerved" by road construction going on near him. (The piece was about the progress made on road projects with funding from voter approved Ballot Issue 2C.) In the very next sentence, Sun says Suthers was wearing "an ear-to-ear grin."

Just a clarification here, readers: Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines "unnerve" as:

Full Definition of unnerve
transitive verb
1
: to deprive of courage, strength, or steadiness
2
: to cause to become nervous : upset

So if Suthers was unnerved and also wearing an ear-to-ear grin, then, well, he was being really creepy. It appears, however that the Suthers was actually acting normally, since the Gazette has since updated the story online, replacing the word "unnerved" with "unfazed."

Here is the original:

screen_shot_2016-11-01_at_11.50.18_am.png

And the new version:

screen_shot_2016-11-01_at_11.49.52_am.png
















  • Favorite

Tags: , , ,

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Trinidad settles lawsuit stemming from bad arrests

Posted By on Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:18 PM

HOUSTONDWIPHOTOS
  • houstonDwiPhotos
The ACLU of Colorado just announced that the city of Trinidad agreed to pay $375,000 to settle a lawsuit involving two women who were arrested based on bogus information.

The case was thoroughly reported by Alan Prendergast in Westword back in 2014. Prendergast, with Westword since 1995, is a gifted writer and diligent reporter, who periodically teaches journalism at Colorado College in Colorado Springs. From Westword's website:
Prendergast reported on this issue two years ago. - COURTESY ALAN PRENDERGAST
  • Courtesy Alan Prendergast
  • Prendergast reported on this issue two years ago.
His stories about the justice system, historic crimes, high-security prisons and death by misadventure have won numerous awards and appeared in a wide range of magazines and anthologies, including the 2012 true-crime anthology Seven Sins, The Best American Crime Reporting 2008 and The Best American Sports Writing 2009. He has also written for Rolling Stone, Outside, Los Angeles Times Magazine, Men’s Journal and other national publications and is the author of a book about child abuse and parricide, The Poison Tree.
The ACLU's news release:
DENVER – The City of Trinidad has agreed to pay $375,000 to settle a lawsuit brought by the ACLU of Colorado on behalf of Danika Gonzales and Felicia Valdez, two innocent women who were wrongly arrested and prosecuted for crimes they did not commit in a reckless 2013 “drug sting” where police relied on the false accusations of an untrustworthy confidential informant.

The ACLU filed suit in January 2015 alleging that Trinidad detectives incentivized a confidential informant, Crystal Bachicha, to make false, self-serving accusations. To obtain arrest warrants, the detectives deliberately concealed facts that they knew would destroy the informant’s credibility, including Bachicha’s convictions for fraud and drug crimes, her known biases against the people she claimed to have sold drugs to, and numerous documented instances in which Bachicha lied to law enforcement officers.

“Trinidad detectives allowed a devious snitch to frame our innocent clients for crimes they did not commit,” said ACLU of Colorado Legal Director Mark Silverstein. “With this settlement, our clients have been vindicated, and Trinidad detectives have received a clear message that the uncorroborated say-so of a shady snitch cannot justify destroying the careers and reputations of innocent members of the community.”

Overall, 40 individuals were arrested during Trinidad’s widely-publicized 2013 “drug sting,” on the basis of false, deficient, and misleading arrest affidavits. None of the 40 arrests resulted in a drug-related conviction.

“At the time Trinidad police tapped Bachicha to be an informant, they knew that she was a convicted felon, a liar, a drug user, and had a history of providing false information to law enforcement,” said ACLU staff attorney Rebecca Wallace. “Yet, over and over again, the police took Bachicha at her word as she falsely accused many of her enemies of selling drugs.”

Gonzales, who had been Bachicha’s probation officer, lost her job as a result of the false arrest. Valdez was fired from her job with the Trinidad School System, and she and her children were evicted from their federally-subsidized housing.

“This incident was traumatic for me emotionally and financially, and I lost my sense of normalcy and confidence. The reckless actions of the Trinidad Police Department have caused irreversible damage to my career, my family, and my trust in law enforcement,” said Gonzales. “However, I am relieved to have finally gotten to this point of closure. I am so very thankful for the continued hope and support given to me by my family, friends, and all of the outstanding attorneys with the ACLU of Colorado and Baker/Hostetler.”

The City of Trinidad has not conducted its annual drug sting since the 2013 debacle, and the two lead detectives have since retired, according to a recent report in Pueblo Chieftain.

“Our investigation into this case revealed a police department whose repeated use of unreliable confidential informants had caused it to lose the trust of the community it served,” said ACLU cooperating attorney Paul Karlsgodt of BakerHostetler. “Trinidad police acted under constitutionally-deficient procedures which gave untrustworthy informants an open invitation to lie, divert buy money, skim drugs for their own use, and use their positions as informants to settle personal scores against their enemies.”

“The settlement helps to repair some, but not all, of the lasting damage caused by these practices, and we hope it has also given the department an opportunity to self-reflect and make necessary changes to ensure this never happens again,” said cooperating attorney Casie Collignon of BakerHostetler.

Gonzales and Valdez were represented by Silverstein, Wallace, and ACLU staff attorney Sara Neel, as well as a BakerHostetler team led by Karlsgodt, Collignon, and former associate Nathan Schacht.

  • Favorite

Tags: , , , ,

Friday, October 7, 2016

Debate simulcast coming to a theater near you

Posted By on Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 11:24 AM

JSTONE / SHUTTERSTOCK
  • JStone / Shutterstock

Seriously, why attend a drab party-headquarters viewing, when you can catch Sunday’s presidential grudge-match live on the big screen at your local Regal Cinema?

Imagine hearing Donald Trump reprise his first debate’s locomotive-breath delivery in surround-sound audio!

Thrill to the prospect of Hillary Clinton showing off her latest Paddington Bear outfit on a three-story screen!

Trust us, this is going to be huge.

Colorado Springs politicos can catch the free simulcast Sunday at the Regal Interquest Stadium 14 & RPX, beginning at 7 p.m. MST.

  • Favorite

Tags: , , , , ,

Monday, October 3, 2016

Chieftain apologizes for "lapse in judgment"

Posted By on Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:26 PM

A headline in today's Pueblo Chieftain drew sharp criticism from a university professor, and it's not surprising why.

To herald the Denver Broncos' rout of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, here's the Chieftain's headline:
screen_shot_2016-10-03_at_12.09.13_pm.png

Tim McGettigan, a professor of sociology at Colorado State University in Pueblo, wrote to the Chieftain saying, "I doubt that the Denver Broncos would find any humor in your sick 'racist joke.' I demand an apology and a retraction. I also urge the Chieftain to educate its editorial staff on the finer points of racism in America."

We asked Managing Editor Steve Henson about it, and he writes via email:
“In our effort to be clever, we erred in using a phrase that is offensive. We apologize for the lapse in judgement.”

  • Favorite

Tags: , , ,

Friday, September 23, 2016

Chalfin takes over Morning Edition set

Posted By on Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:17 PM

When you tune in to Morning Edition on NPR at KRCC, you'll now hear local news director Andrea Chalfin, according to a news release from KRCC.

Andrea Chalfin, longtime news director at 91.5 KRCC, Colorado College’s NPR-member station, is taking over as host of the station’s daily broadcast of “Morning Edition.” The show is NPR’s flagship news magazine program.
Andrea Chalfin: Taking a new step. - COURTESY KRCC
  • Courtesy KRCC
  • Andrea Chalfin: Taking a new step.
Chalfin brings more than decade of experience as a reporter and broadcaster to the role. She has helmed 91.5 KRCC's news department since 2008, overseeing the station’s coverage of the Pikes Peak region and Southern Colorado. Her reporting has been recognized by the Associated Press, the Colorado Broadcasters Association, the Radio Television and Digital News Association, and Public Radio News Directors Inc., and has been heard on NPR, BBC, and other public radio stations across the country.

“I'm looking forward to this opportunity to not only shepherd a growing news operation, but also to help shape the sound of the most important program of the day,” says Chalfin. As the host of “Morning Edition,” Chalfin will contribute top-of-the-hour live newscasts and continue to direct the station's local news coverage.

“I'm very excited to have Andrea in this new role,” says Tammy Terwelp, the station’s manager. “She brings the journalistic skills needed for us to stay competitive and serve our audience with a deeper connection.”

Chalfin replaces Shawn Rosvold, who has hosted the show since February 2014. Rosvold is retiring after 50 years in the broadcast business, but will remain connected to 91.5 KRCC, occasionally filling in as a substitute host for “Morning Edition.”

Program Director Jeff Bieri expects Chalfin’s news experience will enable 91.5 KRCC to continue to develop the local profile of the morning drive-time program. “NPR’s ‘Morning Edition’ is the gold standard of national news magazines,” Bieri says, “and it will be enhanced even further by Andrea’s contribution of local news and her on air presence.”



  • Favorite

Tags: , , ,

Thursday, July 7, 2016

UPDATE: Anschutz in bed with anti-LGBT forces

Posted By on Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM

The Broadmoor in Colorado Springs is one of many holdings of Phllip Anschutz, who reportedly donates money to anti-LGBT rights groups. - CASEY BRADLEY GENT
  • Casey Bradley Gent
  • The Broadmoor in Colorado Springs is one of many holdings of Phllip Anschutz, who reportedly donates money to anti-LGBT rights groups.
UPDATE:
We received this a couple of hours ago from the Anschutz Foundation:

The Anschutz Foundation is not a member of Jonathan Capehart's alleged "vast right wing conspiracy." The Anschutz Foundation donates to hundreds of worthy organizations each year, and it does not attempt to dictate to those organizations how to spend their monies. Moreover, those donations are made in accordance with our process and guidelines, and neither process or guidelines identify or reference in any way sexual orientation or gender issues.

Mr. Anschutz, and the Anschutz companies, invest in many businesses employing tens of thousands of people. In all instances, personal lifestyles are neither a requirement or limitation to employment.

Mr. Capehart's attempt to smear individuals with unfounded allegations is straight out of the Saul Alinsky playbook. It is unworthy of him and of the publication by which he is employed.

This is no reason to comment further on his unfounded statements or on the individuals quoted in his article.


—-ORIGINAL POST 1:19 PM JULY 7, 2016—-

Two groups supportive of LGBT issues are calling out the owner of The Broadmoor and the Gazette as a funder of anti-LGBT efforts after The Washington Post reported who's behind legislation to overturn LGBT rights.

Philip Anschutz, the billionaire entertainment and energy mogul whom we profiled here in regard to the city's land swap with The Broadmoor, has given money to organizations that oppose LGBT rights. Here's what the Post reported about him:
Phil Anschutz is one of the richest people in America, with an estimated fortune of over $10 billion, and is listed at #42 on Forbes' U.S. Billionaires list as of May 17, 2016.

His entertainment company, AEG, is the world’s largest owner of sports teams and venues, including the Los Angeles Lakers, Los Angeles Kings, the Staples Center, and O2 Arena. In addition, Anschutz owns The Weekly Standard, the Washington Examiner, and Regal Cinemas. He’s also one of the largest landowners in the country.

Anschutz Foundation gave $110,000 to Alliance Defending Freedom between 2011 and 2013.

Anschutz Foundation gave $50,000 to National Christian Foundation between 2011 and 2013.

Anschutz Foundation gave $30,000 to Family Research Council between 2010 and 2013
James Dobson, founder of Springs-based Focus on the Family, known for its opposition to LGBT people and its focus on conversion therapy over the years, also is named on the list of donors to various anti-LGBT rights organizations. Tom Minnery, also with Focus, is listed, along with the king of LGBT hatred, Gordon Klingenschmitt, who holds a Colorado House seat but was defeated in the June 28 Republican primary race for a state Senate seat.

Here's the One Colorado news release:
DENVER – One Colorado, the state’s leading advocacy organization for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Coloradans and their families, and ProgressNow Colorado, the state’s largest online progressive advocacy organization, released the following statement in response to a report in the Washington Post showing that Colorado billionaire Phil Anschutz has funded anti-LGBTQ groups.

“Today the Washington Post revealed that while making a fortune off hardworking Coloradans – including LGBTQ Coloradans – billionaire Phil Anschutz has been giving money to organizations that have been designated as hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center,” said Dave Montez, Executive Director of One Colorado.

“Instead of investing in individuals and groups that spread misinformation and advocate violence, Phil Anschutz could invest in improving the lives of LGBTQ Coloradans and their families. LGBTQ students still face bullying and harassment in our schools, transgender Coloradans are denied access to the health care, identity documents, and basic rights they deserve, and it is still legal for to subject young people to the dangerous and discredited practice of conversion therapy.”

"Phil Anschutz's extensive influence in Colorado politics has been known for years, but the degree of his support for anti-LGBTQ groups that fund extremist hate groups like Gordon Kligenschmitt’s ‘Pray in Jesus Name’ is shocking," said ProgressNow Colorado executive director Ian Silverii. "At a time in American history when discrimination and violence against LGBTQ citizens is on the rise, support for pro-discrimination groups puts Anschutz on the wrong side of Colorado, and on the wrong side of history."

"The Anschutz name is emblazoned on public institutions across our state," said Silverii. "Now that it has been revealed that his charity is also going to organizations that support political figures who call for gays and lesbians to be killed, it's time to ask Anschutz to take a good look at where his money is being spent. The Alliance Defending Freedom props up the same politicians who have introduced hundreds of rights-destroying bills in legislatures across the country – including right here in Colorado. Today, we’re asking Mr. Anschutz to cancel his checks to the ADF, and instead invest in Colorado-based organizations that help improve the lives of LGBTQ friends and neighbors, not try and strip their rights away."
Anschutz has been known to use his publications to showcase his investments, which was reported by Corey Hutchins for the Columbia Journalism Review, titled, "The Oklahoman runs a puff piece on its billionaire owner’s new resort property." 

So one might ask, what agenda on Anschutz's behalf is being carried out by the Gazette? We've sent an email to Gazette publisher Dan Steever about this and will report back if and when we hear from him. The newspaper's newsroom is overseen by newly hired editor Vince Bzdek, a former editor at The Washington Post.

  • Favorite

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, May 23, 2016

Gazette fails to make disclosure in land-swap editorial

Posted By on Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:03 AM

Who's behind the editorial? Always good policy to unmask conflicting connections. - WILLIAM CLIFFORD
  • William Clifford
  • Who's behind the editorial? Always good policy to unmask conflicting connections.
In the news business, it's crucial that readers be informed of any conflicts of interest that exist between a news organization and the subject of the reporting.

The reason is obvious: Readers deserve to know whether there are forces at work that aren't readily apparent.

As the city's proposed land swap with The Broadmoor has unfolded, the Gazette, which is owned by an entity that's owned by Broadmoor owner Philip Anschutz, has inconsistently disclosed that connection. Some news stories have carried the disclosure; some haven't.

In an April editorial supporting the trade, the Gazette added this footnote at the bottom: "EDITOR'S NOTE: The Broadmoor is owned by The Gazette's parent company and operated under separate and independent management."

(Let's digress for one second to challenge that statement. Under separate and independent management? Christian Anschutz is a member of the newspaper's editorial board. He's Philip Anschutz's son. That doesn't sound very much like independent management.)

In any event, in another editorial that appeared in the Sunday, May 22 edition, openly supporting the land swap, the Gazette makes no disclosure of its connection to The Broadmoor.

And readers weren't fooled.

From comments on the newspaper's site:

"Who wrote this article, Anschutz himself? ... Ya'll are so pathetic you hide behind the name
"The Gazette editorial board". I can see why b/c nobody likes you and you would be black-listed in this town. Terrible cronysim-journalism."

"The Gazette should be embarrassed that it did not disclose that the Broadmoor and the Gazette are both owned by Philip Anschutz." "Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely."

Even a land swap supporter was nonplussed.
"I support this swap. With that being said the Gazette should absolutely express that their ownership is the same as the Broadmoor ownership so readers can understand there might be a conflict of interest with this editorial. That is simply good journalism and the omission suggests there is a hidden agenda as opposed to transparency and that absolutely hurts the credibility of the article as a whole."

(Editor's note: It's also worth mentioning here that the Denver Post published a lengthy piece in its Sunday issue on the land swap controversy, including numerous links to other stories and online sources on both sides. All of the links to media coverage aside from the Post were to stories in the Gazette, and none to the Independent or any other medium.)
  • Favorite

Tags: , , , ,

Monday, April 25, 2016

Why did the Gazette hold a landslide story?

Posted By on Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:40 PM

gazettetestarticle.png

When is a news article not a news article? When it's a test article, apparently.

There are things we don't know yet, but would note that over the weekend, The Denver Post published this fine piece of work by Ryan Maye Handy, formerly of the Gazette, who delved into the consequences of the city and developers not heeding warnings from geological experts.

The result was a story titled, "Warnings did not stop development in Colorado Springs' landslide zone."

Here's a portion of the story, which has generated more than 200 reader comments so far:
City officials have known about the problem since at least the mid-1990s, when they passed an ordinance designed to restrict development, but the measure has not been enforced and new homes have gone up almost unabated.

In other parts of the state where similar problems have occurred — including Boulder and Jefferson counties — landuse code prohibits building on known landslide areas.

Insurance will not cover the losses. At least 70 homeowners in southwest Colorado Springs are seeking federal grants to help buy out their destroyed or imperiled houses — the third round of such funding for the city. Nineteen of those properties are located in neighborhoods surrounding a Broadmoor Hotel golf course where a landslide has been an issue for years.

"In my mind, the process threw caution to the wind," said Jon White, a geologist with the Colorado Geological Survey. "Many knew the risks. Everybody should have been more cautious and the risks should have been disclosed to the potential homebuyers." 

In a letter to Colorado Springs officials last week, state geologists urged the city to take more aggressive action than they have to monitor and assess the risk the Broadmoor golf course slide poses to homes, infrastructure and residents of the area.
We've highlighted the references to The Broadmoor, because evidence suggests the Gazette had an opportunity to run some version of this story more than a month ago and apparently chose not to.

Be aware that the newspaper is owned by Clarity Media Group, which is controlled by Philip Anschutz, who also owns The Broadmoor.

As you can see above, the Gazette began to mount the story on its website on March 7. The "in progress" posting could be found as recently as just before noon Monday, when the article portion was removed — though the byline and March 7 date remain — about 50 minutes after we sent an email to Gazette Publisher Dan Steever and Editor Vince Bzdek. We provided them the screen shot and asked why the story was never published.

So far, no response from either of them, but now the page looks like this:

screen_shot_2016-04-25_at_12.23.06_pm.png

We discovered the "test article" last month and wrote a story about The Broadmoor's and a neighbor's claim against the city, which appeared in our March 23 issue.

A week or so after the planned March 7 publication of the Gazette story, Handy abruptly resigned from the newspaper. We haven't been able to find out more details as of yet, but will revisit this blog if and when we learn more.
 
  • Favorite

Tags: , , , ,

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Hunger, the Onion, Seth MacFarlane, and one surprised local woman

Posted By on Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:22 PM

screen_shot_2016-04-19_at_3.10.06_pm.png

The woman in this Onion  screenshot is Jenny Bealis-Schell, the co-owner of Design Rangers, a local Colorado Springs mom, and, apparently, something of a sudden celebrity.

In the last month, Jenny, who says she generally dodges cameras, has been featured in a web commercial seeking to raise money for hungry people and been featured in the aforementioned satirical article on the Onion, a story that was retweeted by Seth MacFarlane (the television producer, filmmaker, actor and singer who created Family Guy). She's also been the subject of many a commenter, including one who has insulted her "acting" and another who called her "annoying."

To say this has been surprising for Jenny is an understatement.

The genesis of this brush with fame began in the late 1970s. Jenny was 4 years old when her parents divorced. She says her dad didn't pay child support, and her mom, who worked as a waitress, often had little money. Mother and daughter moved to a piece of property that her mom got in the divorce, which was located in a ghost town just outside Victor, Colorado.

The cabin home had an outhouse, and no electricity or running water. For five years, mother and daughter scraped by, living in many ways as though it were the 1800s. Because money was scarce, Jenny was sometimes hungry. She fondly remembers neighbors who invited her to their homes for holiday meals, and a store that once gave her a bag of Christmas presents.

Her friend's family, she says, often watched her in the mornings before school when her mother worked early shifts. She remembers her friend's father making sourdough pancakes every morning. The food was a gift, as was the relief from her rugged circumstances.

“We didn’t have a TV and we had like kerosene lanterns," she recalls, "so just to walk into a house with electricity was a big deal.”

Because of her upbringing, Jenny has been eager to help the local food bank, Care and Share Food Bank for Southern Colorado. Last year, she was the keynote speaker at Care and Share's fundraising luncheon and she says she was thrilled that the nonprofit was able to surpass its goal. Afterward, she said people would sometimes come up to her at random and tell her they heard her speech and were touched by it.

So when Care and Share called her again early this year, saying they wanted to submit her story for a commercial, she was excited. Every year, Walmart does a fundraising campaign with Care and Share's parent organization, Feeding America. Walmart stores send a portion of the proceeds from certain products, as well as donations made at cash registers, to Feeding America, which uses the money to buy food. The campaign is called  "Fight Hunger, Spark Change."  

This year, Walmart wanted to film profiles of people who volunteered with a Feeding America food bank and run them as ads on the web. After a national search, Walmart selected two stories from Colorado Springs, including Jenny's. A director from London and a film crew from New York came to the Springs to film the spots.

They even took Jenny back to her old hometown for part of the shoot.

“Having the film crew with me was so surreal and emotional,” she says.


In late March, the web ads started popping up. Then, on April 18, friends alerted Jenny to the Onion article.  Despite the less-than-generous headline, Jenny says she was thrilled. She and her husband love the Onion, as does her college-age son. And she was also excited about being in a MacFarlane tweet.

“It still think it’s like pretty cool," she says of the Onion article.

Adding, “Finally I’m going to get cool mom points.”

As for the negative comments, Jenny says she isn't really hurt. 

 “I'm not an actress," she says. "So I don’t care if [a commenter] calls me a shitty actress, because I’m not an actress.”
  • Favorite

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Judge resists unsealing Dear affidavits

Posted By on Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:00 AM

Dear: A psychological evaluation is pending.
  • Dear: A psychological evaluation is pending.

For those following the increasingly protracted effort to gain access to search warrant and arrest warrant affidavits in the case of Robert Lewis Dear Jr., the accused Planned Parenthood shooter, it doesn't look like the public will learn very much very soon.

A coalition of media, including the Independent and the Gazette, is trying to advance transparency in the case. For details of this argument, check this out:
Motion_to_Unseal.pdf
District Judge Gilbert Martinez filed a 43-page argument recently for why he's right to withhold these documents from the public, along with 73 additional pages of transcripts form the Dear hearings.

Read his arguments here:
Combined_Honorable_Gilbert_Martinez_s_Answer_to_Order_and_Rule_to_Show_C....pdf
To read the Public Defender's Office's pleading in the case, representing Dear, click on this:

Answer_-_PD_-_Dear.pdf
The following was filed by the District Attorney's Office:

Answer_-_People_-_Dear.pdf
Lastly, the Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition executive director reports that Attorney General Cynthia Coffman has an opinion about it also:
By Jeffrey A. Roberts
CFOIC Executive Director

The judge in the Planned Parenthood shooting case defended his sealing of court records, arguing Tuesday that news organizations did not have a First Amendment or Colorado constitutional right to inspect the records while the police investigation was ongoing.

Answering a Jan. 27 order from the Colorado Supreme Court, state Attorney General Cynthia Coffman outlined reasons why El Paso County District Court Judge Gilbert Martinez was right to seal affidavits of probable cause in the case against Robert Lewis Dear. Coffman’s office represents the Colorado Judicial Branch on legal matters.

Accepting a media consortium’s arguments for unsealing the records would be “unprecedented in Colorado” and “contrary to the great weight of the case law,” Coffman wrote. Doing so, she added, would undermine the Colorado Criminal Justice Records Act, the Supreme Court’s rules on access to court records and “the important supervisory powers of the trial courts to protect ongoing criminal investigations and the privacy rights of victims and witnesses.”

Dear, 57, is accused of killing three people and wounding nine others during a shooting rampage at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Colorado Springs on Nov. 27.

The media consortium argued that Martinez’ order could keep the affidavits secret for more than a year, which would “deprive the public of knowing the most basic facts of what prompted government authorities to arrest Dear, to search his residence, and to file (a) 179-count criminal complaint.”

The media organizations urged the Supreme Court to clarify that under both the federal and state constitutions, “the public enjoys a presumed right of access to documents on file in Colorado criminal cases after the defendant has been formally charged…”

But Coffman, on Martinez’ behalf, presented arguments that neither constitution guarantees that right.

Her filing acknowledges, however, that three months into the case, the criminal investigation is likely over, “significantly diminishing the trial court’s concern that public disclosure would harm the process.” And because Dear has made statements proclaiming his guilt, “information that might have been previously sealed or redacted is now in the public domain.”

“Although the majority of the shooting victims’ names have not been released and would be appropriately redacted, these changed circumstances may render it appropriate to release the affidavits of probable cause in redacted form,” Coffman wrote.

The Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition also signed the media consortium's Supreme Court petition as did the Colorado Press Association, the Colorado Broadcasters Association and the Reporters’ Committee for Freedom of the Press.

Follow the Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition on Twitter @CoFOIC. Like CFOIC’s Facebook page.

  • Favorite

Tags: , , , ,

Friday, December 11, 2015

What do Coloradans Google more than other states?

Posted By on Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 4:50 PM

Ok. So this is interesting.

A real estate website called estately.com did a little research about what types of things each state Googles more than other states this year.

In Colorado the topics were:

• Syrian civil war
• Water on Mars
• Mass shootings
• Keystone Pipeline


Not surprising, really, considering we just went through the tragic Nov. 27 multiple fatality shooting at the Planned Parenthood clinic on Centennial Boulevard that killed three people.

As for water on mars, could it be that Coloradans are more space savvy, or are we just tuned in to the intrinsic value of water, considering rivers that begin here provide life to at least eight states and Mexico.

Keystone Pipeline? That's on a lot of people's radar who rely on oil and gas production in the northeast portion of the state.

What's interesting is what other states are most interested in. Take my home state of Kansas. Its residents' top issue was the World Series. No surprise. The Royals won. Arizona? Gun rights. Here's a map:

screen_shot_2015-12-11_at_4.31.44_pm.png

  • Favorite

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Most Commented On

Top Topics in IndyBlog

City Gov (6)


Politics (4)


Local News (3)


Elections (2)


Outdoors (2)


Most Shared Stories

Top Viewed Stories

All content © Copyright 2017, The Colorado Springs Independent   |   Website powered by Foundation