Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: Stories: News: Long Story Short

Re: “Dangerous work in the aftermath

http://www.njoybox.com
http://www.newyear2016-wishes.com
http://www.njoybox.com
http://www.newyear2016-wishes.com
http://www.njoybox.com
http://www.newyear2016-wishes.com
http://www.njoybox.com
http://www.newyear2016-wishes.com
http://www.njoybox.com
http://www.newyear2016-wishes.com
http://www.njoybox.com
http://www.newyear2016-wishes.com
http://www.njoybox.com
http://www.newyear2016-wishes.com

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Elle Setar on 11/18/2015 at 11:51 PM

Re: “Raising questions about excessive force

My name is Sean Carlos. I am a musician. From 6/27/2015 to 7/6/2015 I was held at CJC in Colorado Springs for missing a disorderly conduct court date related to playing music on the streets of Colorado Springs.

The first night I was imprisoned I refused an order by a sheriff's deputy to stop singing. I was placed in "irons", (my wrists shackled to my ankles), in isolation and left overnight. The following morning, after I was released from the shackles I noticed my left foot was partially numb. I requested medical attention and was refused help for two weeks despite multiple requests. When I finally received attention from the medical staff they confirmed the numbness and told me I'd see a doctor if the numbness persisted another week.

I was released as part of a plea agreement before I was seen by a jail doctor. The numbness in my foot has not improved. I fear I have permanent nerve damage. I am not currently employed and I have no health insurance. I am unsure how to obtain a doctor to fix my foot.

I feel my civil rights were abused. Not only was I not allowed to sing, but I was unjustly subjected to a tortuous experience that prevented me from getting any sleep that night. On top of that I have a permanent injury as a result of the deputies disregard for my personal safety.

I filed a grievance while in jail regarding this matter. On release I asked a member of the jail staff what would happen to my grievance. They suggested I contact the ACLU. I hope this matter can be resolved in a timely manner. I hope that feeling can be restored to my foot. I hope no one has to endure what I was forced to endure ever again.

Thank you for your time.

3 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Sean Carlos on 07/15/2015 at 10:30 AM

Re: “County officials: They get around

Another Pam Zubeck hit piece filed under the 'news' section.

2 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by PacksA9 on 06/11/2015 at 11:39 AM

Re: “Just do it ... better

Check out how the top contributions are distributed to each political party. It's not what you think!

https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php

0 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by _Mac_ on 04/23/2015 at 2:05 PM

Re: “The new Lutheranism

Lutherans that ordain women are not new. The predecessor ELCA Lutheran denominations included women ordained in 1970. The Missouri Synod is NOT one of three predecessor church bodies to the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, of which Bolz-Weber is a part. D Whitenack

2 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by D Whitenack on 04/17/2015 at 10:14 PM

Re: “From class assignment to cover

Enyone can master photography, you just need some imagination, and good will
http://justlookinto.com/blog/2015/02/04/trick-photography/

Posted by Mike Denison on 02/04/2015 at 4:41 AM

Re: “Growing up with the Chapel Hills Mall

If the owners had'nt given in to CORPORATE greed and killed the ONLY good thing they had(the ice rink, ONE OF A KIND). it would still thrive. THERE'S A DICK'S EVERYWHERE. only ONE indoor ice rink INSIDE A MALL. sad. But corporate greed over childhood memories and makin NEW ONES with OUR children who will NEVER KNOW such wonders, only CORPORATE BOX STORES. sad.

8 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Christopher Kringle on 12/18/2014 at 11:34 AM

Re: “The makers take over

www.pearliemae.net and https://www.etsy.com/listing/205401166/custom-made-swimmable-silicone-mermaid?ref=shop_home_feat_1

Posted by Jolene Oldham on 10/03/2014 at 3:01 PM

Re: “The American Dream and Colorado education

Everybody has a dream, and everybody want his dream come true. In most cases you have to work hard and it is subject to education, too. You have to study hard, become intelligent and acquire some skills that should help you in reaching your goals. Writing an essay is very important in receiving quality education. The essay helps students to develop critical thinking and research skills, as well as the ability to develop and logically defend a position. http://myadmissionessaywriting.com/ contains the fullest information about essay writing, its goals, common mistakes as well as tips how to develop critical thinking and start writing good papers.

Posted by KatyJordan on 10/02/2014 at 3:55 PM

Re: “The makers take over

"...and swimmable silicone mermaid tails." <-- that ought to reference the maker of those incredible tails. Pearlie Mae, whom you can find on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MermaidPearlieMae

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by KashKona Rose on 09/29/2014 at 12:08 AM

Re: “Some are more equal than others

I find my new home city, Seattle, very prosperous and the citizens work for common welfare, not to separate themselves to flaunt their freedom.

6 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by RayK on 08/17/2014 at 8:05 PM

Re: “Taking the 'fed' out of 'freedom'

Sorry, Dave. I thought your comment implied it was explicit. Good elaboration.

Posted by Mr. K-- on 07/23/2014 at 7:43 PM

Re: “Taking the 'fed' out of 'freedom'

"The Constitution does not explicitly give the Supreme Court the power of judicial review."

Did I say explicitly? No, I said "via". However, since you went there, "The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;" Now, while it does not explicitly say "judicial review", it pretty well describes exactly that.

And please note that Marbury was not the first case of judicial review. Marbury was the first case where judicial review struck down a law.

0 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Dave H on 07/23/2014 at 7:29 PM

Re: “Taking the 'fed' out of 'freedom'

Dave H, you are mistaken. The Constitution does not explicitly give the Supreme Court the power of judicial review. Chief Justice John Marshall, in the case of Marbury v. Madison, ruled a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional, reinforcing the doctrine of judicial review, which had only been a theoretical power before.

According to Wikipedia, "Historians mostly agree that the framers of the Constitution did plan for the Supreme Court to have some sort of judicial review; what Marshall did was make operational their goals."

The irony of the situation is that the provision the court struck down would have expanded the power of the Supreme Court.

4 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Mr. K-- on 07/23/2014 at 4:49 PM

Re: “Taking the 'fed' out of 'freedom'

"Who gets to decide what the U.S. Constitution really says?

A legal scholar would tell you that's the job of the U.S. Supreme Court. "

When it comes to legal precedent, the US Supreme Court is generally the correct answer -- ironically a power given to them via the U.S. Constitution, the very document they are supposed to interpret and apply.

However, it is really the people of the United States who are the final arbiters of what the Constitution actually says.

0 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by Dave H on 07/23/2014 at 3:27 PM

Re: “'Hey, taxi!'

Any skeptic of Lyft should try the service first for FREE

1. Download the Lyft app
2. Enter code LOSANGELES (works nationwide)
3. Request and enjoy your FREE ride
4. Repeat on another phone to get home

Posted by Ryan Ross on 06/21/2014 at 6:04 PM

Re: “'How much more risk ...?'

Does anyone know if this elected official can be impeached?--or maybe just charged with a crime and dragged into court?

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Mr. K-- on 06/17/2014 at 11:40 AM

Re: “'How much more risk ...?'

CSindyReader, The county is a subdivision of the state, and the elected officials are statutory, or perhaps even constitutional, which means the commissioners cannot make this change on their own. I don't know if a county can opt out of having their local elected officials, such as county treasurer, assessor and sheriff, appointed and not elected. Maybe a reader has a handle on what procedure would be necessary for this to happen.

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Pam Zubeck on 06/16/2014 at 4:32 PM

Re: “'How much more risk ...?'

Sheriffs' departments are notoriously corrupt regardless of whether the person in charge is elected or appointed. The bigger question is why the Republican party chose to continue to back Maketa in light of Pam's story several years ago. The time for partisanship and labeling one or another news organization "conservative" or "liberal," and thus more worthy of being listened to, needs to end for the sake of this city and county.

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Clara McKenna on 06/16/2014 at 11:02 AM

Re: “'How much more risk ...?'

Should someone with no integrity be in charge of budget, personnel, or criminal investigative issues?

Instead of a recall petition, the county should be considering whether it makes sense in today's world to have an elected official in charge of the Sheriff's department and propose a ballot issue to end the election of a county Sheriff.

What is needed now is a thorough housecleaning, yet the commissioners hands are tied due to an antiquated concept - i.e., electing a sheriff.

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by CSIndyReader on 06/16/2014 at 9:06 AM

All content © Copyright 2016, The Colorado Springs Independent   |   Website powered by Foundation