Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range
    • From:


Re: “Colorado Springs parks report shows good value

Comical and a big, "Duh!"... is the Broadmoor the new headquarters for the taxpayer funded Parks and Recreation Department? Planning the next chunk of historic parkland they intend to give away while assuming a behemoth liability?

15 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Dana Duggan on 01/12/2017 at 5:57 PM

Re: “Lamborn votes to give away public lands; the homeless, CSU and more

Bob Nicoll asks, "Want an orange slice?"

Watch out! A Trump (Registered Trademark) orange slice could cost as much as $25, plus tip for service, and chances are the supplier was stiffed!

44 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Mr. K-- on 01/12/2017 at 4:10 PM

Re: “Jesus and java converge at Third Space Coffee

Well thanks for the honest feedback. We'll try to improve as we love our city, just like you! Btw, My name is not spelled Roland, and I'm not from Fayetteville...fact checking, spelling for journalists?....details are always a work in progress aren't they?...guess the mission continues for all of us!

6 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by lrsmith on 01/12/2017 at 2:14 PM

Re: “Lamborn votes to give away public lands; the homeless, CSU and more

Lil Mick, you haven't got a clue what fascism is or isn't, you just throw the term around to try to feel superior, just as you throw out your family's past service, which, by the way, pales in comparison to that of my family. Plus, unlike you, I served as well and did multiple tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as serving in Bosnia and DESERT STORM.

General rule of arguments: The first person accuse someone of fascism is almost always wrong and is almost always an ignorant dickhead.

12 likes, 45 dislikes
Posted by Odin on 01/12/2017 at 11:58 AM

Re: “Council says no to parks ballot issue

... The City Council long-term has proven pathetic at maintaining city infrastructure whether it is the parks or roads. In the 1970's 1980's and early 1990's the roads and parks were properly maintained with the existing budgets. Our corrupt Council would then drain funds from those two groups - claim to the citizens "Were Broke" and beg for tax increases to cover for them subsidizing developer interests. Our developers/development fees are 70% LESS than the average of the other front range cities. Raise the development fees to be equal to our neighboring cities, fund stormwater with that and leave the parks/road maintenance budgets alone. This council is corrupt to the interests of developers....Let's see how much infrastructure costs they pass to the citizens for the Banning Lewis Ranch/Jenkins development !!

5 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Rick Laurenzi on 01/12/2017 at 11:19 AM

Re: “Lamborn votes to give away public lands; the homeless, CSU and more

I am 61 years old, my father and mother both enlisted in the Army to fight the spread of fascism in Europe, which would eventually have come to our shores.

I am speaking of WW II, my mother joined the Women's Army Corp, and my father was a 2nd lieutenant who fought on the front lines in France.

My father took a bullet from a German soldier, shattering his right arm and went through major surgery, grafting his thigh bone to repair the shattered bones in his arm.

He is a purple heart recipient and to me they are both heroes who fought to keep their children, grandchildren and great grandchildren free from fascism.

Odin and Bob Nicoll, you are both cowardly, ignorant, disgusting human beings and this country and world would be better off without either of you.

You fucking fascist bastards disgust me!

48 likes, 14 dislikes
Posted by Lil Mick on 01/12/2017 at 10:27 AM

Re: “Colorado Springs cancels buffered bike line experiment

I too live in briargate, a couple blocks from research and literally drive the entire length of it to get to work and never once received any type of notification. I don't have an HOA in my neighborhood and there were no visible signs posted either. I absolutely support more biking routes in the city, but taking away traffic lanes isn't the way to do it. I lived in Fort Collins for several years and loved the bike route structure there, you can ride all the way through town without having to share the path with dangerous drivers! That is more of what we need in this town.

12 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by llwmartin on 01/12/2017 at 8:02 AM

Re: “Colorado Springs cancels buffered bike line experiment

This article is the pinnacle of shameful and unprofessional "journalism" to the point of fiction writing. Allen Beauchamp is on the city's payroll as an adaptive bike specialist. Canadian-born Cory Sutela is a Manitou Springs resident and employed by Sram, a high-end bike manufacturer. (Is Sutela even a registered voter in Colorado?) Surely, both Beauchamp and Sutela receive some stipend for their Bike Colorado Springs roles that are grant funded by Colorado Health. One would like to believe Colorado Health's purpose in funding Bike Colorado Springs was fitness not political activism. Let's not overlook there's money to be made for Beauchamp and Sutela. Why not share those key facts, Tim Bergsten?

12 likes, 12 dislikes
Posted by Sandy Vicksta on 01/11/2017 at 9:43 PM

Re: “Colorado Springs cancels buffered bike line experiment

Where did the funding come for this Bicycling Experiment come from? We didnt have money to fix our potholes and crumbling roads throughout the city a few years ago. We had to implement a tax to get this taken care of. Public schools no longer have the funds for bus transportation. We are threatened every now and then that we cant afford our police force. So why are we spending money on several large salaries for this planning committee? How much money went into this failed project total? Not just salaries and related expenses, but their share of city resources they took? How long will they continue to spend money, time and resources on a failed experiment?

15 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Kathy Bohannon on 01/11/2017 at 9:33 PM

Re: “Council says no to parks ballot issue

Originally TOPS was just for acquisition and then was tweaked to allow a percentage for maintenance of TOPS properties. In 2013, citizens approved a change allowing a percentage of TOPS funds to be used for any City parks. The City abruptly took those funds and reduced the general fund commitment by the same amount. What special taxes like TOPS, PSST, etc do is set up for the City to rob the funds originally dedicated for those purposes. Parks are a role of government and should be covered under the general fund and to the extent allowed by TOPS. It is also important to note that TOPS has a sunset and without continuance, the City will scream bloody murder because they've a squandered much of what was previously dedicated from the general fund for parks. They've gotten accustomed to the extra dollars.

6 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Joel C. Miller on 01/11/2017 at 7:01 PM

Re: “Lamborn votes to give away public lands; the homeless, CSU and more

Sally and Odin I think something we should all be wondering. Why didnt Putin retaliate? Or When will Putin retaliate?

6 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Rocky Smith on 01/11/2017 at 5:17 PM

Re: “Colorado Springs cancels buffered bike line experiment

To those who seemed confused that the author isn't pretending to hide his agenda or to take it with a very large grain of salt. This article is listed under the columns heading (for the column titled Good Dirt) and not the news heading of the Indy. That means it's his take on things. It should not surprise you at all.

11 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Adam Jeffrey on 01/11/2017 at 4:52 PM

Re: “Lamborn votes to give away public lands; the homeless, CSU and more

Agreed, David Lien.

11 likes, 45 dislikes
Posted by Odin on 01/11/2017 at 4:25 PM

Re: “Lamborn votes to give away public lands; the homeless, CSU and more

Very true, Norm Bangeman

12 likes, 45 dislikes
Posted by Odin on 01/11/2017 at 4:24 PM

Re: “Lamborn votes to give away public lands; the homeless, CSU and more

LOL! Nice one Bob Nicoll!

11 likes, 48 dislikes
Posted by Odin on 01/11/2017 at 4:24 PM

Re: “Lamborn votes to give away public lands; the homeless, CSU and more

"How sweet to hear that D.T. thinks Putin's decision not to retaliate after the U.S. imposed sanctions is smart and a "great move." " -- Sally Alberts

So Sally, what you are saying is that you wanted Russia to retaliate. Nice to know.

11 likes, 47 dislikes
Posted by Odin on 01/11/2017 at 4:22 PM

Re: “Council says no to parks ballot issue

TOPS should be reworked as the source of money for park maintenance. It was an oversight that all of its funding go towards acquisition, as at some point you won't be able to maintain what you purchased.

3 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by LivesLocally on 01/11/2017 at 4:17 PM

Re: “Tim Mitros is latest to "retire" with severance pay

I am sorry to see another great city employee pushed out. Speaking of Fleet Management, they are now in year 4 with Serco has the City been saving any money?

2 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by runrep on 01/11/2017 at 4:03 PM

Re: “Colorado Springs cancels buffered bike line experiment

To the generous open arms Pizza Time offer. The city's repeated deceit and name calling of the citizens of Briargate, the bike advocacy's rejection of objective discussion throughout this entire episode, and as demonstrated by this very article to continue to cast residents in a negative light by carefully abused references, I think I will have to decline your offer for open discussion because I cannot trust you. If you want trust, you have to earn it back. You betrayed me. I have always been a supporter of on road bicycles and you wouldn't even give me objective discussion in return for it. You need to earn my trust back.

13 likes, 10 dislikes
Posted by Scott 1 on 01/11/2017 at 2:58 PM

Re: “Colorado Springs cancels buffered bike line experiment

Mr.Bergsten is so biased in favor of bicycles that anyone who reads this article should take it with a very large grain of salt. Among the distortions that Mr.Bergsten has in this article are "vocal group of citizens". The group of citizens is actually much, much larger than the tiny group of bicyclistas who, like Mr.Bergsten, believe narrowing Research was anything more than idiotic.

Another of the distortions was, "wildly misleading information" given by Ms. Marshall. As verified by Ms Prtichard's comments above, there was no notice given to her. So, who is writing "wildly misleading information"?

19 likes, 9 dislikes
Posted by Sojourner on 01/11/2017 at 2:15 PM

All content © Copyright 2017, The Colorado Springs Independent   |   Website powered by Foundation