"Americans have a right to disagree with all branches of government when we think they're wrong." But you never said you disagreed with the Supreme Court. You said the court should not be trusted. That undermines the judiciary.
I disagree with some court decisions, but I trust that the justices are honorable and working as hard as they can to arrive at just decisions, and I trust our system of government will eventually correct any mistakes they make, because our system provides for such corrections. It is true that judges can be corrupted and bribed, but I doubt you have any evidence that any Supreme Court justices have ever been guilty of those crimes.
Most important, by accepting the court's rulings, however you may disagree, you just might avoid turning a serious dispute into a bloody war. By sowing distrust you guarantee that even minor disputes will end in violence.
Mr. Skycastle, I see you did not bother to deny that you are a troll on Putin's payroll. Is that a tacit admission that you are indeed an anti-American, pro-Russia troll?
Afraid Jim Mullen is telling it like it is.
Tomorrow Friday April 14 we will hold signs and pass out leaflets concerning the amount of tax payer money going to the military (about 50%). We'll be at the downtown Post Office from 12 -1. See you there. Spread the word. For more than 40 years there has bee a similar gathering in Colorado Springs.
Is Doug Bruce using the name Skycastle on this board? Doug, is that you? Sure sounds like you!
More insider dealing in our local club of the well connected. It's way past time to clean house in this city.
Don't expect him to say anything; he's the biggest nothing in Congress.
So glad the idiotic concept of a downtown air museum died so quickly, it was a terrible idea, one of the most insipidly stupid schemes ever. We have both an airport (WITH AN EXISTING AIR MUSEUM !!!) and the USAF Academy nearby to host such an attraction and do so in the right context. We have great air museums in DC, Seattle, Dayton and other places, we don't need to plunk one down here, at least not at taxpayer expense on prime city land far from any airport. Good grief.
Council should investigate why such a bad concept even got traction with the mayor in the first place. What it means is a good old boy club of local USAF retirees manages somehow to exert inappropriate influence on local politicians. With all the billions in the USAF budget let them build their own museum and stop trying to pick our pockets. There are enough millionaires and well to do types in the ranks of USAF retirees that they should chip in THEIR money to build a museum to their branch of the service.
I say NO NO NO to using any local tax money for any military museum. It's ridiculous, just like the City for Champions was a terrible idea foisted on us by the same developers who foisted the "strong mayor" scheme to pave the way for C4C. Stop as much of C4C as you can. Stop this creepy insider dealing. When outside developers find that this city isn't reserved for the same bunch of local insiders then maybe we'll get some really good outside investment here. But that's still a long shot given TABOR.
Regarding the high regard people and corporations have for Boulder and Denver, ask yourself these questions: Are there any megachurches in Boulder? Are their roads paved as a routine matter of good maintenance, good government, and not an emergency? Have they de-TABOR'd in those places?
SCRAP the crooked "strong mayor" scheme crammed down our throats. STOP unelected dudes (Jenkins, Anschutz, Schnuck, et al) from wreaking their greed upon us by only needing to buy up just that one politician. The strong mayor scheme was step one in a brazen set of plans that included C4C as step two and who knows what hides up their sleeves as steps three and four, etc. RETURN power to the people. Now.
Bill, I respect people like you who support the Constitution. I'm with you here - I've been a strident supporter of the Constitution for decades. I believe in original intent - which is how our Founding Fathers' wrote and understood the Constitution. Unfortunately, most supreme court justices no longer support original intent. They prefer to re-interpret the Constitution whenever it suits them, even when their interpretation is opposite what our Founders intended. That's federal lawlessness and judicial anarchy, and we're living under it. It's become so bad that today we have a federal government which routinely violates the Constitution, while claiming to uphold it. And since most Americans have such a poor understanding of the Constitution, it's easy for the government to violate it with little outcry from citizens. If people don't understand it, how can they defend it? This is the problem I always have with online discussions people who lack even a basic understanding of the Constitution (especially in regard to limited federal power) - yet have strong opinions about it.
You wrote: Why put your trust in them? How about because SCOTUS is a co-equal branch of the government created by the Founding Fathers in the CONSTITUTION.
Yes, SCOTUS is part of the federal government, but our Founders NEVER told us to put our trust in government not any branch. Do you understand this? Instead, they urged us to remain vigilant and keep government under control. That's why Benjamin Franklin is famous for saying that they had given us a republic if we can keep it. Because it's up to us the people to protect our Constitution and our rights. We can't just hand our brains over to government, assuming that govt. must be right. That way lies tyranny, for an ignorant and complacent people are easy to control and manipulate.
You wrote: you think your opinion is right and SCOTUS is wrong. You got that backwards. Really Bill? Why? Why must SCOTUS be right? If they understood the Constitution, why would the justices disagree with each other so often? Why would they ever have 5-4 decisions? Obviously, a law degree doesn't guarantee proper understanding. That's why it's so important for people to be able to think for themselves. If we can't freedom will die. An ignorant population will be unable to protect itself from federal abuse of the Constitution, and their rights will be continually trampled until freedom is dead. That's what's happening today. People who can't think for themselves are called sheep, and they need a shepherd government to guide them in all things and protect them from themselves.
You wrote: Your eagerness to dismiss SCOTUS reveals your contempt for everything in the Constitution that doesn't make you happy. It's not a buffet where you can pick and choose. It's the CONSTITUTION, and you don't get to reject SCOTUS and then say you're just following the Constitution.
So Bill, do you see where you're wrong here? You're confusing SCOTUS with the Constitution, and the two are very different. Our allegiance should be to the Constitution itself not to a group of people who mangle it continually with their idiotic interpretations which aren't even based on original intent. SCOTUS treats the Constitution like a buffet I don't. Here's an article I wrote about this issue, so please read it:
Councilors should explore ending the strong mayor scheme foisted on us by developers the other year. We don't need one person acting alone to run this city; we need a city government "of the people" not "of the developers."
Underhanded to hide opportunities from others in the community.
Mr. K, does your opinion on an issue change when the supreme court disagrees with you? What about when they disagree with themselves? That happens often, and this proves that a law degree doesn't guarantee proper understanding. If it did, then the SCOTUS justices would always agree with each other. BTW, that's rare.
As for Undermining the judiciary, all Americans have a right to disagree with all branches of government when we think they're wrong. Are you under the impression that presidents, congressmen, and supreme court justices are always right? Do you hand your brain over to them to think for you? It's sad that you refuse to think for yourself. That makes you a sheep. And of course, sheep need a shepherd. Government will gladly lead and control you all your life. Dumb people make their lives easy, because they're too befuddled to disagree.
Norwood will get it's million dollar investment in buying a new form of government back on the Olympic Museum deal.
What is so depressing about CS is not so much the Right Winger nuts here all over... because we expect them to do as they do. But it is the supposed opposition to them that is even worse dealing with since they're such milquetoast Right Centrist Democrats.
'You could feel the instant anticipation, almost palpable, after the results came in April 4 for the 2017 Colorado Springs city election.'
Jesus. The instant boredom of people like Routon, Weiss (Indy publisher), and Skorman is that there is actually no 'palpable' change ahead in anything here locally. These folk are also MIC lovers, too. Sick.
A downtown Public Market - YES. Mike Callicrate of Ranch Foods Direct has been a long-time proponent of this. About 3 years ago Callicrate was ready to commence converting a warehouse into a Public Market in SW downtown, but Jenkins (correct me if it was some other property owner/developer) put a stop to his property purchase, telling him it was designated for C4C redevelopment. To the C4C developers, a Public Market in downtown COS was not a Great Idea. Instead, the visionary icon-obsessed developers wanted skyscraper condos and office buildings that would produce mega City tax subsidies and high profits. Experience of other cities proves that a Public Market is a guaranteed attraction for tourists and locals. Seattle's Pike Place Market has fish. COS Public Market has beef - or would have it ever gets built.
City Council is drawing up a To Do list, which includes utilizing the City Auditorium as a Public Market. I think Callicrate's original indoor/outdoor market space concept is a better option, but regardless, make this happen. And council member Jill Gaebler - a known proponent of local food - should be the designated councilor to do whatever it takes to make the downtown Public Market a reality.
I'm just curious. If people love Boulder and Denver so much, why not move there? I think they are both wonderful cities in their own respect. I don't want to live in either place. I love COS. It's a beautiful city with wonderful people. We don't need to become another Boulder or Denver. We need to be the best COS we can be. And that means allowing the people of COS to say what they want--to vote on what we, the citizens, believe is best for our city. If anything, Boulder and Denver have something I think would be great to incorporate into COS and that is a 16th street mall area. We need a place where people can come together of all socio-economic facets and every other distinction. Think public market which has floundered for years because of no assistance or support from the mayor's office, developers, or the city. Having seen firsthand the energy of two public markets in DC, and Ponce Market in Atlanta and knowing how much they bring to areas, this would seem to be a solution. In recent local surveys, a public market/gathering space was much higher on the list than a stadium. Seattle Pike's Place (the 33rd most visited tourist spot in the world--Annual Visitors: 10,000,000). Another one is from my old hometown of San Antonio. Why not combine stormwater efforts with creating a tourist-friendly Riverwalk with restaurants, shops, apartments, etc. SA's Riverwalk Annual Visitors: 11,500,000. Connect it to a market like the Faneuil Hall Boston Annual Visitors: 18,000,000 or incorporating the bus/trolley and maybe later, train terminal like Union Station DC Annual Visitors: 40,000,000. When people visit the Springs they come to see and experience all the beauty of our area. I love museums. They are great. But let's do something that we lack. A third space for our residents and tourists that combines apartments of all sizes and costs, shops, restaurants, public transportation, outdoor spaces, concert venues, etc. This will create an energetic downtown and will energize our economy.
Cswilliam: "it takes broad based tax revenues, and great governmental leaders, in partnership with visionary developers, to assemble the resources - financial and technical - to create something new and great. "
Translation: "assemble the resources"=taxpayer dollars when we're told daily there's not enough for critical roles of government like roads, stormwater and public safety.
How about these visionaries invest THEIR OWN money and not ours? Not one dime of private
money was pledged for the stadium. Nobody should have any problem with the free market making people wealthy who take risks. In the case of our downtown, taxpayers and the public are asked to take the risks, make the investment and the developers are then first at bat to reap the rewards and become wealthy on the taxpayer dime--cronyism and government picked winners and losers. Just because this ridiculous chapter is temporarily closed no one should think it's over or not ongoing.
Cswilliam, people here HATE being compared to Boulder and Denver for some reason.Oh wait, fuddy-duddies and a lot of old farts who simply hate change. Seriously. To them it's an insult. I would love it if we were more like those two cities. Vital, open-minded and NOT so darned conservative...besides most of our downtown is rife with bars and more bars. Another family is seeing to that....
Worth noting Food Maven does not/will not/cannot sell direct to the public. They supply restaurants, who are facing increases in food costs without ability to raise prices do to market thresholds, schools, institutional food service, and other places that food costs at a large scale is an issue.
They also give a TON (or should I say tons?) of food to local food kitchens, food banks, and other nonprofits who feed those who are going hungry on a daily basis. In Southern Colorado I heard a number around 25,000 people each week don't get to eat 3 meals a day or even every day.
Food Maven is taking food from places like Safeway, King Sooper's, etc... who'd normally let the food go to waste and in some cases literally throw away perfectly good food. They are then selling it to our local restaurants at a killer price that can help them get the margins they need to stay in business.
I don't see this hurting Mike's business. I will always go to a local burger joint for my local burger, and if a model like Food Maven allows a place like say McCabe's get it's buns & fries cheaper for my burger so they can make a profit and still afford to offer a premium product like Callicrate beef well so be it.
The House takes off for two weeks, during which Lamborn will spend a scant 5 hours, over only three work days, meeting with the Constitutents of his Congressional District. What a guy.
All of today's events | Staff Picks
Submit an Event
All content © Copyright 2017, The Colorado Springs Independent
Website powered by Foundation