Thats what I wanna know. What can I do to help?
What can I do to help??
I'm thinking that putting "moms" in "parentheses" was snarky because it questioned who was really behind the movement. As far as being anti-gun and using the term "lifelong hunter" - well, there you go again...snarkin' away. If you doubt my credentials and sincerity about my views then say so. I don't get a big charge out of pumping up my manhood by pumping out a thousand rounds or so at the range - I'm a helluva lot more secure than that.
I AM a lifelong hunter. I got my first semi-auto .22 for Christmas when I was six. I started bird hunting when I was 12, hunter's safety class under my belt and all. My father won the European Skeet Championship in 1956 - the essential world championship at the time. I loaded clays into the thrower from the time I was eight until my father retired from skeet and trap. I have a top-notch bird dog, and always buy a hunting license to support the Dept of Wildlife.
Wyman, without actually knowing me or what I stand for, and without actually knowing these "moms" who would like to see sanity restored with a few well drafted requirements, you come off as the snarkiest of all. My father-in-law is an NRA Life Member and 7 time FL Senior Silhouette Champion when he competed. I was on the 3rd Armored Division 1000 meter team in the 60's. The NRA was an admirable organization until they got caught up in Wayne LaPierre's hair-on-fire political aspirations. They should have stuck to education about firearms safety and competition shooting programs for youth...with emphasis on safety. LaPierre is a paid shill for the gun industry and you're one of the suckers who buys his pap.
Regardless of the MDA's credentials the concept is good. If you are afraid to go outside without your gun then you are also afraid of your shadow. Standing up to the NRA is something that requires courage in today's political climate. I don't belong to the NRA, and until they change their ways, I won't belong.
the gun nuts will go as far to accuse the crazies that open carry their assault rifles to be paid actors...riiiiight. they don't have to be paid to act stupid... the common sense gun laws are gaining momentum and that must anger the gun lobbyists. the laws will change and it will make the country safer... period. the gun lobbyists will cry "they are coming for our precious guns", but they know it isn't true and they are only trying to sell more guns. these lobbyist are paid a lot of money and need these guns to be sold.
What is "snarky"? "Lifelong hunter" is a phrase many anti-gun advocates use and only thet use it. Nice try...
This story is a bit glossed over about Watts and her backing by billionaire ex New York mayor (the guy that banned big soda cups). Watts was a PR person for large corporations including the Indy's favorite Monsanto. She also in essence forced her young son to watch the endless news coverage of the Aurora theater shooting for several hours. Next night she takes the boy, 8 years old, to a theater to see that same movie and the kid freaks out! Well, duh! She rushes him to a shrink and yes the diagnosis is a panic attack. Good mom. Child abuser. She launches her group. But someone who investigated reveals that the website and domain name have been purchased already, weeks in advance, and she is up and running in two days. She collects money, spouts falsehoods, uses the "mother" name ploy, has a contingent of armed bodyguards while her gatherings draw tens of people. Watts hires actors to portray "open carry" protesters to "disrupt" her outings. The actors look and act like buffoons which then she can point and say "See. I told you so." She even went as far as calling police one time claiming that those gun toting maniacs were going to rape her and her little group. She is all about money and nothing more. Her group has no momentum. She is an abuser of children and The Independent did no homework before writing this story.
I will add that anti-Second Amendment zealots have gone as far as they can go. There is no debating our Rights and we understand what those Rights are. The "loophole" "common sense" "assault weapon" tripe is worn out and there can be no law that violates our Rights. It is a ban they want but it will never happen and it is not their place to take anyone's Rights. The MDA has had to pad the stats to make shootings sound commonplace which in fact are rare and occur mainly in gun-free zones. They have gone as far as changing the definition of "child" so more are added to their child victim list. To the MDA anyone 25 or younger is a "child". Congratulations for not recognizing a charlatan, I am not surprised though, you actually were trying to fool your readers.
Spot on, John Howell.
"says the group is not anti-gun but does advocate for "common sense gun laws." "
Yeah, that is what they all say. That is the mantra of Michael "32 Oz"/"Colorado Springs doesn't have paved roads" Bloomberg's groups Everytown and MAIG, of the Brady Camp (formerly Handgun Control Incorporated, formerly National Council to Control Handguns) which was part of the National Coalition to Ban Handguns (now Coalition to Stop Gun Violence), of Americans for Responsible Solutions, and others. If you truly believe them, I have a metric Crescent wrench I'll sell you.
"Common sense" means different things to different people and is a "poisoning the well" ploy to paint anyone who disagrees as not having any sense. To some people, banning guns is common sense. To others, banning handguns is common sense. To others, banning so called "assault weapons" is common sense. To yet others, exercising concealed carry or open carry is common sense, or owning multiple firearms including handguns and "assault weapons" is common sense.
"The first ensures all gun buyers pass a background check — whether buying from a licensed gun dealer, a private citizen or a gun show. "
A law which actually makes very little sense.
"The second states that domestic abusers cannot own guns, even if a state classifies domestic abuse as a misdemeanor instead of a felony,"
Which is actually redundant with previously existing federal law and therefore makes no actual sense. They have been working to pass a law to make something that is already illegal, illegal.
"The group also takes credit for defeating some 200 "bad laws" in states, including those that would allow guns on college campuses or in K-12 schools."
Again, what they consider a "bad law" is actually considered by many to be a "good law".
"Colorado passed a package of gun control laws in 2013, including expanded background checks and limits on ammunition magazines. "
Both of which were great examples of actual bad laws.
There are a bunch of tents set up along the Midland Trail, just past Chestnut Street, that are a bit scary to ride by. I was waiting to either be jumped or run over a hypodermic needle - that's just the impression given by the disarray of this "camping" site. The camp that was mowed down along the creek just before America the Beautiful Park still has a ton of trash and clothing/sleeping bags strewn about. I've always thought the HOT guys did a good job, but the slant of this story makes me think differently.
Gee whiz, John...that was kind of snarky, don't you think? Why in the world would they want to do that? The concept of universal background checks might actually do some good - and open carry in Georgia that allows open carry in bars, of all places, a law that was strongly supported by your NRA buddies might even do a better job of thinning the ranks.
I'm a gun owner, a lifelong hunter, a combat veteran and a good citizen. I support the MDA!
Many thanks to these "moms" for reminding Americans to renew their NRA memberships and to include an extra contribution.
Great article! The purpose of Howard's deal, as stated in the severance agreement, is "to amicably and completely resolve any and all matters" between the city and Howard, although those "matters" aren't explained. By the way, my children wanted HUD-51000 some time ago and were informed of a great service with a searchable forms database . If you require HUD-51000 too , here's "https://goo.gl/BCELrv".
As an aside, those of you out there that are drawing military retirement and benefit from Tri-Care - do you really think you have a dog in this hunt other than your personal wish to not have to pay more to help "the least among us" because you've "served your country" and have no further obligation to the community?
Dang - for once I agree, at least in part. The Federal Government should be the target of these lawsuits. Admiral Elmo Zumwalt approved the use of 2,4,5,D (Agent Orange) in the Vietnam War. His son, a Swift Boat captain in the Navy came home after having been exposed and died a few short years later. Was that karma calling, or was that the most horrific way one could learn of a horrible error in judgement that happened because of insufficient research on the contaminant...or was it just plain ol' Government doesn't give a crap activity? I know that Admiral Zumwalt felt the pain personally, but as far as there being any real assumption of responsibility...well, corporate America doesn't work that way. And neither does the USAF.
I totally agree that the suits will not go very far, but it doesn't mean that they don't have standing. Please proceed, folks, and hopefully the light of day involving the complicity of the Government and the chemical companies will be exposed.
I've been communicating with the ColoradoCarYES folks and am completely satisfied with the answers. Of course the big insurance carriers don't like it - they've been skimming off the premiums and denying coverage for years (like back to 1973) and they sure as hell don't want to lose that plum. Think of that 30% slush fund for a minute or two and figure out how doctors and nurses are hurt by potentially being paid more for their services. I was assured that I would be able to continue to see the doctors I currently see and that the system would not be a Medicare/Medicaid duplicate. No wonder all the big guns are out and firing at this amazing concept of paying doctors more and not limiting care. Big Pharma has to be getting nervous, too.
To: Lroberts Roberts
No it is everyone's business when the law is changed because it applies to everyone: the elderly person in a nursing home who is lonely and told it would be better if she died or the cancer patient who is told he can't get expensive treatments but the state will pay for assisted suicide (this happened more than once in Oregon). You may not be concerned about these people, but I AM.
It's no ones business except the decisional adult and their physician. It's called freedom. If it's not for you, don't do it.
Never give up on treating your cancer and diabetis for there is a cure and my husband was once a cancer patient, am wesie ryan living in Belgium. Two years ago my husband suffered from lungs cancer and diabetis the doctor told us that nothing could be done, I was so frustrated and the thought of loosing my husband was so unbearable that I lost all hope.
One faithful day my daughter told me that she had found a cure for cancer and she found it on the internet. Although i didn’t believe her I watched it anyway just to please her and after watching it I discovered that it brought my hope back and i wanted to give it a try.
I and my daughter started searching for legitimate source that could provide the hemp oil that would cure my husband. We read a lot of testimonies online of how a lot of doctors has helped a lot of patients cured their cancer with hemp oil and it was on one of this sites we found a sole distributor of RSH oil,olokum, we contacted him Via his Email: email@example.com or call +19147094469 or add him on whatsapp +2348158836673 which we found in the testimony we read.
RSH oil is the best ever, I followed his instruction and now my husband is healthy and I am so excited. doctor can cure diabetis, hiv/aids, warts and alot more.
Thanks to RSH oil for helping my husband cure his cancer with his and for also making life worth living once again. We all love you jon wesie.... God Bless
It's just a tough pill to swallow, as a long time Colorado Springs resident. c/s has some responsibility of maintaining parts of the incline and Barr trail. Most users of the incliners are from the Springs and most of the $$ donated is probably from c/s. So we pay for it, tax dollars go to purchase and maintain, fight for it, give our land(strawberry fields) and we get nothing from manitou! Other then the "your unwelcome here" sign when you try to park! Where's the long term solution if this doesn't get the results they want? Just keep raising parking? What about the alternative route down and parking at the bottom? We gave up strawberry fields for what? This? Cause this sucks. We get screwed again.
She only mentions Spanish-Colonial Art. What about all of the Native American & other southwest pieces?
This happened today at Northglenn High School. 09/29/2016. I confronted one of the men about my concerns as a parent and how they hang around a school and give out bibles. I told them it's not right that they hand out anything without a parent's approval. I wasn't there to agree to it, so they are in the wrong. I'm very angry that they reserve the right to hand out anything. For all we know one of these men may be a pedophile. Seriously, how do we know? It's how us parents view this. We have to protect our children from everything and for these men to put fear into the parent's eyes and showing us that anyone can do this outside of school grounds is concerning that the state and federal government are letting this happen. Isn't there such a thing as 'Parent's Rights'?
All content © Copyright 2016, The Colorado Springs Independent
Website powered by Foundation