Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: stories: Columns: Letters

Re: “Strawberry Fields, farm animals, Wayne LaPierre, Donald Trump, and more

Be forewarned, I only read the first three words of a post, to get the feel.

0 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by onepercentre on 06/01/2016 at 11:49 AM

Re: “Strawberry Fields, farm animals, Wayne LaPierre, Donald Trump, and more

"Your "sovereign" life is a product of global forces, spoiler alert"

My life, with all it's ups and downs, positives and negatives, assets and liabilities, is a construction built and shaped by myself, as is yours, so please spare me the suggestions that we're mere pawns on a global board.

This country is unique in offering opportunities found nowhere else--ask an immigrant--and if you still can't capitalize on the inherent benefits of being on these shores, then you lack the motivation, education, skills, etc. to leverage self-improvement, or do those diabolical, external forces--you know the ones that hire and provide income--conspire to keep you down?

It's far easier to blame others for personal fiscal malaise, but it ultimately serves no purpose or benefit, and just paints you as someone requiring scapegoats to justify your own failure and ineptitude.

3 likes, 11 dislikes
Posted by LibertyForAll on 06/01/2016 at 11:46 AM

Re: “Strawberry Fields, farm animals, Wayne LaPierre, Donald Trump, and more

Your "sovereign" life is a product of global forces, spoiler alert.

Posted by onepercentre on 06/01/2016 at 11:33 AM

Re: “Strawberry Fields, farm animals, Wayne LaPierre, Donald Trump, and more

Obama's Pacific trade agreement will prove a decisive death blow to American manufacturing. Trump will get rid of it and NAFTA. PLUS you can get all kinds of protein on your very own! Right? Roadkill4all!

0 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by onepercentre on 06/01/2016 at 11:16 AM

Re: “Strawberry Fields, farm animals, Wayne LaPierre, Donald Trump, and more

Your stunted, stilted, juvenile view of how macro-Economics works is laughable at best, as there are far more machinations driving a capital-based, entrepreneur-driven national economy than simple taxes, tarrifs and debt manipulation.

Lemme guess: you think the solution to excessive governmental oversight and regulation of the economy is...more government? *sigh*

You're obviously a "1%er", but at the other end of the spectrum. Best wishes in improving your lot in life; you're gonna need a miracle to succeed, but even a rudimentary understanding of fiscal matters would be a fine start, and I hope you undertake such an educational quest.

0 likes, 13 dislikes
Posted by LibertyForAll on 06/01/2016 at 10:56 AM

Re: “Strawberry Fields, farm animals, Wayne LaPierre, Donald Trump, and more

The government uses tariffs and debt leverage to throttle the economy that produces your paycheck, and it trickles down your face to your lips on the way to your belly. NAFTA not food stamps or whatever you thought, lunkhead.

1 like, 3 dislikes
Posted by onepercentre on 06/01/2016 at 10:40 AM

Re: “Strawberry Fields, farm animals, Wayne LaPierre, Donald Trump, and more

"the government determines the actual amount of money in your personal wallet and the type of food in your belly"

Perhaps, if you're a subservient, boot-licking regressive, and this will be shocking, but there are still multitudes within the populace that still think, act, do and fend for themselves and who don't rely on the Feds/Big Gov/the Nanny State to care for them from cradle-to-grave.

I'm curious; how does someone else's wealth affect your personal, individual, intrinsic ability to acquire some of your own? Is there some secret cabal of blue-bloods plotting ways to keep you down in a hidden grotto somewhere?

"How will the skill-deficient middle class compete with robots in the workplace? There doesn't seem to be much incentive to work harder for less" - They'll compete by increasing their skill set/s, education levels and core competencies so they're more valuable potential assets and resources, and as for working harder for less; please explain how arbitrary, non-value-added minimum-wage increases help employers.

Sounds like you're contemplating relocating to the "Great White North"; enjoy some Molson, back-bacon and a failed universal health-care system...

4 likes, 12 dislikes
Posted by LibertyForAll on 06/01/2016 at 7:29 AM

Re: “Strawberry Fields, farm animals, Wayne LaPierre, Donald Trump, and more

"We call a dead cow steak, hamburger, etc., but never a dead cow"

Well Aubrey, essentially, ALL our food is dead, whether it walked around or was rooted in place, and I didn't advance to the top of the food-chain to munch only arugula.

Living, sentient beings consume other ones--that's the way it is--and if we're not supposed to eat animals, then why are they made out of meat?

I suppose you'll tell me that you never "Eat anything with a face", but I have it on good authority that if you ask nicely, they'll cut that part off before serving, so let me know if you're ever in town, and I'll treat you to a plate of brisket and/or ribs!

8 likes, 13 dislikes
Posted by LibertyForAll on 06/01/2016 at 7:15 AM

Re: “Gutter politics, street narrowing proposal, abortion, and more

Gentry expresses my opinion to a T. While Lathen professes to be a fiscal conservative and Gaebler is a Hillary acolyte, they are birds of a feather in that both are big defenders of the right of COS developers to do whatever they want with our tax dollars. Both women support building a $300M downtown stadium using sales tax revenue without a vote of the citizens. And Gaebler thinks COS should revisit the BLR annexation issue and give hundreds of millions of dollars to Jenkins for infrastructure, in spite of the fact that last year the Judge ruled saying ALL development costs are the responsibility of the developer. Wasn't building the SDS that cost utility rate payers $1 Billion so that Jenkins would have water for his BLR enough to pay in infrastructure?

It is so very refreshing to read Linda Knight's letter exposing Gaebler's arrogance and disregard for the opinions of people who don't share her POV. The Gazette fawns over this proponent of higher and higher taxes - just as it did over Lathen - quoting her every driveling remark on whatever issue is on Page 1. It's obvious to even the most politically obtuse that Gaebler has been chosen by City Leaders for higher office. And, most importantly for her goal of being a Career Politician, she has the financial backing of her developer cronies. Which is worse - Gaebler as Food Commissioner or Gaebler as Mayor?

7 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by curious on 05/27/2016 at 6:02 PM

Re: “Gutter politics, street narrowing proposal, abortion, and more

Related to Linda Knight's comment -the city, since the '40's - - has been most fortunate to have had a succession of city council members that have ranged from good to excellent with few 'problem cases'. Getting to gender differential, dating back to Margie Vasquez in the '70's to Lisa Czelatdko and Jan Martin most recently, there have been some very effective and powerful women on council who exercised their opinions and discharged their duties with a high degree of civility.

Jill Gaebler does not fall into that category! The level of rude behavior and the arrogance and condescending attitude of Gaebler - matched only by that of Amy Lathen soon to join the political action committee: "Colorado Springs Forward" does not bode well in whatever effort might be planned to offset the reputation of the community as one of politically divisive, poisonous and fractured as identified by findings brought forth in the 2009 Project 6035 Report.

Lathen will, most likely, be yet another 'failed' leader who have already come and gone through Colorado Springs Forward faster than crap passing through a goose as they try to become relevant to the community.

What are the chances Gaebler can make it without being subject to a recall?

11 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Robert Gentry on 05/25/2016 at 8:03 AM

Re: “CC land grab, safety-sizing streets, Trump's lies, Anschutz in charge, and more

Miss Chambers Its not just Anschutz it his wallet and a few other wallets. When you buy a Politician you get favors or they use there influence to discredit you. Thats why he bought the newspaper thats what hes doing and the Voters are just happy to follow follow follow the money brick road. Jenkins has been doing it for years around here and the citizens keep getting screwed and yet they vote them right back in. If your truly tired of it use your vote and check someone else.

8 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Rocky Smith on 05/18/2016 at 4:53 PM

Re: “Potholes and 2C, conservative politics, land swap, Trump, and more

It's an insult to every citizen that our city council begged money for pothole repair. From 1975 till recently ???? This was a normal part of operations and maintenance of our roads. Now we get a special tax for it...how irresponsible. Pothole repair equipment/personnel should be a permanent part our the city crew just as potholes are a permanent art of the landscape. What next.....they'll ask for a special tax to change the oil on their fleet vehicles and have it done by Jiffy Lube ! ....

4 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Rick Laurenzi on 05/16/2016 at 8:16 AM

Re: “Potholes and 2C, conservative politics, land swap, Trump, and more

The curbs gutters and sidewalks were funded by a grant about 8 years ago in order to in compliance with the ADA. Or so we were told when we called the street dept and asked. But it wouldnt shock me if 2-C money was being funneled that way we all know how this city works.

4 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Rocky Smith on 05/12/2016 at 9:53 PM

Re: “Potholes and 2C, conservative politics, land swap, Trump, and more

Mr Gearloose. Obviously you and Jere Joiner read the same articles. How about use your common sense and just open your eyes as you drive around town. FYI when a city engineer says something remember, they work for the city, not us.
1st The WHOLE reason for 2C was the potholes and road damage, very little of which is actually next to a curb.
2nd I have no problem with curbs, just the misuse of funds in building them. As curbs and gutters are a part of water management, they should be repaired with storm water funds, not with road funds.
3rd Pay REAL attention to how much road damage around town actually touches a curb. Maybe 5%.
4th You were snookered, and you are wrong.

1 like, 3 dislikes
Posted by Wisdomplease on 05/12/2016 at 8:48 PM

Re: “Potholes and 2C, conservative politics, land swap, Trump, and more

Mr. Gearloose. Like Jere Joiner you are wrong. I suppose you read the same story somewhere. 1st Open your eyes and see how many of the actual problems are in the middle of the road as opposed to the curb area. About 95%.
2nd Curbs are drainage and should be paid for with storm water funds.
3rd The WHOLE reason for 2C was in response to pot holes and road damage, very little of which are actually adjacent to a curb.
To recap. You were snookered and are wrong.

1 like, 4 dislikes
Posted by Wisdomplease on 05/12/2016 at 8:35 PM

Re: “Potholes and 2C, conservative politics, land swap, Trump, and more

Drake the drain is correct Forte keeps pouring in Millions of rate payer dollars. He has vowed to make the scrubbers work at any cost to the rate payers. Good job Jerry!

3 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by Solar Sam on 05/12/2016 at 8:19 AM

Re: “Potholes and 2C, conservative politics, land swap, Trump, and more

Mr Duncan, The curbs need to be repaired and brought up to federal standards prior to repaving. If the curbs aren't repaired first, water gets under the asphalt and damages a brand new surface.

10 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by gyrogearloose on 05/11/2016 at 2:30 PM

Re: “Land swap, bullies like Springsteen, nukes, clean energy, and more

TruB I know that and Im sure I know who it is by the same stupid rhetoric he has spewed many many times before. But I enjoy shutting down "know it all's" that truly dont know anything.

Posted by Rocky Smith on 05/03/2016 at 12:08 PM

Re: “Land swap, bullies like Springsteen, nukes, clean energy, and more

Mr. Liberty for all:

"Do you agree with the decision/s to drop the warheads on Hiroshima and Nagasaki back in August of 1945?"

My question to you is: have you been to either city?

I have, and I can tell you that it's a sobering experience.

To the extent the first strike may have been justified (although that's not entirely clear), the second bomb was literally overkill of 75,000 people who were vaporized. The Japanese had initiated private peace talks with the Soviet Union in July, 1945. Negotiations were terminated after the Soviet Union declared war on Japan on August 9, 1945. Then the second bomb fell.

That second bomb was unnecessary.

Next question.

2 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Bill W. on 05/03/2016 at 8:34 AM

Re: “Land swap, bullies like Springsteen, nukes, clean energy, and more

Rocky - Liberty is just looking to argue. I mean he asked a question to a letter expecting a response. He isn't look for liberty or making a point. He just enjoys wasting peoples time with his switchcraft.

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by TruB on 05/03/2016 at 12:47 AM

All content © Copyright 2016, The Colorado Springs Independent   |   Website powered by Foundation