Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: stories: Columns: Letters

Re: “Reader: Lamborn should have a town hall for childish liberals, then another for the adults

"This rude woman didn't want to realize that her right stops where ours starts. We have the right to listen to our congressman without interruptions." To do this, go to his YouTube page where you can listen to him constantly without interruption. I wasn't at that town hall to hear what HE had to say, I was there to hear what HIS CONSTITUENTS had to say TO HIM. He needs to listen to US at a town hall, not the other way around! I sat quietly at the town hall, but not out of respect for Lamborn, I sat quietly out of respect for my friend who desperately needed to get his attention to continue to get care for her son. I sat quietly out of respect for the 12 year old girl fighting for climate change. I sat quietly out of respect for the veteran fighting for veteran care. I sat quietly out of respect for the woman with her well researched chart filled with FACTS about how the middle class pays for most of America's healthcare. NEVER for Lamborn.
https://www.youtube.com/user/CongressmanLa…

50 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Jessica Lawyer on 04/21/2017 at 9:28 AM

Re: “Reader: Lamborn should have a town hall for childish liberals, then another for the adults

If you want to listen to your Congressman without interruption, you have countless opportunities for that. Read his newsletters, follow his social media, attend his ridiculous tele-town halls, or call or write his office to get his canned statements, just like that room full of liberals has been doing. It's about time he start listening to US. We've heard what the Congressman has to say, over and over and over. We're fed up. Perhaps you should do your homework before attending the next town hall, like the liberals did, and you'd know what he has to say.

52 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by Candi Frank on 04/21/2017 at 9:13 AM

Re: “Reader: Public broadcasting is a worthy investment

Six dislikes. Wow, just people that think their Government is entitled to fund things they like because nobody else does. Well not nobody but hey I play along. Just remember if you choose to bully me, I will bully you back.

1 like, 11 dislikes
Posted by Don McCullen on 04/20/2017 at 4:18 PM

Re: “Reader: The Academy Chapel is a beloved national monument, you crazies

The Establishment Clause was never, ever meant to prohibit religion in public life, and all the screaming and squalling and red-faced, foot-stamping temper tantrum throwing by the secular Left will not change that. That became more certain with the appointment of Justice Gorsuch. I must admit that the temper tantrum throwing is entertaining. God Bless the USA, and God Bless the USAFA Chapel.

5 likes, 23 dislikes
Posted by John Howell on 04/20/2017 at 9:49 AM

Re: “Reader: Public broadcasting is a worthy investment

religious freaks and "shallow thinking conservatives" are stupid... they gave us the grabber in chief who doesn't give a rats rear about your fairy tale or poor hard working non-progressives.

11 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by happyfew on 04/20/2017 at 9:29 AM

Re: “Reader: Public broadcasting is a worthy investment

Anyone who uses 'snowflake' to defend his own insinuation that a letter is calling him stupid is thin skinned.

11 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by TruB on 04/19/2017 at 2:18 PM

Re: “Reader: Public broadcasting is a worthy investment

Gina's response to my letter only proves that America public media truly does appeal to progressives leftists like herself and is run by those who favor Big Centralized Government shaping our culture. Let us look at one of her quotes.

"I think, more than anything, corporate shills like Lamborn want to prevent another Mapplethorpe being funded. Mapplethorpe's art, funded by the National Endowment for the Arts, helped shape the change of public opinion that led to legal gay marriage and wider acceptance of LGBT people. That kind of change terrifies our corporate masters, because it creates unpredictability."

Gina is referring to a photographer named Robert Mapplethorpe who died of AIDS/HIV in 1989. According to her; its people like Mapplethorpe (at taxpayers expense) who helped America become more tolerant of the LGBTQ...MOUSE (my emphasis added) and accepting of redefining marriage to not being limited to one man/one woman. Since she brings up the NEA (not the teachers union); let me remind you of Andres Serrano who got a grant for taking a jar and taking a leak into it and dumping a crucfix into it (Piss Christ). God does not exist but yet you want to mock God and his possible existence and those who do believe that God exists. Would Metallica ever hear of him without this grant? By the way Serrano's work 'Semen and Blood III' graces their 1996 album "Load." Gina would say yes. I say not necessary. They may have or not have known about Piss Christ. Still Gina Douglas give the impression that most people are stupid, and we need Government to enlighten us to the works of people that Gina prefers.

I don't read John Grisham but he writes books that have mass appeal. He was interviewed by public TV's darling Bill Moyers as well.

Their are forms of public media I do admit I enjoy. The popular News Information format is not one of those forms. However the Public Radio News/Talk stations according to Arbitron are the most listened to public radio formats overall. KQED -FM in San Francisco and WAMU in Washington DC have been the most listened to radio stations in their respected markets. KUOW in Seattle and KNOW in Minneapolis-St. Paul has been ranked in the top five; and WGBH-FM and WBUR in Boston are in the top ten. While this not the case in every market the most listened to public radio station is the one broadcasting a News oriented format which includes NPR's flagship shows Morning Edition and All Thing Considered. These big stations do get a lot of taxpayer support thanks to their matching grants given to stations that have been able to raise a significant amount of money. It is just another wealth redistribution scheme.

Gina thinks that people like me are stupid. That is just propaganda from snowflakes like her who hate the free market and free enterprise (and corporate America has bent over backwards for the LGBT Community and they are not dirt poor overall) and look for any excuse for a Government that is leaning towards European Socialism if not Soviet styled Communism instead of the limited Goverment envisioned by our founders (regardless if they were Christian or Not)

2 likes, 15 dislikes
Posted by Don McCullen on 04/19/2017 at 1:15 PM

Re: “Reader: Trump is only playing to his rich constituency

Perhaps liberals may reconsider their choices next time an election rolls around. What is worse than a Democrat president? A lawyer president. A woman lawyer president. In the list of career choices for psychopaths "lawyer" is number 2. If you think Trump is not qualified then consider this:being black is not a qualification nor is being female.
Our legacy is The Constitution and if the writer is so concerned about our legacy then perhaps you all could maybe stop fucking with that document (and The Bill of Rights are a part of it, not simple Amendments as some think.).
I too am a non-rich American, in fact I am below the poverty level. And over 60...

1 like, 1 dislike
Posted by Bob Wyman on 04/18/2017 at 7:18 PM

Re: “Reader: We know where this destructive administration is headed

Beautifully written!

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Nancy Masterson Reinking on 04/18/2017 at 6:14 PM

Re: “Reader: We know where this destructive administration is headed

China's success is the result of President Richard Nixon's foreign policy. He opened up trade with China to drive a wedge between them and the Soviet Union.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Mr. K-- on 04/18/2017 at 6:07 PM

Re: “Reader: We know where this destructive administration is headed

I wonder why then Frank has the BLOTUS has gone bankrupt several times - hmmmm.

Because the supporters of the current administration rage in comments about protests I suspect they also understand the power of protest. This power concerns them.

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by TruB on 04/18/2017 at 4:47 PM

Re: “Reader: We know where this destructive administration is headed

Leon Trotsky Lives ?

Socialist/Communist Dogma is dated, you go Bankrupt.

China has overtaken Russia in just 35 years by measuring Performance, NOT Politics.

It Takes a Market !

2 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by frank1946 on 04/18/2017 at 4:50 AM

Re: “Reader: Trump is only playing to his rich constituency

As a non-rich American, I'd like to express my strong support and best wishes to President Trump.

5 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by John Howell on 04/17/2017 at 8:43 PM

Re: “Reader: Whose nose is bloodied by climate change?

nice well written letter!! the science deniers and our grabber in chief are set to take us, and the rest of the world, back 20 years. we can't let stupid people make decisions for the rest of us... when profit out weighs the health of our population we are doomed.

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by happyfew on 04/17/2017 at 9:50 AM

Re: “Reader: This is Trump's agenda

Skycastle wrote, "...power over the environment, wildlife, education, and health was never given to the feds..."

curious affirmed, "He's right and all those who disagree with him are wrong."

Then, curious, why do you "thank Trump for nominating - and the Republicans for confirming - Betsy De Vos"? Education is one of the powers you, yourself, say is reserved to the states and forbidden to the federal government. Yet, you are okay with the feds interfering with the states to promote your pet projects, "School vouchers, charter schools, and home schooling..."

That is called a double standard.

4 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Mr. K-- on 04/16/2017 at 11:39 PM

Re: “Reader: This is Trump's agenda

"...I, not so brave..."

Don't be so hard on yourself, curious, and don't sell yourself short. You are in this every day and I have never seen you back down. And you are one the few--possibly, the only one here--to consistently admonish anyone engaging in gratuitous name-calling. I say this as someone who is more often in disagreement than agreement with you.

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Mr. K-- on 04/16/2017 at 1:42 AM

Re: “Reader: This is Trump's agenda

"School vouchers, charter schools, and home schooling are the only means of raising up a generation of freedom loving Americans..." who will gleefully sell that freedom we love so much to Vladimir Putin!

I am only a member of the "ignorant citizenry," but maybe some semi-pro Constitutional scholar can explain to us which article allows Russia, or any foreign power, to choose our president for us.

5 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Mr. K-- on 04/16/2017 at 1:23 AM

Re: “Reader: Whose nose is bloodied by climate change?

Foolish statements of a crazy person.

2 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by Stacy in Woodland Park on 04/15/2017 at 2:47 PM

Re: “Reader: This is Trump's agenda

Agree with Skycastle on everything he says about the Constitution. He's right and all those who disagree with him are wrong. The ignorance of the citizenry re the Constitution is the fault of the public govt schools and the socialist teachers who are brainwashing their empty-headed idealistic students, who exit the schools thinking that diversity, racism, equality of outcome, and climate change are the problems needing fixing so that utopia can be achieved.

I thank Trump for nominating - and the Republicans for confirming - Betsy De Vos. School vouchers, charter schools, and home schooling are the only means of raising up a generation of freedom loving Americans.

It is BRAVE of Skycastle to present this opposing viewpoint in the Indy blog, and I, not so brave, applaud him.

1 like, 4 dislikes
Posted by curious on 04/15/2017 at 12:22 PM

Re: “Reader: This is Trump's agenda

Skycastle:

" Why must SCOTUS be right? If they understood the Constitution, why would the justices disagree with each other so often? Why would they ever have 5-4 decisions? "

Seriously...you're embarrassing yourself. SCOTUS is the final arbiter of what is and what is not Constitutional. If you don't accept that (and it's been that way since 1803), you are a traitor your own country and its Constitution. When SCOTUS rules, it is by definition the LAW OF THE LAND.

http://www.history.com/topics/marbury-v-ma…

When you say "think for yourself," what you mean is "reject the government." Sorry. I won't do that.

I disagree with a lot of SCOTUS decisions, particularly as they apply to the 2nd Amendment and campaign financing. While I disagree, I still accept those rulings as the law of the land. That's the country we live in...a nation of laws, not a fantasy nation stuck in the 18th century.

Incidentally, you constantly bring up 5-4 decisions. Those split decisions have EXACTLY the same legal effect as any 9-0 decision. Your assertion that a close decision is suspect on its face is indefensible.

Dissent is routine and protected by the First Amendment. But for those who think we are living under a runaway unconstitutional rogue government, I have one piece of advice. Find a country...any country...that is better.

You can't.

4 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Bill W. on 04/15/2017 at 11:44 AM

Today | Fri | Sat | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed
“Federal Marijuana Policies and Racial Discrimination”

“Federal Marijuana Policies and Racial Discrimination” @ CSU-Pueblo's Hoag Hall

Thu., April 27, 7 p.m.

All of today's events | Staff Picks

All content © Copyright 2017, The Colorado Springs Independent

Website powered by Foundation