The Gazette has long contributed to the negative perception outsiders have of the Springs. It really is a damn shame this town can't get a community oriented daily.
It is truly a shame to see this small attraction go away due to some people who seem to believe Bear Creek Park should be their own private reserve, rather than a beautiful regional park, one of which has a long history of horses. The hysteria by people who would be minimally impacted by this was over the top. Should this lovely piece of property be developed into housing, the impact to the park and adjacent neighborhood will be far greater, and far more negative than a small, well maintained stable.
Quote:"from a Colorado Springs pastor " who? did it name them? what church was he with ect.ect.ect. it sounds suspect for sure....
I've been profiled again! This time, it's from Noel Black and Jake Brownell of NPR member station KRCC. My support system has grown in Denver, and Jake and Noel interviewed them, including Greg Nieto, reporter for CW2 KWGN and FOX31 KDVR in Denver. Click to listen to the whole episode.
If you have been here for thirty or more years you will remember the past. It was not until the big box Xtians arrived that we became this way. Xtian H8ers and intollerance. Gimmee back those good ole' days.
Churches must pay taxes!
more religious endorsed hate spewed by the holier than thou "christians" of this backwards village. the repubicans are using this as their new "get the poor people to join us" social issue. the momentum of history is on the side of equality... repubicans and unfortunately our village will stay in the past and will only move forward kicking a screaming like the entitled old farts that run this god forsaken place. jesus would be so proud...
Could it be that those the community needs to move in to increase economic stability and to grow jobs are not moving to the Springs because of the people who are here?
When you look at the history of our Colorado Springs, the epicenter of the Amendment 2 controversy that earned Colorado the "Hate State" epithet, Suther's silence is resounding. If he feels that he has the election sewn up, therefore why bother signing on with or openly rejecting the response to the first ad, then this tells me that his mayoral style will follow suit. He will continue to ignore important issues, he will allow these divisions to fester. He will engender little to no transparency. He will continue the status quo that turned the lights off in our city. You can enjoy Throw-Back Thursday every day of his tenure.
In the Venn diagram of Christianity and LGBT, the center of overlap is growing. We know where one candidate stands with this because she signed her name openly for all to see. And in spite of the odds she keeps striving to be the voice for all people in our city. Vote for tolerance and inclusivity. Vote Mary Lou Makepeace.
Please. "Christian bashing seems to be pretty safe"? Are you really unaware that the initial ad was a direct attack on our LGBT brethren? Or that most of the people who affixed their names to the second ad would identify themselves as Christian? As a Catholic who consider himself a fellow-traveler of the LGBT community, I'm disheartened that a simple response in support of a historically marginalized group against a call to action for intolerance towards a law-abiding and vital part of our city, state and country gets belittled as "Christian bashing". Such a characterization is Orwellian double speak of the highest order. Are you truly that threatened by those who are different than you? Why not reach out in the spirit of compromise, as Ms. Cathey evidently did in offering an alternative wording to her ad, which would not have offended those who object to the very term LGBT? Truly, for her to have done so means she was more than willing to meet halfway those who are uncomfortable with her very existence, even though it meant denying hey own objective truth about her own unalterable identity. Think about it.
Since John Suthers barley missed an outright 50% in the first election, it's safe to say he really doesn't need the Christian vote to get elected anyway. Everybody seems to read more into an op/ed than is really needed and Christian bashing seems to be pretty safe around here. But woe to any that dare disparage LGBT. They seem to have a "If your not for us your against us" mentality. Nothing could be further from the truth. Just a difference of opinion for crying out loud.
This doesn't need a conspiracy, the lines were drawn a long time ago. Get your ballots in and make sure your voice is heard.
Interesting that the new ad, which was supposed to be about fairness is now being used to criticize individuals who simply decided not to sign it. Was this supposed to be a political tool? By Ms. Cathey's final comment, "Blog away...they used their own rope on this one..." it appears she cares more to divide than to unify. She should apologize for turning the new ad into a political talking point that she can use to criticize others.
The timing of this is suspect; okay, I always smell conspiracy and refuse to write off such events as a coincidence. The ad gets placed, the planned controversy erupts, Suthers says nothing which shows his support for that hateful ad, and by doing that Suthers takes the local evangelical vote and wins the runoff election. And the local evangelicals don't even suspect they've been played for fools. Again.
Gee, another crazy preacher making our city a laughing stock. No wonder Mayor Bach threw in the towel and did not run again; he cannot bring 6000 good jobs per year to a town reeking of putrid illiterate small-minded hate for their fellow man.
"Photographers must take risks, but they must know when to make an exit, also. "
Very true and something many amateur news & weather social media posters fail to understand. I am constantly seeing pictures and videos on social media where idiots have shot images from way too close to danger or in an otherwise unsafe or even illegal manner.
Example: During many of the floods I have seen people standing right on the banks of overflowing creeks and ditches, not realizing just how easily they could lose their footing or have the bank give out.
Example: During snowy weather, we repeatedly see pictures and video clearly taken from the driver's seat, which is not only completely unsafe, but also illegal -- even if stopped at a stoplight.
Example: People taking videos of tornadoes when they should be in a shelter -- remember, a tornado warning does NOT mean run to a window or outside and look for a tornado, it means get your butt into a shelter and stay there until given the all clear.
Rocky, just because they got in a pissing contest over who to blame for the fires, doesn't mean they put it out. Just ruined a couple pair of expensive Italian loafers.
Gee CS I thought Bach and Our great Sheriff were the ones that put the fire out single handed. Didnt you read his book? HE HE HE
We watch rule and review videos for great overviews of game rules - it's so much easier than one person having to read everything out loud. One of my kids is a great gamer and loves to help learn the games as a test player, too. Those two things have smoothed over teaching new games to less patient folks in our household.
For some games it's easiest if you can bribe (food or beer?) a friend who knows how to play into hanging out one night and teaching everyone.
Some tape shot that day, before and after and an animated map and flyover of the burned area.
Starting at 9:30am on the 26th since with the trough out east, the weather was guaranteed to be howling SW chinooks, I thought it would be a good day to cover the fire. Ended up at Coronado HS:
...and the people say thanx to the heroic firefighters (didn't see 1 sign thanking bach for sitting on his butt):
This is pretty sweet. Both Floyd Tunson and Wylene Carol were my teachers at Palmer.
Thanks for filling the world with art!
All content © Copyright 2015, The Colorado Springs Independent
Website powered by Foundation