Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range
    • From:


Comment Archives: stories: Columns: Between The Lines

Re: “Colorado Springs Airport flies through turbulence

It is also cheaper to go to DIA than to fly out of here in most cases. Everytime you change planes you risk getting stuck for one reason or another...go to DIA and you go right where you are headed without changes and delays. I never even think about booking out of Colo Spgs...besides the TSA here are doing work release and are the most unpleasant people to encounter, darn near spoiling any trip. No thanks.

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by TejonTech on 02/05/2013 at 8:26 AM

Re: “Colorado Springs Airport flies through turbulence

The worst part of losing Frontier is having to rely on the United look-alikes. They cancel flights way too often - sometimes for the flimsiest of reasons - leaving you stuck in Denver or with extremely long connections.

Posted by UCanSeeClearlyNow on 02/05/2013 at 7:26 AM

Re: “Colorado Springs Airport flies through turbulence

Tech: You are a bit of a cynic, are you not? If you believe, as your comment seems to indicate, that it is more convenient to go through DIA than the COS airport, you live in a fantasy world.
And, I believe one of the points of the article was (although perhaps not specifically stated), if we had another airline, we would likely have more direct flights, avoiding the need to "change plains in Denver".

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by siggie on 02/05/2013 at 6:03 AM

Re: “Colorado Springs Airport flies through turbulence

It is just quicker to go to Denver than go single file through the one lane of security ever open at our airport...and then you have to change plans in Denver anyhow.

Posted by TejonTech on 02/04/2013 at 3:12 PM

Re: “Ferrandino: Dems' busy leader

You all forget, Ralph get a tinkling feeling up his leg for anything don't get too excited about the gushing prose.

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by TejonTech on 01/19/2013 at 11:20 AM

Re: “Ferrandino: Dems' busy leader

They are too busy trashing Rev Nori and gay marriage.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by gurudori on 01/19/2013 at 8:32 AM

Re: “Ferrandino: Dems' busy leader

This must be a first for a newspaper in COLO SPGS: the word "gay" appears in a column and not a single hateful comment from our christians the first 2.5 days.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by OldCrank on 01/18/2013 at 9:17 PM

Re: “Train shows all of Colorado

Thank you for the travelog, Steve, er, Ralph.

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by longtooth on 12/12/2012 at 7:59 AM

Re: “Can Anschutz take our daily back to the future?

With the Internet, everyone who still takes a daily delivered in print paper will be dead from old age before the paper can hire a staff from the dwindling numbers who do print's as done as church.

0 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by TejonTech on 12/05/2012 at 6:33 PM

Re: “Can Anschutz take our daily back to the future?

Stephen, yes the GT had 85 percent household penetration. I think for a brief time that even crawled into the low 90s, maybe for a few months. Staffers received monthly reminders of that -- way back in the 60s and 70s, but it is true. Also, during that time, the GT was the only daily paper with subscriptions from east of Colorado Springs to Limon, basically along US 24 and Colorado 94. That includes the Free Press/Sun, the Rocky Mountain News and the Denver Post. I doubt the Pueblo papers sold in that area, either.

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Morris Fraser on 12/05/2012 at 1:34 PM

Re: “Can Anschutz take our daily back to the future?

I can only take Scott's word that the Gazette ever had 85% penetration. It sounds unbelievable but any such number appears only distantly in the rear-view mirror. The paper now appears more like an pamphlet while its price tag has kept pace with inflation nicely. The libertarian editorial philosophy tune played so stridently on its one-note guitar for so many years, I believe, did what it intended to do: it shaped the older newspaper-reading segment of the community into thinking taxes should never be raised, and nothing apart from the sparest actual government facilities should ever be owned by the city. I believe it hardened the already calcified opposition to offering and paying for any service apart from police and fire. Our city turned off street lights to save money from the utility company it owns. That looks pretty pathetic to the rest of the country. If we are in for a doubling down of that viewpoint, the paper will appeal to fewer and fewer, and continue to contribute to the erosion of the community instead of its growth. A city (no longer just a town) benefits from a rational, dependable, comprehensive common forum and vocabulary which a newspaper can provide.

4 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Stephen Bowlby on 12/05/2012 at 11:24 AM

Re: “Can Anschutz take our daily back to the future?

1. I appreciate that you, a competitor, would say nice things about the sale and the paper's history. Some of your readers probably would not be as kind. And, of course, you were part of the excellence way back then.
2. Indeed there were, and are, outstanding reporters and writers still working who were at the G when we were. "Outstanding" is the right word. I don't know any who are still there that I would not want to be associated with. Flat-out truth: anyone who disagrees doesn't know those people.
3. One of those veterans told me the newsroom feels more stable. After some of the events we experienced in the 80s and 90s, I feel so much better about the company. And a former photographer commented that he felt the need to pack up his cameras and go back, then said, "Oh, wait, I'm retired." I kinda-sorta feel the same way.
4. Enjoy the new competition, emphasis on "enjoy".

5 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Morris Fraser on 12/05/2012 at 9:30 AM

Re: “B-word: not the solution

The B-word got enough attention to deserve an article. Why wouldn't it be used. Money is the only thing downtown businesses understand. Don't like the Boycott? Post a sign outside your business stating your objection to the big brother overreach of the city council and mayor

Posted by Daniel Freysinger on 12/01/2012 at 5:12 AM

Re: “Let's do it: America's Olympic City

How about cheap utilities, a skysox team in a field where they're happy (check!) and the hall of fame? I do like that idea!
I hope the local government will be cleaned up and out so as not to tarnish the Olympic name...

Posted by Drive Iam on 11/28/2012 at 11:16 PM

Re: “Let's do it: America's Olympic City

Great idea! The Springs has a unique and powerful marketing opportunity with being the home of the USOC. No other city in the world has it. And, everyone in the world knows US Olympics. In fact, the US Olympic team is the best sports team in the world! For Colorado Springs, its better than being home to the Broncos, the Yankees or the Lakers.

Though the idea of a Sky Sox stadium downtown is appealing, it pales in comparison to a US Olympic Hall of Fame downtown. We're talking minor league baseball versus global sport. Let's focus on what makes the biggest impact, first. Make it happen and CS will be equated with the best in sport world wide. Can't beat that!

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Antelope on 11/28/2012 at 7:44 AM

Re: “Sequestration: What now?

Doug Lamborn wil take care of this for us...we won't feel the effects at all. Thank goodness we have an effective leader like Doug Lamborn.

I hear Doug has a plan to file impeachment articles against Obama for Benghazi too.

Thank goodness we have such a strong man representing us in Washington. Not!

3 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by TejonTech on 11/07/2012 at 10:13 AM

Re: “Sequestration: What now?

Read an article that The COS EDC invited three leading U.S. senators regarding defense spending and possible spending reductions.

UCCS Chancellor Pam Shockley-Zalabak welcomed Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., members of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee, and other elected officials including Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colorado Springs, and staff from the offices of Sen. Michael Bennet and Sen. Mark Udall. They primarily spoke about “sequestration,” which refers to the $1 trillion in cuts the Pentagon is required to make over the next decade under the Budget Control Act of 2011. The bill was part of a bipartisan attempt to balance the federal budget.

With such an important issue facing Colorado Springs, that could have devastating consequences on our City, where was your fine Mayor Steve Bach?

4 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Comshaw on 11/07/2012 at 9:32 AM

Re: “Bach: 6,000 jobs, redefined

We will hopefully know on Wednesday morning...if Obama gets another four years gas prices will continue to rise, jobs will be depressed by the overwhelming burden of universal health care, taxes will go up and spending will go down...there will be a general malaise that will see many downtown operations boarded up.

0 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by TejonTech on 11/05/2012 at 10:02 AM

Re: “Bach: 6,000 jobs, redefined

The Real Numbers: why do we need to check other sources to get them?…

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Donna Knight on 10/31/2012 at 8:42 AM

Re: “Bach: 6,000 jobs, redefined

Sunlight beating down on dry leaf will not cause it to erupt in flames.

Focusing sunlight and intensifying the heat through a magnifying glass will.

Focus and direction.

Focus and direction in job creation can create 6000 annual jobs.

Who, in the region is that magnifying glass?

An old chamber with a reduced budget and new logo putting out fluff?

The city with no real econ development team? The county who has a record of opposition to incentives?

The need for an intensely well-qualified “leadership team” is the greatest current regional need. One team to focus the region's 'sunlight' into focused energy.

Without it, will we see the northern tier Colorado cities of Boulder, Longmont and Fort Collins take over as the lead ‘growth communities’ in Colorado leaving the Pikes Peak Region in the dust?

6 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Richard D.Wehner on 10/31/2012 at 7:03 AM

All content © Copyright 2016, The Colorado Springs Independent   |   Website powered by Foundation