As a combat veteran who has studied the research done by Israel over the past 4 decades and self-medicated (illegally until I came back to CO) I understand a bit about how the CB1 receptors function and how cannabinoids act as a buffer to lessen the effect on the synapses. That said, I would hate to imagine my life without the ability to soften some of the ongoing symptoms of PTSD that was exacerbated by mTBIs suffered from muzzle blasts of countless rounds of outgoing artillery. The prognosis without CBDs and MMJ would be bleak indeed, with my condition degrading to Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy, a condition that won't even be diagnosable until my autopsy is performed - not looking forward to that, personally.
The archaic, misdirected machinations of the DEA, FDA and USDA have engineered an about face on CBD derived from the hemp plant - that innocuous member of the cannabis family that, by international definition, contains less than .3% THC. This is a direct play by the FDA and Big Pharma and not without a little help from the MMJ industry heavyweights to keep affordable CBD out of edibles because they have declared it an "adulterant". This, too, is why elections matter!
Many people pick up after their pets, packing out the bag on the way back from their hike. Unfortunately, some folks think their work is done once the stuff is bagged. Poop in a bag is twice as bad as poop on a trail. And: poop in a bag tied to a tree is just the worst! Seeing that one time was weird. Seeing that more than once makes me think that some people are just nuts. Finally, don't toss those bags down a hillside; that does not make them disappear. Pack it out.
THis is why all elections matter
Tannim, if you think Gary Johnson has a snowball's chance in hell of being elected - wait - I already said that! Apparently it didn't take. Trump is a thug, he hangs out with thugs, he answers to thugs and splitting the vote would make it possible for that thug to win. No freakin' way!
In a state that already has its share of stoners Johnson proved one more time in Denver that he was right at home. No offense meant - I partake as well...but I'm pretty sure you wouldn't elect me to office and I'm usually pretty lucid. Johnson isn't.
The more I read of Trump's tax reform ideas the more I'm sure that it's going to look like a 'flat tax' scam. I say scam because it doesn't work for those living paycheck to paycheck. A simple comparison will show the huge disparity: Let's say taxpayer A makes $650,000,000 in a given tax year and is forced to surrender 10% of that booty to the Federal Government. Gosh that's a whopping $65,000,000! But it leaves him $585,000,000 to scrape by on. Taxpayer B, on the other hand, is a waitress or a college student working his/her way through school and makes (and this is more generous than reality) $10.00/hr. Let's also assume that these folks manage to work 40 hours a week...tough for both of them, one a single mom and the other a full time student. That's $20,800 a year. With a flat tax of 10% that's $2,080 to the Gov't, leaving a tidy sum of $18,720 to pay rent, maintain a car, pay for child care, food, etc, etc. I'm sure there's enough for savings and a ski trip to Switzerland left in there somewhere...
Trump is not a real estate developer - he's a gambler and a risk taker who owns and operates casinos around the world. If he has a casino on the Black Sea (Sochi, anyone?) then who does he pay homage to in order to keep operating? I would surmise it's the Russian mob, and we all know what a fine bunch of upstanding citizens they are. If he owns a casino in Macao (mainland China) then the controllers there are the Chinese Tong that run gambling there. And does this infer that he has 'business' dealings with organized crime in this country? Well, I suppose, but they don't call themselves that here anymore - they call themselves casino operators.
If you still have questions about this man then look at the gang of thugs he hired to operate his campaign - Paul Manafort and Rick Gates, who may be getting indicted for not registering as lobbyists for the Ukraine when the Russian backed strongman Yevtushenko was running the country; Roger Ailes, who was just dismissed from Fox News for sexual harassment of his female employees; Steve Bannon, who was the CEO of Breitbart and is the darling of the white supremacy movement. That's just the group we know about. This dolt (T.Rump), is a bully and a thug.
As the son of a WWII POW and a Vietnam vet I am offended by his treatment of both of our groups - and everyone who has shared those experiences should be as well. you can scream Benghazi/emails as loud as you want, but nothing compares to bankrupting 4 business, costing thousands of jobs, breaking investors and avoiding responsibility. According to him, that's just 'good bidness', and it makes him a genius. As far as his integrity, he either lied to his supporters in the primary debates when he said he didn't have anything to do with 'pay to play' for a casino in Florida, or he lied in the deposition about the same issue. And then there's the Trump Foundation that was told to stop raising money in New York because it wasn't properly registered. Some businessman!
Wake up, people! The two main characters who have been sliming Hillary Clinton for the past 25 years are running his campaign. What kind of garbage do you expect to come out of that duo?
Len Bentley writes:
“We are divided by a force far more dangerous to liberty than things like ethnicity. We are increasingly divided between makers and takers, and the takers are winning. They represent a huge portion of the Clinton constituency.”
Len, please allow me to introduce you to a man named Donald Trump. Recent revelations disclose just WHO the “takers” REALLY are, and they ain’t the single mothers working two minimum wage jobs who “take” advantage of food stamps, and who will vote for Hillary Clinton.
You are a victim of the viral myth perpetrated by people LIKE Donald Trump who have successfully distracted you, and a portion of the American public, from noticing just who should be included in Romney’s despised “47 percent”. If there are bigger “takers” than Donald Trump, and I’m sure there are, they ain’t voting for Clinton, and I’m of the notion that THEY are far more “dangerous to liberty”.
Building a Light rail line the length of Nevada is the best thing this city could do for its long term future. Turning the old Dog Track into a transit hub is the next smartest thing they could do. For the people who bought expensive homes on Nevada expecting what has been the major road through downtown for the entire existence of this city to be a quiet neighborhood street have simply deluded themselves. Maintaining your bit of Mayberry is pretty self centered. Light rail of some type on Nevada is the only way to go, and modifying the median is the only way to make that happen. Nevada was designed at its current width in order to facilitate trolly cars. Trees and grass are nice and should be maintained where feasible, but bringing back this alternate form of transportation to the heart of Colorado Springs is simply the smartest thing we could do.
Tannim, you've marched your lack of concern for our country out one more time. After months of investigation and testimony the FBI determined there were no serious violations of national security. Keep on beating that dead horse. I told you what I thought of Gary Johnson after his "What's Aleppo" gaffe; now I've gotten to see two more interviews/town hall meetings and Johnson's coherency and questionable mentality stand out even more starkly. Was he stoned the last time he rambled through an interview? Are YOU stoned thinking that Johnson has a snowball's chance in hell of being elected?
My father was an 'original' member of the Air Force, converting from the Army Air Corps. He had a 4 digit serial number in the 'A' category. He was a lifelong member of the Air Defense Command, a fighter pilot, a WWII hero and WWII POW. He helped with the planning for the NORAD system, aided in the move from the Chidlaw Building to Cheyenne Mountain. When I was a PFC in the Army he took me on a tour of the Operations Center. I guarantee if he were alive today he would be furious at being on the end of Trump's comment about POWs...and so the real point is this - if you think splitting the vote will make you feel more comfortable just wait until the caca hits the fan if Trump is elected because of it.
You never replied to my first comment on your idiocy, but have since called me ignorant regarding Manitou Springs and TABOR, and you've called the City Council in Manitou Springs greedy. Fine. If the City Council there is greedy then why do things keep moving in that direction? Is it because the voters there may be re-electing greedy people, or is there an underlying economic reason requiring more revenue? I recently saw the 'roundabout' at a previously unmanageable intersection and though it to be well designed and a needed improvement. Maybe they just need the money and can't raise the revenue the normal way thanks to TABOR.
The truth is this - TABOR stinks. Cronyism is still alive in the political world with regard to development/developers, and TABOR couldn't reign that in. Colorado's infrastructure has gone to hell in a hand basket thanks to lack of revenue and spending continues to increase in other areas deemed 'more important' by lawmakers. Colorado's once great school system is unbalanced with regard to how it is funded and you keep on keeping' on the TABOR train.
Mr. Mckeown - the old north end, who are connected, are having cascade by CC brought down to one lane "for safety concerns".
You make an excellent point about there being a whole bunch of meetings to 'listen', community input committees padded with the Mayor minons and PR specialists who 'collect' ideas and concerns that do nothing other than claim the citizens were involved while the plans are laid, the concerns not addressed and we are told you had your chance because there were meetings.
I do like the idea of the Trolley down Nevada and into OCC and Manitou.
I applaud you for your foresight in not buying a home on a major corridor (Colorado Ave.), if the types of things you are griping about bother you. But why did you decide to buy a home on another major corridor (Nevada Ave.)? I think the Old North end is beautiful, and I like the nice raised medians. I also like the mixed use along Colorado Ave, as it benefits the side streets in the rest of the neighborhood, even if it makes the main corridor less picturesque. I'm not sure whether the city's plans for Nevada are the right thing to do or not, as there are advantages and disadvantages, but I am sure your letter is a NIMBY letter.
Love this man and I love his work. Congrats! Well done!
Richard McKeown: Of course the city staff sees no need for raised medians, because they have zero concept of General Palmer's vision or why they were installed in the first place. Six lanes on North Nevada through the North End is a stupid idea, undoubtedly. Best to leave it as is, but Suthers is too stupid to understand that sometimes the best thing to do is nothing.
Carl Silverman: You can have your fruits and nuts. I'll gladly make up for your vegetarianism with a medium-well steak smothered in mushrooms and onions.
Susan Tomblin: Ask yourself: Do you want the nuclear codes stored on an unclassified email server in a closet somewhere, just for the convenience of a career felon? Yes, Trump is bad, but Hillary is just as bad. That's why SANE people vote for Gary Johnson.
Len Bentley: Your definition of Ineptocracy is correct. So is your diagnosis of the real problem. The solution is Gary Johnson and the Libertarians, now playing at an election booth near you.
Steve Snyder: What is behind the anti-69 movement is simple common sense. We can't afford it, delegating medical decisions to an unaccountable board in Denver is simply a bad idea, worse than ACA, and 69 as simply giving oneself cancer to cure hypochondria. As for 70, the minimum wage is only a good idea if you like to see taxes and prices and unemployment go up and the valuation of skills and experience go down.
Gina Douglas: The only candidate who apologizes is Gary Johnson. That makes him the best candidate.
Sorry, HazyHurts, but I'm choosing Gary Johnson, along with the voters in this country who, unlike yourself, have a brain and haven't overdosed on the Stockholm Syndrome Kool-Aid (comes in red and blue colors).
The rest of your rant is your usual recycled nonsense that you've been spewing for two decades.
Good article by John, but in highlighting a lack of diversity, he did fail to mention that, if elected, I would bring a voice for an underrepresented Latino community and others to the region. I have demonstrated that I will be a voice for all, and that is why in addition to broad Republican support, the 2 Democrat city council members that John mentions in his article have both endorsed me over their own party's candidate for district 4. Longinos Gonzalez
To a great full spectrum local newspaper I've seen, through much of Matt's past work, his eye for capturing a scene with a camera, his excellent story recognition and article writing ability and the editors brilliance to bring it all together to insure, I feel, the continued growth of our community's own Independent information hub. Congratulations to all involved.
Little Trump!!!! Hit the nail on the head. You should hear his kid talk about being a self-made man while working for his daddy. Same out of touch buffoons as the Trumps.
Thank you, Susan Tomblin. You got right to the point.
I no longer live in Colorado Springs, but used to live on N. Nevada and I still care about the city deeply.
If I'm reading the LTTE from Mr. McKeown correctly, the city is considering ripping out the median and installing 2 more lanes for traffic, one of which might at some point be for light rail?
Speaking as someone who works in the urbanism field, this is a CRAZY idea. Bonkers. I'm not talking about adding light rail, I think that would provide a high ROI if it connected UCCS to downtown. If done right, it would significantly increase property values along the route and be more attractive to those who don't want to own an automobile or use it for every trip. Provided land use intensified around the rail, especially on the far north end of Nevada, the city would see a solid bump in tax revenue. I differ w/ Mr. McKeown on turing lower floors into offices, or adding apartments or "granny flats" in the rear of now single family homes. Apartments, businesses to serve new people, and more density are not bad things. Done the right way, this is the traditional, organic way a city grows. Land around big community investments should be able to support those investments in the form of higher tax receipts. It's a win-win for property owners and the community alike.
A much better solution to adding rail along Nevada would be repurposing one lane on each side for the rail. N. Nevada has 4 lanes of auto only traffic. It does not need 4. There's no way traffic volume is high enough for that (perhaps there are some delays at "rush hours" but does it make sense to design an entire system around a few peak hours?) Even if it was, traffic is not a zero-sum game. It expands or contracts more like a gas than a liquid or solid (see: Induced Demand.) If you build more lanes for automobiles, you get more automobiles. If you repurpose lanes, the traffic disperses into the grid or goes away, or people choose times other than the peak to travel. Demolishing that median for rail would be providing the "carrot" of quality mass transit w/o the "stick" of discouraging car use. Keeping Nevada in it's current configuration & repurposing a lane for rail would also be substantially cheaper than demolishing the median and adding rail b/c the city would have one less lane for automobiles to maintain. Asphalt IS EXPENSIVE!
That median is a HUGE amenity to the surrounding neighborhoods. It softens the streetscape. slows automobiles (and quiets traffic noise), takes in pollution, provides shade for people and habitat for animals, and is visually pleasant.
Ripping out that median is anti-city. It's prioritizing the swift movement of automobiles over everything else. One lane of auto traffic each way is plenty. Taking the median out will have cascading effects. The city will not see a return on the investment of rail. It will devalue surrounding land values leading to lower tax receipts. It will lose valuable green space. It'll be on the hook for not only the maintenance costs of 4 lanes of auto traffic, but also the costs to run a now less valuable rail line. It will make Nevada a louder, less pleasant, uglier place to be.
Cities around the world are at a crossroad. They can continue on an auto-centric approach to planning (a world-wide EXPERIMENT of unprecedented scale), one that goes against millennia of accumulated knowledge on how to build cities, one that devalues the land around it at the same time is costs us dearly to build and maintain, or we can return to the values that make cities work for people first, using infrastructure that's already in place instead of building more that we can afford to maintain.
The cities that return to a people first approach will win the 21st century. The core of Colorado Springs is well-positioned to do so, with it's connected grid, walkable/bikeable streets, pleasant architecture, and parks/amenities. Ripping out the median on Nevada would be moving in the wrong direction and would lead to stagnation or worse for the surrounding neighborhoods.
The town already has a daily newspaper that 'edits' comments by dictating which story readers will be allowed to comment on. Not to be confused with 'censorship', of course.
Do you guys edit any submissions? O wad Judd wondrinn.
All content © Copyright 2016, The Colorado Springs Independent
Website powered by Foundation