Longinos Gonzalez is the much better candidate in Commissioner District 4 race. He is an AF veteran, teacher, and also a successful small businessman. He would bring much needed diversity to local leadership that we keep asking for, has been involved locally and spoken on behalf of poor neighborhoods, at-risk kids, and on veterans issues. And he is a political outsider, having pulled off a surprise, upset victory in his primary.
The homeless people take advantage of us taxpayers. All these panhandlers asking for money they need to get a job find a place and get off the streets I've seen it first-hand homeless man can get a job and get off the streets. That's what's wrong with our country now everybody wants to give stuff to poor people or people that didn't work for it. Why do these people think they're entitled if they didn't earn it or work for it. And no we don't need millennials AKA young people on City Council. This city would go hell in a handbag
A64 in CO removed NO CRIMINAL penalties for cannabis from our books and has actually ADDED 2 new class one felonies and some 1,200 PLUS PAGES of NEW POT PROHIBITIONS. Pot cops have a bigger budget (50-80 million) than alcohol enforcers (1.2 million) and the budget for all violent criminals.
All A64 did was change WHO you get your cannabis from--instead of your friend or neighbor finding you pesticide free buds and having a little in their pocket to pay for their pot or their housing, the state licensed monopoly sells you pesticide ridden weed and taxes you 25-45% dependent on where you purchase and the 1%er's profit/control. Your ID and your purchases are recorded and stored in the CBI CRIMINAL database, accessible to the feds and all NSA computers. ALL are STILL in harms way of loss of employment, occupational licenses, child custody, gun rights, housing, banking, ALL assets, insurance, ALL government aid, student loans, organ transplants, and FREEDOM from incarceration. Oh and now you are also in harms way of pesticide on the tree of life....
The same people who brought you 1937 prohibition, Big Business, Big Government and Mass Media, have merely RE-BRANDED reefer madness in 2012-2016 as 'legalization', 'legalization like alcohol', and 'adult use'.....And they WIN the WAR on we the people when people who only read headlines vote yes on this BS. 'Legalization' 2012-2016 is NOT based on science, sanity or compassion any more so than 1937 reefer madness.
A poorly written, over simplification of a complex problem, racism, ageism and name calling. Well done.
Longinos Gonzalez is the much better candidate in commissioner district 4. He brings much needed diversity to local leadership and has been an advocate for poor neighborhoods, at-risk youth, and veterans issues. He is also a political outsider who won a surprise, upset victory in his primary.
Fortunately, voters win elections, not special interest groups. I won my council seat four years ago without their endorsement, and I will do everything I can to win again next April.
what do you expect... this backwards village is the old fart mecca of the mountains. young people don't want to stay here in teabaggerville and no young person worth a piss is going to work for $6250. since we are in teabaggerville it will be impossible to raise the salary. you know better than think these teabaggers want that $12 minimum raise to pass either. the downward spiral continues...
Sadly you seem to be right John. what's it going to take to fix this situation?
"we re gunna build a wall, and make Canada pay for it!"
I spoke with Electra, great lady, recently. All across the west side and Manitou her signs are being stolen. Sad and small behavior but not unexpected from the vote suppressing, gerimandering crowd in which we live. Go get em Electra!
Thanks Helen and Joel. I was unsure how to vote on this. The pro-side ads say a yes vote will limit out-of-state special interests, but I was skeptical since all the career politicians - aka the enemy of the people - are all on the pro-side.
And...for anyone who likes Amendment 64...know it would never have gotten on the ballot under the new rules of A71. Also know that under A71, it will be easy to repeal. NO on A71.
I wholeheartedly agree with Helen Collins on A71. She is absolutely correct in her assessment that it is removing the possibility of a government by the governed.
You will also note the slight of hand that REPEAL of initiated changes (such as TABOR which is the ultimate target of Suthers and other special interests) does not require the requisite 55%. So A71 not only makes it harder for new citizen amendments to be passed, but also makes it easier to repeal ones that citizens already approved.
Rest assured that TABOR will be the first target for repeal by the special interests who depend on corporate welfare and would like no limit on taxes provided for such purposes. These are the same special interests pushing A71. NO on A71.
Liz Coelho: So you would prefer that people who are simply uninformed about the ballot just "vote anyway"? That's about 80% of the electorate, and it's the primary reason that we have the governmental and political mess that we have. The correct message is yes, people should vote, but they better be informed before the act. Most aren't.
Steve Schriener: You missed the obvious, which is that Wallace never called the statement true or his own, just that it was a statement. An informed candidate would have recognized the question as a response to a third-hand statement and addressed it as such, as you just did. But they didn't, which only illustrates their own economic ignorance. It never was Wallace's argument in the first place. Sometimes questions are asked to gauge responses and reactions and knowledge, and this was one of them. Heck, in 2008, McCain was asked about the Plunge Protection Team and had no clue about the answer, even though he was *in that group*.
Dan Costrell: You should be, because the Indy never bothered to talk to all of the candidates, including the opponents of the ones they endorsed.
Bill Durland: Good point on 71, although it's ancillary to the real issue. But your comment on 69 makes no sense: If our "health care system should not remain in the hands of insurance companies, practicing medicine without a license and controlling the responses to our medical needs, motivated by maximizing their dollars", then why should it be placed in the hands of government, also practicing medicine without a license and controlling the responses to our medical needs, motivated by spending our tax dollars? The common denominator is there: the decisions are out of our hands as are the cost controls. One extreme doesn't require a switch to the other extreme. Vote NO on 69, and get medical decisions back into the hands of doctors and patients, not the corporations, and definitely NOT the government.
How I contact glen capers ? I am a long lost dear friend of his ... thank you
William Nat - I read the link, with all of its comments. I have to consider the source. We can all cherry-pick from whatever we choose, but that doesn't mean it has any more credibility than the Disney Channel. You and your fear cannot stop good, honest human beings from choosing when and how to end their suffering. I have done the same for many of my animal companions and I would expect, as a human being, that the same options would be available to me and mine. If you disagree then take the Nancy Reagan approach when it cones your time - "Just say no". The same goes for gay marriage, by the way.
Write the word CHOICE in capital letters - your best block print - and then stand in front of a mirror. Face the paper toward you so it reads correctly; then take the paper and turn it upside down and toward the mirror. Tell me what you see, and what it makes you think.
This year, California woman Stephanie Packer was denied treatment because legal suicide was available!
Watch what happened to this woman's husband:
You think this is impossible?
As luck would have it Andrew both of this elections leading candidates are going to keep you gainfully employed for a long time to come. Hopefully, one day you will realize that being a bullet catcher for the military industrial complex is a pretty crappy way to make a living.
Andy's job includes firing on civilians. Hooray. The military is told to vote fortrump just like new life church...what a joke.
All content © Copyright 2016, The Colorado Springs Independent
Website powered by Foundation