Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: stories: Columns: Your Turn

Re: “A Mother's Day wish

Keith...would you call that the side of the downfall of history?

1 like, 11 dislikes
Posted by TejonTech on 05/20/2014 at 7:11 PM

Re: “A Mother's Day wish

GAY MARRIAGE NOW LEGAL IN ENTIRE NORTHEAST

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/20/p…

5 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by guruD on 05/20/2014 at 3:06 PM

Re: “A Mother's Day wish

Two more bite the dust! Now waiting on Colorado, OK & Utah to follow suit!

We're Getting Married in Oregon:
5/20/2014: A U.S. District Court judge ruled Monday that Oregon same-sex couples have the right to marry. So couples quickly decided to make it official.

Federal Judge rules that ban on Same-Sex Marriage is Unconstitutional:

5/20/2014: A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Pennsylvania's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional..

4 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by guruD on 05/20/2014 at 2:42 PM

Re: “A Mother's Day wish

Thanks, Nicole! It was my honor. Be well.

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Sarah Musick on 05/12/2014 at 11:17 AM

Re: “A Mother's Day wish

Thank you!!! There is no good reason to deny that we must keep evolving until an adult, regardless of gender, sexual orientation, monogamy or polyamory, race, or religion is free to marry any and all consenting adults. The limited same-gender freedom to marry is a great and historic step, but is NOT full marriage equality, because equality "just for some" is not equality. Let's stand up for EVERY ADULT'S right to marry the person(s) they love. Get on the right side of history!

9 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Keith Pullman on 05/08/2014 at 5:45 AM

Re: “A Mother's Day wish

Sarah you are such an inspiration! You came and talked the other day in my class and I have never been so touched and felt so connected before! So awesome to read this!

6 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Nicole Watson on 05/07/2014 at 11:46 PM

Re: “Wake up and smell the weed

...and the industry pushes forward like a steamroller. There are already companies that specialize in supporting the new industry like http://yourgreencontractor.com. They build green facilities in Colorado for growing it and dispensaries to sell it. The entire scenario looks to be an economic boost like the marijuana-specific tourism companies that are also sprouting up.

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Michael Cordova on 02/10/2014 at 11:38 AM

Re: “Wake up and smell the weed

Great article, Mark!

5 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Judith Posch on 02/07/2014 at 5:40 PM

Re: “Wake up and smell the weed

Bach is going to have a short run, along with the council members that stated that they would "support the will of the voters" in regards to marijuana. They have failed to uphold their pre election commitments and are now holding a ticket for the next bus out of office.

15 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Are you kidding me ? on 02/07/2014 at 10:14 AM

Re: “Wake up and smell the weed

Us... the voting majority, will certainly remember Bach's attitude toward cannabis and the community in general, there will be NO second term. City Council…you're next.

11 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Tom McClain on 02/07/2014 at 9:28 AM

Re: “Wake up and smell the weed

In a democracy, taxation is not "theft." Nevertheless, avoiding taxes while enjoying the benefits of society is hypocrisy.

12 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Mr. K-- on 02/06/2014 at 2:27 PM

Re: “Wake up and smell the weed

Overall, I'd say that's pretty good commentary, but I wouldn't begrudge anyone the opportunity to avoid having his income stolen from him by taxation, and I sense an odd attachment to this practice of theft.

Also, while supporting individual freedoms, I must note that A64 is a regulatory farce, and I'm not sure it's a good idea for your party to be advocating the related taxation and regulation. That sort of pandering to the state is why I no longer pay much attention to the LP.

3 likes, 10 dislikes
Posted by wtfk on 02/05/2014 at 3:19 PM

Re: “In our sights: Browns Canyon

Amen!!!

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by TejonTech on 12/31/2013 at 2:44 PM

Re: “How we remember JFK's assassination

I remember only one thing vividly since I was very young - and that was the funeral procession. Especially the riderless horse with the backward boots and the constant drum beat. I can still recall the exact sound of that drum beat to this day.

P.S. I also remember being upset that the usual Saturday morning cartoons were not on the TV due to continuous live coverage of all the Washington DC activities (remember there were only three TV channels at the time).

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by CSIndyReader on 11/21/2013 at 11:00 AM

Re: “How we remember JFK's assassination

John . F. Kennedy’s assassination happened 50 years ago and a majority of Americans do not believe The Warren Commission Report. After 50 years of denials, free the files.

“Sunny Day in Dallas” – Gerry Segal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRH7qTLzxvU

http://www.gerrysegal.com

0 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Gerry Segal on 11/20/2013 at 2:30 PM

Re: “We mortals should hate war

Who got paid for the Iraq war??? When political families (Bush & Chaney) make money off of war, their will be no end of war in sight!

2 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by gurudori on 11/12/2013 at 1:00 PM

Re: “A message from the middle

“Don’t read any more of these [constituents’ emails] than you absolutely have to.” is precisely what Morse stated on the Rachel Maddow show. Feel free to view the video yourself to see the quote and the reference to what he was talking about Bill Guman.

The author states that guns continue to get more deadly, but a .44 magnum today is not much different than a .44 magnum 100 years ago except for the smokeless powder. But that is not something that is changing continuously. And a .44 slug is a .44 slug.

What has changed is the moral fiber of society along with increasing gun control. In general, in the US, it has been shown that more lax gun laws and allowing more law abiding citizens to have guns decreases crime and gun violence. But let's not confuse people's emotional response with facts.

7 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Rob Harris on 09/24/2013 at 5:04 PM

Re: “A message from the middle

BTW, happyfew, the actual story, which is still wrong, was NOT that he was denied an AR-15 because of a background check as many like you incorrectly assert. The original story was that he was denied an AR-15 because he was from out of state. However, the state does not have such a law regarding AR-15s.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/s…

In fact, the NY Times finally corrected their misstatement saying "Correction: September 20, 2013
An article on Wednesday about the gunman in the Navy Yard shooting, using information from senior law enforcement officials, misstated a provision in Virginia state gun law. Out-of-state buyers must provide additional forms of identification to purchase a high-capacity AR-15 rifle; the laws do not prohibit the sales of all AR-15 rifles to all out-of-state residents."

Since the gunman had not only a driver's license, but also a US military issued CAC, he would have had more than enough ID.

Even Vanity Fair had to correct themselves: "Update, 3:00 p.m.: A lawyer for the firearms store in question tells Talking Points Memo that “Mr. Alexis did not attempt to buy an AR-15 from Sharpshooters Small Arms Range. He asked about purchasing a handgun (no brand specified) but he was told that he could not purchase a handgun except for delivery to his home state through another Federally-licensed firearm dealer. He then decided to purchase the Remington 870 express shotgun.”"

5 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Dave H on 09/20/2013 at 5:35 PM

Re: “A message from the middle

Correction:

"He attempted to buy an AR 15 but was denied due to a state law because he was checked." -- happyfew

Incorrect, happyfew. The background check for an AR-15 and for a pump shotgun are exactly the same. If he was denied for one, he would have been denied for the other. He passed the background check for the shotgun; therefore he could not have been denied for the AR-15.

6 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Dave H on 09/20/2013 at 5:19 PM

Re: “A message from the middle

"5) The background check for an AR-15 and for a shotgun is exactly the same"

WRONG!

He attempted to buy an AR 15 but was denied due to a state law because he was checked... A very good state law, almost inarguable after this lesson.

0 likes, 8 dislikes
Posted by happyfew on 09/20/2013 at 2:46 PM

All content © Copyright 2016, The Colorado Springs Independent   |   Website powered by Foundation