RegionName: Academy (North)
pheedogg - According to SCIENCE the life process begins at conception. Say a woman becomes pregnant is it rational for her to avoid having sex at 12 weeks for fear of becoming "re-pregnant"? Meaning that she'll have her first child and then, 12 weeks later, she'll have her second? No, of course not. Why? Because biologically (see -- there is that science argument again) it won't happen because the life process BEGINS at conception. You can argue this life doesn't deserve full rights until a certain point but to say it isn't a life is an arguement that doesn't hold any water.
Yes, Amendment 48 has a relgious belief to it as well but to discount the scientific argument is short-sited.
Your stance on abortion is NOT based on science nor religion. It is based purely on your opinion of when life starts. Your decision to bash the religious component is based on emotion rather than the facts it really makes you harder to put any weight behind what you have to say.
BTW, I was born with a genetic disorder and I do pretty well for myself. Thankfully I wasn't aborted.
I too have been there more than once and I am very impressed. I just returned from a 2-week trip to Morocco and can vouch for the babaganush. Everything has been very tasty and great service each time.
I do agree that the decor leaves a lot up to the imagination but the authentic music adds a lot.
I've seen the RiP play several times -- tonight should be a good show!
Thanks for a great article! As one of the founding members of SHiP I couldn't be happier with the improv scene in the Springs. If you haven't seen one of these groups perform you're really missing out. Come see the Funniest Show in Pants this weekend in Manitou -- we'd love to have you experience the funny.
Stick Horses in Pants
What in the world are you trying to communicate Aaron? How was Neo911 villified [sic]? I was commenting on Ron Paul's lack of understanding of world history and made no mention of Neo911.
Plus your second comment is unclear. What do you mean by "still believe in terrorism"? Do you mean that only Republicans (I'm assuming this is what you were inferring because you mentioned 'Fox News') believe that the world is still committing terrorist acts when they're not? Or are you saying that terrorism does exist and is carried out by brainwashed zombies like Muslim extremists and (as you inferred) Republicans? Either way how is that comment relevant to the discussion? Or were you just taking a round-about jab at Right thinkers and couldn't think of a more articulate way to express it?
Paul's solution to the problems abroad is to run away and ignore them. Ask Europe how that worked for the Rhineland. I never thought I'd be a one issue guy but Paul's international policy (or lack thereof) proved me wrong.
Didn't we vote in Ref. C to help the schools? It looks like both sides of the aisle in Denver (but particularly the Democratic side since they are in power) substituted Ref C money for the funds that were already earmarked for education. So Ref C only REPLACED the money that should have been there instead of ADDING to it. How about writing an article on that?
All content © Copyright 2017, The Colorado Springs Independent
Website powered by Foundation