Larry S 
Member since Jun 26, 2008


RegionName: Powers

Stats

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Letters

Bill, you are rude and not that bright. You attack me for not answering your questions, when you've ducked mine not once, but twice? You and the NRA are just a bunch of old blowhards, if you ask me. You may think yourself to be a "political expert" but I hope for Lamborn's sake he has smarter people than you promoting him. Here you have a voter who wants information, and you rudely tell me to stick it, basically. You're nothing but a bag of hot air.

Posted by Larry S on 07/22/2008 at 3:31 PM

Re: “Letters

I don't know why you cannot answer some simple questions, Bill. If you can't, and the NTA website won't, then I no longer care. I was leaning towards Crank anyway, but you clinched it with your little games, Bill. Congratulations.

Posted by Larry S on 07/22/2008 at 11:29 AM

Re: “Letters

OK, Bill, now that we have that misunderstanding nehind us, my questions remain. I would really like a reasonable answer, because I think a lot of people may have these same questions: If it is so important to elect the right kind of legislators, and if the NRA gives them grades based upon their defense of the Second Amendment, then why doesn't the NRA give us that information for free? Why should we have to pay for important information like that? And how can we tell if you or anybody else is telling us the truth about these candidates, if we cannot verify it ourselves?

Posted by Larry S on 07/21/2008 at 6:07 PM

Re: “Letters

Bill, the Bambi comment was about the WANNABES, not genuine hunters like you. Sorry for the confusion.

Posted by Larry S on 07/21/2008 at 11:22 AM

Re: “Letters

Bill, you keep talking in circles, but you have yet to answer my simple questions: If it is so important to elect the right kind of legislators, and if the NRA gives them grades based upon their defense of the Second Amendment, then why doesn't the NRA give us that information for free? Why should we have to pay for important information like that? And how can we tell if you or anybody else is telling us the truth about these candidates, if we cannot verify it ourselves? I have a hunch that Bill knows that Crank got a higher score than Lamborn, and he just doesn't want us to know that before next month's primary.

Posted by Larry S on 07/20/2008 at 5:47 PM

Re: “Letters

Sorry, but this word of mouth game played out anonymously just doesn't work for me. I'm not much of a joiner to begin with, but it doesn't sit well with me that any organization would try to squeeze bucks out of me to give me information they ought to want people to know for free. There's something underhanded about it all, like extortion. And how would we know that you're a 20 yr NRA advocate and not some wannabe that likes to take a semi-auto out to slaughter Bambi's family? The cloak of secrecy stuff sucks.

Posted by Larry S on 07/20/2008 at 12:23 PM

Re: “Letters

I still don't get it. If electing pro-NRA legislators is so important, why doesn't the NRA tell us who they are, Bill? I've heard that Lamborn isn't rated as highly as you say he is, and that Crank is really the better candidate. Honestly, Lamborn strikes me as a nerd that wouldn't know what to do with a firearm of any kind.

Posted by Larry S on 07/19/2008 at 7:54 PM

All Comments »

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.
 

All content © Copyright 2014, The Colorado Springs Independent   |   Website powered by Foundation