The auther would be better served reading the Freeh report. The conclusions do not seem to relate to a report that absolves Paterno of any wrong doing. First, the report shows that Paterno forced Sandusky into retiring prior to the first report of abuse in 1998. Additionally, Paterno argued against Sandusky being permitted to bring kids onto campus, but was overuled in Sandusky's retirement agreement. The report also shows that PSU did not influence the police investigation in 1998, which found no evidence of wrong doing. Finally, regarding the 2001 report, which Paterno related to his boss and the head of PSU police, the report shows that the AD, after speaking with Paterno, decided on his own to stick with a course of action that the AD recommended prior to speaking with Paterno. All these facts are contained in the Freeh report.
All content © Copyright 2017, The Colorado Springs Independent
Website powered by Foundation