This talk was excellent! Too bad it was sold out and many citizens (and city council members) missed it. Lucky for us, Wes and Phil will be back for another talk, Jan 31, 6:30 p.m. Penrose Main Library, Carnegie Room. You don't want to miss this!
Public Trust is now ZERO! This deal stinks. Write to email@example.com and tell them NO on this deal.
@John Bender I am not sure where you are getting your numbers, but the Neumann systems bill to data is over $200M, after an initial estimate of $80M. By contrast, Nixon's scrubbers are coming in at $92M total.
Perhaps Mr. Pico (I wonder where his ancestors are from?) does not understand US Immigration Policy. http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/just-fact…
His resolution is redundant and completely unnecessary. The rules are already in place.
All this resolution does is make Colorado Springs come across as a hateful, xenophobic city.
Fort Carson is picking up the slack for Colorado Springs Utilities.
firstname.lastname@example.org send an email to all Manitou city council.
Ask them to run the shuttle year-round. Easy solution.
Portfolio D is totally unacceptable because it has no time-line to decommission Drake. At all. In 2012, CO Springs Utilities spent over half a million dollars to hire an outside
consultant to study the Martin Drake Power Plant. The result: they were advised
to decommission Drake as quickly as possible, not only because of the health risks
to over 500,000 residents, but also because it is simply not cost-effective to run
an aging coal plant for decades more to come. Again, Incredibly, CSU decided that
they did not agree with this study, and simply dismissed it. WE NEED A PORTFOLIO THAT INCLUDES A REASONABLE TIME-LINE TO DECOMMISSION DRAKE!!!
This is awesome !!!!!!!!!!!
All Comments »
All content © Copyright 2016, The Colorado Springs Independent
Website powered by Foundation