<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Stranger than fiction
    
      by Roland Sweet</title>
      <link>http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/stranger-than-fiction/Content?oid=1692651</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/Rss.xml?oid=1692651&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Stranger than fiction
    
      by Roland Sweet</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Colorado Springs Independent. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Colorado Springs Independent readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Colorado Springs Independent.</copyright>
      <webMaster>becca@csindy.com (Colorado Springs Independent Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:01 -0600</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 06:15:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Stranger than fiction]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/stranger-than-fiction/Content?oid=1692651&show=comments#1693742]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/stranger-than-fiction/Content?oid=1692651&show=comments#1693742]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Hrafn]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[West is lying (which is pretty much par for the course for the Disco 'Tute): there are vanishingly few "scientists", no "findings" (just a bunch of long-discredited arguments) supporting his position, and no evidence of 'persecution' against it (just a bunch of self-created faux-martyrs).<br>
<br>
All it adds up to is a rather shop-worn conspiracy theory for explaining why, in spite of its demise having been predicted nearly continuously for the last 150 years, the Theory of Evolution continues to go from strength to strength.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/Profile?oid=1693741">Hrafn</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:21:42 -0600</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.csindy.com">Colorado Springs Independent</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Stranger than fiction]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/stranger-than-fiction/Content?oid=1692651&show=comments#1693535]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/stranger-than-fiction/Content?oid=1692651&show=comments#1693535]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[PaulBurnett]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[In the "Birds of a Feather" article, you should have mentioned that evolution is a scientific theory, while intelligent design creationism is not. According to a Federal judge's decision in 2005, "We have concluded that intelligent design is not science, and moreover that intelligent design cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents."
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/Profile?oid=1693534">PaulBurnett</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:40:15 -0600</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.csindy.com">Colorado Springs Independent</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



