<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: CannaBiz
    
      by Bryce Crawford</title>
      <link>http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/cannabiz/Content?oid=1908236</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/Rss.xml?oid=1908236&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: CannaBiz
    
      by Bryce Crawford</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Colorado Springs Independent. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Colorado Springs Independent readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Colorado Springs Independent.</copyright>
      <webMaster>becca@csindy.com (Colorado Springs Independent Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:00:01 -0600</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: CannaBiz]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/cannabiz/Content?oid=1908236&show=comments#1912034]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/cannabiz/Content?oid=1908236&show=comments#1912034]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[offscreen]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Just to correct something. It was not the Colorado Board of Medical Examiners, now known as the Colorado Medical Board, which tightened the regulations around a physician's ability to authorize marijuana.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/Profile?oid=1912033">offscreen</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:30:58 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.csindy.com">Colorado Springs Independent</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: CannaBiz]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/cannabiz/Content?oid=1908236&show=comments#1910242]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/cannabiz/Content?oid=1908236&show=comments#1910242]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Article 18 section 14]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Colorado Constitution Article 18 Section 14 says:<br>
<br>
part 3c<br>
<br>
"...The agency shall notify the applicant that his or her application for a registry identification card has been denied if the agency's review of such documentation discloses that:<br>
<br>
...the documentation fails to state that the patient has a debilitating medical condition specified in this section or by state health agency rule;"<br>
<br>
But most importantly:<br>
<br>
"or the physician does not have a license to practice medicine issued by the state of Colorado."<br>
<br>
These doctors in question have licenses to practice medicine in the state of CO. These doctors do qualify under the Colorado Constitution. <br>
<br>
Most doctors who participate in the insurance industry will not sign these recommendations, because the insurance industry will reject them.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/Profile?oid=1910241">Article 18 section 14</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:00:14 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.csindy.com">Colorado Springs Independent</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



