http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/this-is-happening/Content?oid=1974111 Comments On: This is happening by Stephanie Rogers en-us Copyright 2013 Colorado Springs Independent. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Colorado Springs Independent readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Colorado Springs Independent. becca@csindy.com (Colorado Springs Independent Webmaster) Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:01 -0600 Wed, 22 May 2013 12:30:00 -0600 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss

http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2011/01/nasa…

Jan 24, 2011
NASA GISS: We don’t need no stinking thermometers

Tom Nelson Blogspot

The GISS analysis assigns a temperature anomaly to many gridboxes that do not contain measurement data, specifically all gridboxes located within 1200 km of one or more stations that do have defined temperature anomalies.
The rationale for this aspect of the GISS analysis is based on the fact that temperature anomaly patterns tend to be large scale.
Posted by Scottar]]> Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:57:24 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent
Weather Stations are only one way that temperature data is collected and analyzed. Scientists have multiple ways in which to collect climate data, including: satelite measurements of lower and upper troposphere, weather balloons, borehole analysis, glacial ablation observations, sea-ice data, sea level, proxy reconstructions, as well as ocean temperature data.
Posted by Blevinsdd]]> Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:55:18 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent
1) “Then why is the climate changing on other planets? And why is CO2 RISING while global temps are FALLING?”
What other planets are you refering to?
Posted by Blevinsdd]]> Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:41:38 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent Posted by heretic]]> Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:24:59 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent Posted by chuck in st paul]]> Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:19:04 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent
#1 "This wholly inaccurate argument is a favorite of Glenn Beck and his ilk."

wholly inaccurate argument
wholly inaccurate argument
wholly inaccurate argument

Say it louder -- that may help.
Posted by thatsmyredbag]]> Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:14:48 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent
Unless you yourself have taken the time to analyze the temperature data (NCDC / GHCN) vs. taking the words of those behind the claimed Global Warming; then you have no grounds/qualifications to be perpetuating their claim. Why you ask?
Posted by NoMoreBo]]> Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:09:20 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent Posted by Tucci78]]> Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:55:13 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent
Just checkin'.
Posted by pouncer]]> Mon, 27 Dec 2010 04:46:06 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent Posted by Average Joe]]> Sun, 26 Dec 2010 23:20:47 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent
Unfortunately this information will fall on many deaf ears. Once someone becomes entrenched in a particular point of view, contrary facts often cause them to dig in more.
Posted by Been There]]> Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:57:47 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent
Your non linear progressive ensemble of an intellect is driving your ego to new heights, unexplainable by classical laws of nature. Be wary of a sudden crash as you are proven wrong over the next decade.

Global warming alarmists: study natural history to find that two ice ages, with glaciers covering most of Minnesota and Wisconsin interspersed with warming periods and glacial regression all with no more fossil fuel usage by humans than a few campfires.
Posted by sandlakeman]]> Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:45:59 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent Posted by RayGun]]> Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:44:00 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent There are no bona fide citations in your article. You talk about "facts" without citing any.
Posted by PETMAN]]> Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:00:12 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent
http://americasright.com/?p=6744
Posted by bradfregger]]> Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:50:22 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent Posted by Alec Rawls]]> Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:40:39 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent Denialists: Please read Thin Ice by Mark Bowen, Plows, Plagues, and Petroleum by William Ruddiman, The Weathermakers by Tim Flannery, and Merchants of Doubt by Naomi Oreskes. Please stop posting until you've gotten through these texts.
Posted by None]]> Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:21:32 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent Posted by Tin Hat]]> Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:37:51 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent Posted by elmer]]> Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:56:58 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent This does not negate the fact that certain sea temperatures seem to be slightly warmer = which is nothing to shy away from.
Posted by Jabberwolf]]> Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:05:18 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent
But as an Earth scientist, I can confirm that virtually everything that Stephanie has written is correct. (And contrary to your statement, Greenland ice is melting even faster than Antarctica's, with net losses ~280 cubic km/year--that's about 60 cubic miles-- and accelerating).
Posted by tony]]> Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:26:28 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent Posted by omnologos]]> Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:49:04 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent
Mr. Gore says that he is simply putting his money where his mouth is.

“Do you think there is something wrong with being active in business in this country?” Mr. Gore said. “I am proud of it.
Posted by elmer]]> Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:27:05 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent
So what your saying is a warming ocean causes more sea Ice?
Posted by elmer]]> Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:03:40 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent
"The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a
travesty that we can't." - Michael Mann
Posted by elmer]]> Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:50:05 -0700 Colorado Springs Independent