<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Court upholds state Legislature redistricting maps
    
      by Ralph Routon</title>
      <link>http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2011/12/12/court-upholds-state-legislature-redistricting-maps</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/Rss.xml?oid=2405971&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Court upholds state Legislature redistricting maps
    
      by Ralph Routon</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Colorado Springs Independent. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Colorado Springs Independent readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Colorado Springs Independent.</copyright>
      <webMaster>becca@csindy.com (Colorado Springs Independent Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:01 -0600</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Court upholds state Legislature redistricting maps]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2011/12/12/court-upholds-state-legislature-redistricting-maps/#2406011]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2011/12/12/court-upholds-state-legislature-redistricting-maps/#2406011]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Matt Arnold]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[The Colorado Supreme Court's decision is simply stunning.<br>
<br>
Given the constitutional deficiencies remaining in the Colorado Reapportionment Commission's re-submitted maps, the procedural travesty by which the maps were adopted, and the availability of a more constitutionally-consistent set of maps submitted as part of the 'Minority Report' appeal (which the majority commissioners had attempted to suppress), rejection of the commission's maps - particularly given the court's rejection of the commission's previous set - appeared to be the only outcome consistent with constitutional and statutory criteria.<br>
<a href="http://www.clearthebenchcolorado.org/2011/12/09/colorado-reapportionment-commission-minority-report-filed-as-challenge-to-legislative-district-maps-in-colorado-supreme-court/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.clearthebenchcolorado.org/2011/&hellip;</a><br>
<br>
It will be interesting to analyze the reasoning by which a majority on the Colorado Supreme Court reached the conclusion that these maps were constitutionally valid once the court issues its full written opinion....
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/Profile?oid=2406010">Matt Arnold</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:04:32 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.csindy.com">Colorado Springs Independent</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



