<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Sell Utilities? Not a good idea, city panel said
    
      by Pam Zubeck</title>
      <link>http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2012/10/04/sell-utilities-not-a-good-idea-city-panel-said</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/Rss.xml?oid=2569614&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Sell Utilities? Not a good idea, city panel said
    
      by Pam Zubeck</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Colorado Springs Independent. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Colorado Springs Independent readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Colorado Springs Independent.</copyright>
      <webMaster>becca@csindy.com (Colorado Springs Independent Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:01 -0600</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:45:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Sell Utilities? Not a good idea, city panel said]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2012/10/04/sell-utilities-not-a-good-idea-city-panel-said/#2570579]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2012/10/04/sell-utilities-not-a-good-idea-city-panel-said/#2570579]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[smartestman]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[La chap:  Steve Schuck has no more say in the sale than you. However, since we live in a Republic and Steve Bach was duly elected to represent us, he does have a say.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/Profile?oid=2389486">smartestman</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 10:38:55 -0600</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.csindy.com">Colorado Springs Independent</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Sell Utilities? Not a good idea, city panel said]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2012/10/04/sell-utilities-not-a-good-idea-city-panel-said/#2570573]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2012/10/04/sell-utilities-not-a-good-idea-city-panel-said/#2570573]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Dan LaChappelle]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[The Utilities or any part there of , is NOT Steve Bach or Steve Schuck's to sell , it belongs <br>
to the citizen owners  customers of Colorado Springs Utilities. Believe it or not we love and appricate our local 4 service utilities, rates are good and service is excellent.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/Profile?oid=2570571">Dan LaChappelle</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 10:13:48 -0600</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.csindy.com">Colorado Springs Independent</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Sell Utilities? Not a good idea, city panel said]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2012/10/04/sell-utilities-not-a-good-idea-city-panel-said/#2570559]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2012/10/04/sell-utilities-not-a-good-idea-city-panel-said/#2570559]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Concerned Citizen]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Thanks for digging into this issue, Pam! Great work!
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Concerned Citizen]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 08:30:26 -0600</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.csindy.com">Colorado Springs Independent</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Sell Utilities? Not a good idea, city panel said]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2012/10/04/sell-utilities-not-a-good-idea-city-panel-said/#2569920]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2012/10/04/sell-utilities-not-a-good-idea-city-panel-said/#2569920]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Mark H.]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Okay, so now we know for sure that economics and affordability is not part of the equation in the future vision of the community or the related decision making for Bach, Dougan, and many others involved. Good to know!
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Mark H.]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 21:32:55 -0600</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.csindy.com">Colorado Springs Independent</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Sell Utilities? Not a good idea, city panel said]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2012/10/04/sell-utilities-not-a-good-idea-city-panel-said/#2569906]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2012/10/04/sell-utilities-not-a-good-idea-city-panel-said/#2569906]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Stacy Moore]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Yeah, no shit.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/Profile?oid=2414041">Stacy Moore</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 20:45:46 -0600</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.csindy.com">Colorado Springs Independent</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



