<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: &lt;i&gt;USA Today&lt;/i&gt; outlines Colorado&apos;s sequestration situation
    
      by Kirk Woundy</title>
      <link>http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2013/02/20/usa-today-outlines-colorados-sequestration-situation</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/Rss.xml?oid=2629010&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: &lt;i&gt;USA Today&lt;/i&gt; outlines Colorado&apos;s sequestration situation
    
      by Kirk Woundy</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Colorado Springs Independent. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Colorado Springs Independent readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Colorado Springs Independent.</copyright>
      <webMaster>becca@csindy.com (Colorado Springs Independent Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:01 -0600</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:45:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: USA Today outlines Colorado's sequestration situation]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2013/02/20/usa-today-outlines-colorados-sequestration-situation/#2629423]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2013/02/20/usa-today-outlines-colorados-sequestration-situation/#2629423]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[TejonTech]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[The deal is congress and Obama decided we could all just suck it up and reduce our personal budgets by 2% to cover a tax increase.<br>
<br>
Then they are asked to reduce at the same level the government budget and can't do it. Can we ignore the tax increase the way they ignore their mandate to cut spending?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/Profile?oid=2448885">TejonTech</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:16:30 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.csindy.com">Colorado Springs Independent</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: USA Today outlines Colorado's sequestration situation]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2013/02/20/usa-today-outlines-colorados-sequestration-situation/#2629386]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2013/02/20/usa-today-outlines-colorados-sequestration-situation/#2629386]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[mike]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[certainly the potential loss of jobs is an issue to everyone in the area. at what point can this country continue to field a military of these numbers?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          mike]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:18:58 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.csindy.com">Colorado Springs Independent</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: USA Today outlines Colorado's sequestration situation]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2013/02/20/usa-today-outlines-colorados-sequestration-situation/#2629343]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2013/02/20/usa-today-outlines-colorados-sequestration-situation/#2629343]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[OldCrank]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[OOPS, looks like Bach's campaign to bring in 6000 more jobs a year is going in reverse, with the USAF set to furlough 6000 jobs here. <br>
<br>
But it's okay, he meant well.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.csindy.com/coloradosprings/Profile?oid=1375643">OldCrank</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:41:57 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.csindy.com">Colorado Springs Independent</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



