*V for Vendetta (R)
Carmike Stadium 10, Chapel Hills 15, Cinemark 16, Cinemark 16 IMAX, Tinseltown
Even in an era when the term "graphic novel" has given the comic book an air of legitimacy, you probably think you know what you're getting from a movie like V for Vendetta, which is based on an illustrated story. And you probably aren't expecting what may be the most politically subversive blockbuster ever created.
The film is set in a near-future England where unrest in this case, terrorists' biological attacks has led to the rise of a fascistic government. State police are free to do what they will, including assaulting poor young women like Evey Hammond (Natalie Portman) who make the mistake of being out after curfew.
But Evey finds an unlikely rescuer in V (Hugo Weaving), who wears the mask of long-ago British rebel Guy Fawkes. V has plans for bringing the government of the chancellor (John Hurt) to its knees, unless a local police detective (Stephen Rea) can find out V's identity first.
V for Vendetta was adapted by The Matrix's Wachowski brothers, and it's not hard to spot some fundamental connections between the works. Like The Matrix, V for Vendetta is essentially a story of political awakening. V plays Morpheus to Evey's Neo, offering a choice between oblivious security and rebellion against the machine.
But this version of the story doesn't mess around with allegory. This updated version takes square aim at policies in a "war on terror" world. And, like V, it's pointing its finger as much at the people who "gave in to fear" as at the leaders who took advantage of that fear. V for Vendetta attacks national retreats into piety and repression that find their justification in keeping the people safe including from themselves.
Yet, the film also makes the risky choice of making its protagonist more than a little nuts. V is a philosopher, to be sure, but as we learn from his origin, his goals are as much personal as they are political. This single-minded madness allows him to be a less romanticized freedom fighter and, by extension, it becomes easier to see the strange internal logic guiding every kind of terrorist action.
It's unfortunate that it's not as easy to see the internal logic of England's leaders. Hurt's nothing more than a Big Brother face on a television screen, and the film's other antagonists become easy stereotypes of hypocritical external conservatism. The government's "evil" becomes too easy a target when it's not balanced by its own rationalizations.
Still, there's something consistently invigorating about watching a film like this take so many chances. It's asking its audience largely young males to recognize the injustice of turning homosexuals into scapegoats. It plays with its own concept of reality, manufacturing a conspiracy theory, then undercutting it as possible nonsense, though easy to believe when the government lies in so many other ways.
Director James McTeigue a longtime Wachowskis collaborator making his feature directing debut maintains a pulse of energy even when the film is delivering speeches, which is something the Wachowskis themselves couldn't do in the last two Matrix films.
The result is something flawed but urgent, and in its way a louder rebel yell than anything concocted by Michael Moore because by speaking to the comic-book blockbuster crowd, it's not already speaking to the converted.
So proud of you Catherine!!! I knew you could do it!!!
I read an early draft of Ghostland in 2014 that was written by Jon Orr…