Corporations do the darnedest things.
In a recent Indy cover story on corporate electioneering ("Money talks," Jan. 12), we looked at American Tradition Partnership, a secretive Colorado group that quietly channels corporate money into conservative political coffers. "The only thing we plan on reporting is our success to contributors like you ... " ATP promises donors. "You can just sit back on election night and see what a difference you've made."
In many ways, political slush funds take the existing corporate model to its logical conclusion. By definition, traditional corporations are profit-driven entities, so much so that directors can be sued for making a decision based on anything other than maximizing profits.
But even as American Tradition Partnership prepares to go before the U.S. Supreme Court — in a case that might well impact the controversial Citizens United decision — a growing "benefit corporation" movement aims to give corporate personhood a makeover.
Back in December, New York became the seventh state to pass legislation allowing corporate directors to factor social and environmental concerns into the decision-making process. Similar legislation being introduced in the Colorado General Assembly could make this state next.
In an ideal world, benefit corporations would simply offer a less secretive, more socially benign way of doing business. This week's cover story, beginning here, considers how that may play out in real life.
Colorado Springs Democrats scrambling to find something negative, typical election tactics! We've already found neo-Nazi…
On the contrary to Dr. Rose's sentiment, UCCS not only can but should refuse the…
Well Ill give ya that one Robert and agree.