The comments made about Miss Piccone by ALC seem very malicious to me and extremely inacurate considering I contacted ALC a few months ago in desperate need of help with a legal mater, ALC would not even give me the time of day after hearing that I could not affford legal help. They talked in there comment about helping so many clients regardless of there abilities to pay,well from my prospective this seems quite confusing considering there brief conversation with me, but then I had the great fortune of meeting Miss Piccone, who I might add is my attorney in my situation. Miss Piccone not only gave me her undivided attention when I contacted her but also out of the kindness of her heart and with great compassion accepted my case saying "Do not worry about the money". Miss piccone does not talk about helping people she just does it.....
Representing a person guilty of abandoning his dog on a mountain sullies your reputation than anything anyone could have said on or off the record.
Ms. Piccone has done remarkable work for all animals, not for the humans that abuse them.
Sorry. I thought the first letter didn't post. (first time posting on Facebook)!
My name is Pamella Kent. My daughter was murdered at her boyfriend's apartment. There has not yet been an indictment in the case but the boyfriend is a suspect. When my daughter died the boyfriend took her dog, Carmella to his mother's house. The dog is not nor was she ever his dog. As legal representative of my daughters estate Carmella should be with me. She may even have been in danger if left with him.
Even though I sought several times to retrieve Carmella with the help of the Arapahoe County Sheriffs Office I was told that this was a property issue and was for the court to decide. The boyfriend was claiming Carmella belonged to him.
Seeking help I was referred by a victims rights advocacy to The Animal Law Center where I spoke with Jay Swearingen. He Charged me a stiff fee for writing an ineffective letter to the boyfriends attorney. He then said he would take my case but that it would be very expensive. More than I could afford. So I went to another victims advocacy who referred me to The Piccone Law Firm.
Juliette Piccone immediately grasped the situation and took my case on a pro-bono basis. Though I have tried to pay her what I could for her services she has never asked for a penny.
Because of Juliette's legal expertise through this lengthy and complicated situation I now have Carmella with me. She has represented me at 4 court appearances, filed many motions and spent many hours of expert legal maneuvering.
The battle is not yet over. The boyfriend still wants the dog. We still have another hearing in the case. But judging by her legal abilities to this point I have every confidence in Juliette. I expect the best possible outcome with her at my side.
My name is Pamela Kent. My daughter was murdered in her boyfriend's home. He has not yet been indicted but he had taken possession of her dog Carmella, and claimed her as his own. As legal representative of my daughter's estate Carmella should have gone to me. After seeking several times to have the Arapahoe County Sheriff get Carmalla back I was informed that this was a matter for the court to decide. So I sought help from a victims advocate who referred me to The Animal Law Center. I then went to their office and spoke with Jay Swearingen. He wrote an Ineffectual letter to the boyfriend's attorney for which he charged what I considered very high for the actual work he did. He said he would represent me in this case but that it would be very expensive. So I contacted another victims advocacy, Rocky Mountain Victims Law Clinic, who referred me to The Piccone Law Firm. Juliette Piccone Immediately saw that Carmella should be mine and that she may even have been in danger if left with the boyfriend. She took the case on a pro-bono agreement even though it has been a complicated and lengthy affair. I have given her what I could afford for her her legal expertise but she never asked for a penny. Through her considerable efforts (4 court hearings, Many motions to the court and many, many hours of legal maneuvering), I have Carmella back where she belongs. There is no one I would rather have at my side during such an emotionally stressed-filled legal situation, trying to protect an innocent little puppy from injustice and a possibly very dangerous situation. Juliette has done every possible thing she could to insure Carmella has a safe place to live, with her rightful owner. The legal battle is not over. The boyfriend stills claims Carmella, and we have another court hearing coming up soon. But I have complete confidence in Juliette's ability as an animal rights attorney and in her compassion for me in these trying times. With her help I know I can expect the best possible outcome for this dog and I.
OUCH someone hit a nerve.....Facts would clear this up and financials usually work but wouldn't that take time away from the important issue "the animals"?? How rude to call someone by their last name and no title.. I am sure Ms Piccone has earned the respect of being addressed like a human and not an object. I am reading between the lines on this one. Talk about pathetic this is a no brainer.,
Wasn't it ALC that represented the man that left his dog on a mountain to die for 8 days and got him what amounted to a slap on the wrist for such actions? I do not see where that is serving the animals at all. If not for the 7 or 8 that went up that mountain and backpacked that dog down, at which time ALC's client wanted said dog back,(luckily he did not get the dog back) the animal would have in fact died but you saw fit to represent a GUILTY man. How does that work?
Jennifer, my comment about my time at The Animal Law Center was meant to be "off the record." And the pit bull cases were contingency with statutory attorney fees if the parties prevailed, not pro bono. I didn't mean to start a war of words with you. God knows we will always have our differences. Juliet Piccone, founder of The Piccone Law Firm, Colorado Animal Attorneys and Animal Attorneys of the Rocky Mountains (non-profit).
We at The Animal Law Center want to clear up a comment in this article made by a disgruntled former volunteer/employee Juliet Piccone. Her statement, that “everything is about the money” at The Animal Law Center, grossly misrepresents what we do and how we operate.
More than 95% of our cases are pro-bono or low-bono, because we operate on a shoe-string budget and strive to serve the public. Each of our highly accredited professional staff members receives far less compensation than our colleagues in the legal field. We make this sacrifice to sustain the firm and to serve the public interest of Colorado, as well as the national animal community. What little revenue is generated is either invested back into the firm or issued as minimal payment for work. Piccone was a beneficiary of some of that minimal compensation. I donate countless hours to legal cases and related causes and have spent the greater part of a personal inheritance to create and build this practice.
One example of the pro or low bono cases we’ve done is a pit bull service dog case out of Denver and Aurora. That recently settled case alone entailed thousands of attorney hours spanning five years. We also represent countless rescues, shelters, and non-profit organizations for little or no money. In fact, we don’t take a normal hourly rate for many of our cases.
Piccone’s indefensible comments constitute a pathetic effort to sully the work we do and they are offensive. It should be understood by all that The Animal Law Center is about animals first – not profits.
Jennifer Edwards, lawyer and founder of The Animal Law Center
Due to comments violating our policies against personal attacks and name-calling, we have disabled the commenting function on this and related stories. Those wishing to have comments published re: this story in our Letters to the Editor section are welcome to submit them to email@example.com.
This is the same budget structure that was voted on for both 2012 and 2013. In both years the budget was passed without structural issues, maintaing the 5 department format.
Regarding stormwater, Mayor Bach has proposed a new regional authority to manage stormwater.
You can read more about it here: http://mayorstevebach.com/mayor-bachs-storm-water-proposal/
Meet the Man Who Brought Marriage Equality to Minnesota
"In the past we spent a lot of time talking about rights and benefits and discrimination, and protecting the constitution," explains Carlbom. "And in Minnesota, what we discovered is that Minnesota’s definition of marriage is love and commitment, which when people follow love, the next natural step is to make a commitment toward one another to get married. And in Minnesota, we discovered that when we had an honest conversation, and when we had a natural conversation with each other, very quickly, both came to realize that same-sex couples want to get married for very similar reasons as straight couples. That’s because it’s all about love."
But that wasn't the end of the conversation, Carlbom explains. Using research culled from national and local partners, the MN United coalition had a very specific plan: Once they had established a common definition about the meaning of marriage, Carlbom and his allies relied on an age-old adage to illustrate why voters should oppose the amendment: the golden rule.
"When you say, ‘if marriage is about love and commitment, and that human beings believe in treating others the way you want to be treated, would you ever want to be told it’s illegal to marry the person you love?’" asks Carlbom rhetorically. "And very quickly, people come to the realization, they go on a journey — that, no, they wouldn’t want to be treated differently than they treat other people."
How about having an old-style town hall debate between Bernie Herpin and John Morse,
this way the constituents of Senate District 11 can ask questions that they want answered. I would think we could come up with someone to be the moderator and a place to hold it. Maybe the league of women voters or some other neutral party.
It was so nice this year that they were all way over in the America Beautiful Park in their cute little outfits and not right up our noses downtown.
Out of sight and out of mind made for a nice weekend for the rest of us too. Glad their event was as successful for them as a quiet downtown was for us.
We all won this way...like keeping your sexual issues to yourself always did before.
"As with tobacco in the mid-20th century, it may take a while for one side to "win" in the arena of public opinion."
But by then, the deed will have been done and we might find that they've permanently contaminated ground water over huge areas. When there's this much money involved, I trust no one, especially not the oil and natural gas industry.
I could see myself as the Queen of England too, but that wouldn't make me that!
K: You know I would never be judgmental, but just look at the guy. You can tell he is a loser before he ever opens his mouth. And, once he begins to speak, he leaves absolutely zero doubt.
siggie, for once you an I are in complete, unreserved agreement.
What I find most amusing is the nimrod's desperate need to convince us that he actually has a life. His life is so full! But he still manages to find the time in his busy schedule to spend 24x7 doing nothing but monitoring this blog for every mention of his name.
This guy is an obvious nimrod.
I am truly interested in how this will evolve, I am hoping bridges and gravel containment can be done with the whole community.
All content © Copyright 2016, The Colorado Springs Independent
Website powered by Foundation