Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range
    • From:


Comment Archives: stories: News

Re: “Mixed blessings

My name is Victoria I'm a single mother of 4. My now X has left us to basically figure it out alone in a state we know no one, We are from Texas. I luv it here and would luv to raise my kids somewhere decent. I have been directed to a shelter or two but for what ever reason they are located in a area where is not safe. I'm a country girl. I am just surprised how from one side of the street its beautiful and the next is filled with sadness. Granted some people choose that life but as for me and my lids we would like somewhere a litte more secured. know of any please contact me at

Posted by Victoria Marie Sanchez on 10/19/2014 at 10:56 PM

Re: “Proposition 105: GMOs

Organic vs Autism correlation…

Posted by Steven Alexander Shaver on 10/19/2014 at 8:41 PM

Re: “Proposition 105: GMOs

Roundup's LD50 is less than caffeine. (Also an organic pesticide) The dose makes the poison. It tastes like soap.

Some good information on application. You use about 7 oz per acre:…

"For soybeans, the application rate is 0.75 lb active ingredient / acre. I can't work in lbs, mostly because I can't figure out why we don't spell "pounds" as "lounbs".

Speaking metrically, that's 340 g of active ingredient per acre. That's about the amount of weight/volume in a 12oz (why don't we spell it "ounze" can of soda (or beer; doesn't matter). That number assumes that glyphosate is about the density of water, which it's not. It is 1.70 g cubic cm, so that 12 oz can is really about 7 oz big."


Correlation =/= causation. We've become better at diagnosing problems. The "Growing number of cases" isn't really growing. I mean the growth of organic food sales correlates to the amount of diagnosed cases of autism.…
Here's also a number of different spurious correlations.

Here's some solid critiques on the Seralini study some blogs but still solid critique:…

The EFSA's review:………

Interesting that you're going to discount 100 billion animals and a trillion meals for 10 rodents per group... where even the controls got tumors.
Also the 04 Hammond study used 400 rodents which used 50 per group


Here's GENERA's 402 independent studies all showing safety:

Amazing how oil companies, who make much more money than any biotech company, who have amazingly counter opinions on Climate Change compared to the the scientific community. Can't force evidence toward their agenda. But, somehow a company the size of Whole Foods have every scientist bought and paid for.

Posted by Steven Alexander Shaver on 10/19/2014 at 8:15 PM

Re: “Proposition 105: GMOs

When will those of you wishing for less use of RR seeds be able to "walk and physically pull' weeds during the summer months? Yeah, thought so... You talk a good game, but very few of you will do what it takes to rid fields of weeds.

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by None of the Above on 10/19/2014 at 3:00 PM

Re: “Proposition 105: GMOs

Putting an additional label on a food product will do little in the way of making the said food affordable. Does anyone really believe that the 90 million unemployed workers in the US are going to spend any income they have on "certified organic" food?

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by None of the Above on 10/19/2014 at 2:56 PM

Re: “Mixed blessings

Before I make my post, please let me allow me to describe a bit about myself.

I used to hate my own family members: my dad, my mom, even my handicapped brother and little sisters. I was also homosexual and sexually immoral with women, sleeping with every beautiful women I could get my greedy hands on. I was so bad with sex, that I literally could not go to sleep at night unless I had sexual intercourse with a woman, even if that woman was a complete stranger.

Now, just like a lot of people who end up in the kind of lifestyle I was in, I did not plan on growing up to be such a bad person that I would hate my own family and be a sex addict, sleeping with people I had just met on a regular basis, and turning to prostitutes each night just so I could get high enough on sex to be able to fall asleep. Most of all, I never imagined as a child that I would grow up to be someone that was so evil, that when I looked in the mirror, I was ashamed to look at myself, and I hated myself. I never imagined that I would hope on a regular basis that somehow I could muster enough courage to go through with committing suicide or that God would just kill me in my sleep so I could escape my life.

But unfortunately, like most people who end up in evil lifestyles, I was taught to hate as a young child by my father and by others in my life. I know now that he truly did not mean to teach me that, but because of his not being able to understand in his heart that Jesus loves him, he hated himself, and he transferred that hate to me. He choked me until I was unconscious when I was 7 years old. I watched him beat my mother. He destroyed a tv with a hammer as my mom, my little siblings, and I were watching it, and afterward, as he stared at us with violent rage in his eyes, I truly feared that he was about to start beating me and all of us to death with the hammer. Like most people who don't have a dad who loves them, I got in with the wrong group of guys in high school... basically a "gang" mentality. The abuse and hatred I suffered at the hands of those boys was horrible. I became to believe that I was worthless. I began to hate everyone, just as I had been hated on by so many people.

One day, Andrew Wommack was teaching on t.v. that the Bible was written by former men like Moses, the apostle Paul, King David, etc.... so "how could anyone think that God couldn't love them and use them, if God loved these murderers and even used them to write much of the Bible." He began to talk about how the Good News of the Gospel in the Bible is that God loves us unconditionally, no matter how bad a person we have been, even if we have been a murderer, and that the Bible being full of stories of God forgiving and using murderers proves that fact. He said something like, "how anyone could believe that they have to perform and do right for God to love them is beyond me, seeing how He has shown such love to such bad people."

After Andrew said that, something began changing in my heart. I began to realize that there was hope for me, despite the fact that I was such a horrible person that I would murder my own family members in my heart with my hatred. Before this time, I figured I would just die and go to hell someday, and never have a happy life...that I was just the most unlucky person on earth to have been brought into this world, lived the most horrible life, and then just have to die and go to hell because I knew I was not a good person. I knew that no matter how hard I tried to be good now, it could never erase my past and the things I had done, or the hate and violence that was in my heart. But now, after listening to this message by Andrew on t.v. that the Bible taught that God's love for me us unconditional, I began to seriously desire a relationship with Jesus, who Andrew said loved me unconditionally and would completely forgive me based on His grace, not based on my good works or performance. This was a breath of fresh air to me, and honestly gave me motivation to keep living instead of giving in to suicidal thoughts and just going ahead and ending my life. It gave me hope, which I am forever grateful to God for Andrew helping me to have. I remember also Andrew's testimony of how he first came to understand the grace of God...that God gave him a realization of how evil he personally was, but that God loved him unconditionally anyways and had forgiven him through Jesus and His sacrifice on the cross.

Since that time, God has done a similar work in my life to what God had done for Andrew... I saw how evil I was in the sight of my heavenly Father who loved me... It was not that God made me feel bad about myself, it was that He showed me that He is my loving Father, I could feel His love for me personally, despite the horrible person I was, all over me in the depths of my heart, and that holy love revealed to me in a very personal way how much of a sinner I was, and the horrible evil that was inside of me, that I would hate my own parents and family. I saw that it was only God's unconditional love and grace that He would love me, and because of such powerful love, I repented of my hatred and asked Him to forgive me, gratefully confessing what I sinner I truly was, because I was so grateful to let His love and grace come into my heart and wash me and forgive me of my hatred and sin.

I truly thought that there was no hope for me after I once again sinned with sex outside of marriage just a few days after the experience I just mentioned, and woke up the next day feeling more hopeless than I had ever felt. It was then that Jesus Christ came to me personally by the power of His Spirit and told me that He forgave me of what I had done, and not only that, but that He forgave me for all of the sexual sin I had ever done. He told me to fast and pray, which I am now doing, because I love Him and want to do whatever He tells me to do. Not only that, but another time in my life, about a year before all of this happened, a couple of nights after I had performed homosexual acts, Jesus came to me by the power of His Spirit (which is a Godly presence that feels like pure love) and reached His hand inside of me and healed me of homosexuality. Since that day, I have not been a homosexual! And I am so thankful for that! Also that day, He healed me of some of the worst pain of my life, which was losing my only friend, my best friend in the world, my brother Dylan, to mental illness when I was 14. And the truth is, at that time when Jesus healed me of homosexuality, I still hated God. I still hated my family, even my brother, and I still hated Jesus. Yet He did all of this for me.

So, now that you know who I am, I will make my comment on this article to the point:

Is Andrew Wommack perfect? No. But neither are YOU! No one is, except God. Do I feel that he may be a bit judgmental towards gays or other types of sinners at time? Yes. But, as a former gay, I would have rather had a man showing that he cared enough about me to tell me that what I was doing was wrong, and to try and help me (even if he wasn't helping that much because he wasn't loving enough and a bit judgmental), than to just let me keep destroying my life and not doing anything at all to try and help or speak up about it. It is the thought that counts, even if the person is not perfect in their helping.

Jesus said in the Bible in Mark 9:39-40 (KJ3 literal translation): "...there is no one who shall do a work of power in My name, yet be able to speak evil of Me quickly. For who is not against us is for us."

Andrew did a work of power in the name of Jesus when he spoke the word of God to me and gave me hope to keep living and not kill myself. To me, to give someone hope who is hopeless, and to help them believe that God can love them, is a greater work of power than raising someone from the dead. So according to Jesus, Andrew is for Him, even though Andrew is not perfect.

I think everyone on here coming against Andrew should be ashamed of what they are doing, because they are coming against someone who is for Jesus, and that means they are coming against Jesus.

Sometimes shame is a good thing, because it shows us that what we are doing is wrong, and we need a good change in our lives for the better. If I had never felt shame over being a homosexual, my sexual immorality, or hating my own family members, I think I would have been too prideful to let Jesus heal me of those horrible things that were destroying me from the inside out.

I hate that shame is always associated as a bad thing in or modern society... feeling Godly shame can help you to get your life turned around for the better!

Posted by jmet on 10/19/2014 at 11:52 AM

Re: “Proposition 105: GMOs

Curious wrote: "GE proponents.... want an ignorant and compliant public..."
True. George Carlin told us about this years ago, here are his prophetic words:… (NOTE: F Bomb alert)

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by OldCrank on 10/19/2014 at 11:01 AM

Re: “Proposition 105: GMOs

@Steven Shaver, not one of those 1700 prove GMOs are safe for human consumption. The fact that you cite the trillion meal study as any kind of evidence of safety at all tells me you have fallen for the GMO biotech company lies or you are deliberately trying to mislead people. Ninety five percent of the animals in that study were from 49 day old broiler chickens! Super short term studies prove nothing when it comes to safety. The remaining five percent were mostly cattle that were also killed way before their life expectancy. In other words those studies are worthless and they have already been debunked. By the way, if you think Round Up is so safe I'm sure you would be willing to drink it, but many of us want GMOs labeled so we can avoid it.

3 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Debbie Owen on 10/18/2014 at 3:08 PM

Re: “Proposition 105: GMOs

@Steven Shaver. Glyphosate kills our GOOD GUT BACTERIA! Google "GMO + Glyphosate + Dr. Stephanie Seneff." That's why we have an explosion of health issues with our digestive system.

5 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Caroline Yunker on 10/18/2014 at 9:47 AM

Re: “Proposition 105: GMOs

@Steven Shaver The Seralini Study used the SAME type of rats that Monsanto used. Furthermore, Seralini used twice the # of rats and their studies was for 2 years. Monsanto's study last anywhere from 30-90 days. Obviously you did not read the Seralini Study. The test was conducted using many different combinations of glyphosate and corn. Stop buying the lies perpetuated by Monsanto.

5 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Caroline Yunker on 10/18/2014 at 9:40 AM

Re: “Proposition 105: GMOs

Here is the other side of the GMO story, from the recent "Seeds of Doubt" conference in Broomfield, Colorado (on October 11th). I would encourage everyone to watch these films.

1 like, 2 dislikes
Posted by Sandra Knauf on 10/18/2014 at 9:09 AM

Re: “Proposition 105: GMOs

Vote YES on labeling--64 countries have this, even Russia, China and India. It's ridiculous to make any argument against. As consumers it is our right to know--PERIOD. No one should have the power to "decide" otherwise. The thing that is most shocking to me is that people do not truly know what a GMO IS--that these are organisms that would never be able to be produced naturally in nature (or by humankind's hand in the greenhouse or field), they are laboratory combinations of not only different species, but different phylum. These companies are producing "foods" that the human body has not evolved to ingest. These are foreign substances. Since their introduction we have seen all the problems predicted occur--genetic contamination in wild species, death of beneficial pollinators, the need for ever-increased doses of toxic pesticides, superweeds. Furthermore, we have seen a huge increase in certain afflictions. In our children today, known to many as “Generation Rx”:

One in 13 has a food allergy.
One in 68 has autism.
One in 10 suffers from asthma.

Hence, one in three children is afflicted by allergies, asthma, ADHD, or autism.

(This information came from a GMO conference last week, quoted from Robyn O'Brien, expert in this subject.)

I think it is irresponsible of The Independent to be wishy-washy on this one and lazy in its research: it is our right to have properly labeled food.

6 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Sandra Knauf on 10/18/2014 at 8:38 AM

Re: “Petitions launched on stadium question

Ion Cscityhall is either Bach, Cox, or one of their stooges.

8 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by bobdobbs on 10/17/2014 at 6:56 PM

Re: “Proposition 105: GMOs

I amend my previous statement about sulfur to actually

Copper Sulphate…

2 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Steven Alexander Shaver on 10/17/2014 at 5:01 PM

Re: “Petitions launched on stadium question

@ Ion Cscityhall, Sounds like you should move to antarctica.

7 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by radical 1 on 10/17/2014 at 5:00 PM

Re: “Proposition 105: GMOs

The difference between Conventional Corn and RR Corn is 2 amino acids. Also Corn can't reproduce without the help of humans to replant it.

Furthermore, mutations happen in nature all the time. Also "Messing with Mother Nature" is a logical fallacy (Appeal to Nature actually). All the food we eat today are a result of modification through selective breeding, hybridization, mutagenics, transgenics and other subsets of those semi broad categories.

2 likes, 8 dislikes
Posted by Steven Alexander Shaver on 10/17/2014 at 4:07 PM

Re: “Proposition 105: GMOs

The Sierra Club gives another reason to be scared stiff of GE seeds: "Here you are creating millions of novel organisms ... and then releasing them into the environment ... and once released, cannot be recalled or contained. It will not dilute but rather reproduce, disseminate, and mutate. It is unstoppable." ["Radical Medicine" p.179] MUTATE!! Expect new viruses and diseases to result from tampering with Mother Nature.

GE proponents fund the research that says GE foods are OK. GE companies who profit from the sale of GE seeds and products made from them are funding the campaign to prevent labeling. They want an ignorant and compliant public, one that is unaware that GE products come from a laboratory test tube. Our govt won't protect us. We have to protect ourselves. Vote Yes on 105.

4 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by curious on 10/17/2014 at 3:22 PM

Re: “Proposition 105: GMOs

I don't know, why is Vegemite banned in the US? The FDA just banned the importation of certain Bleu Cheeses even.

Hell for a long time Kobe (Not to be confused with "Kobe Style" or "Wagyu" Beef) had been banned in the US because the practices used to produce the beef was against rules and regulations set forth by the FDA. (They've recently allowed a small amount to hit the US markets, but only like .1% of the entire market)

These are all things that are seen as perfectly safe as well. But they're not allowed to be imported into the US.

2 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by Steven Alexander Shaver on 10/17/2014 at 2:54 PM

Re: “Proposition 105: GMOs

"the FDA rescinded its restriction on sales and marketing of tryptophan in February 2001, but continued to ban importation.[42]"

Has Japan not corrected their mfg process in the last 13 years so that the FDA can lift the importation ban? If the process was corrected, why hasn't the importation ban been lifted?

Label GE foods and let the public decide if they want to buy them. Vote Yes on 105.

2 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by curious on 10/17/2014 at 2:38 PM

Re: “Proposition 105: GMOs

Also RoundUp is toxic to WEEDS. Much like how you can consume Chocolate and your dog can't. It's less toxic to humans than Caffeine. Apparently it tastes like soap.

A nice .pdf on it here:…

2 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Steven Alexander Shaver on 10/17/2014 at 2:32 PM

All content © Copyright 2014, The Colorado Springs Independent   |   Website powered by Foundation