Thursday, June 20, 2013
Comment Archives: stories: Columns
Re: “Magpul's next move”
This ignorance of the person that wrote this piece is astounding. But liberals usually think they are thousands of times more intelligent than they actually are.
Posted by
David Johnson
on 03/20/2013 at 11:13 AM
Re: “Council election, two faces of the military”
siggie, you write, "Straight people do not filter through a lens dominated by their sexual preference." Really? Is that why so many straight people are so vehemently opposed to gay marriage? Is that why so many straight people go out of their way to let everyone in the world know, "God hates fags!"
Have you ever considered that the person pointing out your opinions as "phobic" might actually have a point, but the problem is that you dismiss it out of hand, without so much as a second thought, and blithely continue to voice your phobic opinions loudly and often.
Posted by
Mr. K--
on 03/20/2013 at 11:05 AM
Re: “Council election, two faces of the military”
So, Sig, It's all or never with you. Is that it? Why is it you ALWAYS say always to those things and folks you wish to label or ALWAYS say NEVER to those who might disagree. See what I mean, Bub? This black and white world just doesn't exist. Turn off your right wing radio and get to know people for who they really are. Your credibility is shot.
Posted by
longtooth
on 03/20/2013 at 10:16 AM
Re: “Council election, two faces of the military”
Mr. Lloyd: If only people would listen.
Posted by
siggie
on 03/20/2013 at 7:01 AM
Re: “Council election, two faces of the military”
Miz Cathey: I personally couldn't care less if someone is gay or even if they get married. As long as you do not interfere with my rights or the rights of others. However, here is something to consider. Gays only see things through a gay lens. Everything they do, every decision they make, everything they say is filtered through that lens. For example if someone would happen to disagree with you and your opinions they are automatically dubbed "hateful" or "phobic".
Straight people do not filter through a lens dominated by their sexual preference. Why do gays?
Posted by
siggie
on 03/20/2013 at 6:57 AM
Re: “Magpul's next move”
Yeah, me too am big dum dum. Me only get liddle bit of edjamacation at little collij on Charles River in other liberal state, collij called Harvard. Me may be big dum dum with $20,000 truck, but me know enemies foreign and domestic and this guy is definitely the latter. Over the past 227 years there have been lots of people who have helped make this country great and many who have defended (and died) for us. This guy is not only one who does NOT make this country great, he is one of the many who are trying to DESTROY it. Talk about someone who has no education, this guy is the pot calling the kettle black. I do not live in Colorado, but had been in talks with some financial backers about where to set up a new manufacturing operation in related to health and medicine. Central USA is our focus because of the ease with which we will be able to distribute finished products to all corners of the contiguous 48 while having access to good air freight for sales/distribution elsewhere. Guess which state just got bumped off the list, and now Omaha, Wichita, Kansas City and Oklahoma City are now considered and Denver is NOT. Colorado is NOT business friendly. I would not want to expend venture capital in a place that might decide to NEXT, take away the right to assemble or to speak freely. (The adage of killing the Second first, and the First second.
I empathize with people of CALorado not knowing what has hit them, and the rest of us should take note at what can happen when communists are allowed to take over.
Posted by
Jose Smith
on 03/19/2013 at 12:35 AM
Re: “Magpul's next move”
Your an idiot. "I won't bother committing a crime because the laws in place limit the capacity of the magazine for the stolen weapon intended for use are illegal to own".....said no criminal, ever. I stumbled across your blog while searching for magpul parts in a search engine and I'm mortified that you'd even post this. It's safe to assume you don't own a weapon of any kind because in the fluffy, beautiful world you live in they just aren't needed. Just focus on the 200 jobs lost to change the capacity from 30 to 15 which won't stop, impede, or change the outcome of any other tragedy that takes place on American soil because someone goes off grid and commits a horrible act. Making the comparison about magazines and drunk driving.......really? Write about sports or something and stay out of the gun control debate please. You sound like every other anti-gun advocate that neglects the fact that for every shooting rampage that happens there are literally millions of citizens armed to the teeth that are completely peaceful and of no threat to anyone. Lets ban hammers, sling shots, and bowling balls while we are at it.
Posted by
Micah Williams
on 03/18/2013 at 8:25 PM
Re: “Magpul's next move”
WOWW mistar .....u sher did ewz allota big words n thiz herr artacal...to badd imma two simpal to under stand moste of em....i gess ill jus go shoot sum propane tankz out n da wuuds ova yonder way......what a fucking joke this guy is? balls....remember when most guys had them?
Posted by
Braxton Sloas
on 03/18/2013 at 2:21 PM
Re: “Playboy boss Scott Flanders loses Freedom”
Sounds like a certain screed-spewing, no-talent hack is jealous.
Posted by
Stacy in Woodland Park
on 03/18/2013 at 12:15 PM
Re: “Magpul's next move”
Senator Feinstein made fun of citizens armed with bazookas...but that is exactly what the 2nd amendment is all about, keeping the government in check by an armed citizenry.
Not only do we need bazookas and automatic weapons, we need fighter jets and helicopter gun ships, surface to air missiles and nerve gas to fend off Obama's ultimate assault on us.
Posted by
TejonTech
on 03/16/2013 at 4:22 PM
Re: “Magpul's next move”
How do you liberals constantly get away with blatantly lying? First, a AR15 was not used in Newtown contrary to endless repetitious false reporting by you folks with a agenda. Second, as others have stated, 30 round magazines were not used in other mass shootings you aledge.
It's getting really old listening to the constant beeping from liberal robots like yourself who obviously are ingorant of facts and are even more philosophically challenged.
Posted by
thejtiggidy
on 03/16/2013 at 2:04 PM
Re: “Chuck Baker's carpet ride”
Chuck is BACK ON THE AIR on 1040 AM on Friday afternoons - go listen to him!
Posted by
Publisherpikespeakregionlivingmagazine
on 03/15/2013 at 4:56 PM
Re: “Playboy boss Scott Flanders loses Freedom”
dear fdohlin: Everyone used to work at the Gazette.
RR
Posted by
tosches
on 03/15/2013 at 9:18 AM
Re: “Playboy boss Scott Flanders loses Freedom”
RR; You used to "work" at the Gazette didn't you?
Posted by
fdohlin
on 03/14/2013 at 5:53 PM
Re: “Campaign contributions, the city attorney and gun law”
So, Erik, if we gave you the raise, would you take the job?
Posted by
siggie
on 03/13/2013 at 4:03 PM
Re: “Campaign contributions, the city attorney and gun law”
stigma, i believe the point is that money should not be poured into an election in an attempt to buy the outcome. this was seen in the last election due to the citizens united supreme court of activists ruling. millions and millions of dollars used to mis-inform the low info voters... thankfully unsuccessfully. the republiklans around here don't seem to care because it has come only from their side. elections shouldn't be determined by who has the most money.
Posted by
happyfew
on 03/13/2013 at 3:49 PM
Re: “Of builders and bygones”
The KEY line in the article is this one, from our city fathers a century ago:
"...Good government attracts population and capital, bad government repels."
'nuff said, now we know where our problems lie....time to vote out the GOP failures....
Posted by
OldCrank
on 03/13/2013 at 1:09 PM
Re: “Campaign contributions, the city attorney and gun law”
Well gosh darn it Mr. Heimsoth, who could have ever imagined that an entity would contribute to a political candidate that had their interests at heart. It is simply unheard of. How dare they.
Posted by
siggie
on 03/13/2013 at 8:44 AM
Re: “Of builders and bygones”
Sage: not sure I'm seeing what you're seeing, but I did enjoy the somewhat oblique reference to one of my all time favorite movies.
Posted by
siggie
on 03/13/2013 at 8:39 AM
Re: “Council election, two faces of the military”
K--we are are opposed to perverting a God established institution that is the foundation and central building block of civilization...it is that simple.
It is the gays who have forced the issue, not us. But once on the table we need to standup against the destruction of society that they are advocating.
Homosexuality is a bizarre disorder that needs empathy and understanding like any disorder, but also it needs boundaries, treatment, and to be recognized for what it truly is...disordered and pathetic affection.