Marijuana

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Manitou maintains limit on marijuana dispensaries

Posted By on Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 3:34 PM

Emerald Fields is one of two recreational dispensaries licensed to operate in Manitou Springs. - FAITH MILLER
  • Faith Miller
  • Emerald Fields is one of two recreational dispensaries licensed to operate in Manitou Springs.

UPDATE: Manitou Springs City Council voted 6-1 in favor of the resolution affirming the city's two-dispensary limit. Councilor Becky Elder was opposed.

———————————ORIGINAL POST 3:34 P.M. TUES., FEB. 13, 2019———————————

After months of negotiations between a nonprofit advocacy group and city officials over the possibility of adding more recreational marijuana dispensaries, Manitou Springs City Council will consider a resolution that would effectively cut off the discussion — and reaffirm the city’s two-store limit on pot shops.

The possibility of raising the limit to three or four dispensaries was first brought by the Southern Colorado Cannabis Council, which approached the mayor in October. Jason Warf, the Cannabis Council’s executive director, says he began the months-long discussion process after someone approached him about wanting to open a marijuana business in Manitou Springs. Currently, Manitou allows just two recreational licenses in city limits, held by Maggie's Farm and Emerald Fields.

Warf says that discussions with the mayor and City Council had looked like they could lead to a compromise between the city and the cannabis industry stakeholders he represented. Possibilities had included an equity program that could benefit women and minorities who applied for licenses.

However, at the Feb. 5 regular meeting, Councilors Susan Wolbrueck and Bob Todd expressed a desire for a special meeting to reaffirm the city's support of a two-store limit, the Pikes Peak Bulletin reported. Manitou Springs Mayor Ken Jaray scheduled the meeting for Feb. 12 — and based on what appears to be widespread opposition to raising the limit among City Councilors, Warf says he'd be surprised if the resolution doesn't pass.

Warf found the city's decision to cut off the discussion "mind-boggling."

"They’re looking at an ordinance to say that they don’t want to pass an ordinance," Warf says. "...That seems like a huge waste of time and rather redundant. And not a great use of taxpayer money."

Jaray concedes that he "was not in favor of the timing of the resolution," but says he supports keeping the two-store limit based on feedback from residents who opposed adding more dispensaries.

"I probably would not have taken up the resolution at this point," he says, "but if a majority of the Council wants to do that then I'm more than willing to have the conversation."

Jaray says community responses to posts on Facebook and NextDoor, a neighborhood social network, about the possibility of raising the limit were overwhelmingly negative: "I haven’t heard [positive feedback] from anybody other than the Cannabis Council and one woman who's wanted to have a license."

Warf argues that he's received emails and phone calls expressing support for a higher limit.

"City Council is claiming ... the proponents haven't provided that input, and the reason there is because we hadn’t gotten to that point in the timeline," Warf says. "I see some disingenuousness from the city saying that, but then sort of rushing through this process without any public input to determine from their constituents that they don't want to move forward on a compromise."

Warf says a group of cannabis business owners plan to seek a special election to have voters decide whether the city needs more dispensaries. The Cannabis Council will not be involved in the signature gathering, but he says it will likely support such a ballot initiative, depending on the exact language.

The group plans to start polling voters and collecting signatures in the near future, Warf says.

Councilor Ward pointed out in a file:///Users/nat/Downloads/Agenda_2019_2_12_Meeting(223)%20(1).pdf" target="_blank">memorandum addressed to City Council that a special election would cost taxpayers between $15,000 and $20,000.

The special meeting is scheduled for Feb. 12 at 9 p.m. in City Hall, 606 Manitou Avenue. Also on the agenda: An update on the relocation of three Pikes Peak Cog Railway cars.

Read the full resolution here:

  • Favorite

Tags: , , , , , ,

Thursday, January 4, 2018

Sessions to open door for marijuana crackdown

Posted By on Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 1:56 PM

senate_judiciary_committee_chairman_sen._jeff_sessions_r-al.jpg

UPDATE: U.S. Attorney Bob Troyer of Colorado's District has now responded to the new guidance on marijuana enforcement. He released this vague statement:

Today the Attorney General rescinded the Cole Memo on marijuana prosecutions, and directed that federal marijuana prosecution decisions be governed by the same principles that have long governed all of our prosecution decisions. The United States Attorney’s Office in Colorado has already been guided by these principles in marijuana prosecutions — focusing in particular on identifying and prosecuting those who create the greatest safety threats to our communities around the state.  We will, consistent with the Attorney General’s latest guidance, continue to take this approach in all of our work with our law enforcement partners throughout Colorado.

What we still don't know is whether Troyer, who replaced former U.S. Attorney John Walsh in August 2016 and was then officially appointed by U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions in November, believes, like Sessions apparently does, that the use, possession and distribution of marijuana represents one of "the greatest safety threats to our communities."

——ORIGINAL POST: 11:08 A.M. THURS. JAN. 4——

After about a year of wondering “will he or won’t he?” it appears the answer is: “He will.”

As of Jan. 4, multiple news outlets reported that U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions intends to rescind an important Obama era drug enforcement policy known as the Cole Memo. The Cole Memo, named for then-Deputy Attorney General James Cole, was issued in 2013, after voters in Colorado and Washington approved measures legalizing marijuana for recreational use. It was meant to address the conflict with federal law, which still holds that marijuana is a Schedule I substance (meaning, highly addictive with no medical benefit).

Sent to federal prosecutors in the relevant states, the memo set out guidance for their prosecution of marijuana-related crimes. "The [Department of Justice is] committed to using its limited investigative and prosecutorial resources to address the most significant threats in the most effective, consistent and rational way," it stated. Therefore, the DOJ would expect state and local authorities to police health and safety issues through a robust regulatory system while it would reserve its own resources for priority cases like sale to minors, interstate diversion and gang activity.

The Cole Memo created an environment that let state regulators, cannabis businesses and consumers feel comfortable partaking of the state-legalized substance, knowing that if they basically followed the rules, they had nothing to worry about. It encouraged investment and growth. In Colorado, the recreational side of the industry brings in over a billion dollars in sales annually, supporting tens of thousands of jobs and millions in tax revenue for schools, law enforcement and addiction treatment.

That environment is about to change. It doesn't necessarily mean that federal agents are about to swoop into the six states that have legalized, wiping everything out and sending everyone to prison. But it does mean renewed uncertainty about the status of legalized weed.

Here's Sessions' new memo, via Politico.
We've put in a call to the U.S. Attorney's office in Colorado to see how its attorneys are thinking of the policy change and will report back when we hear something.

In the meantime, industry players, advocates and elected officials are responding.

The Southern Colorado Cannabis Council, a group that advocates for patients, posted a statement saying they're prepared to "stand up" to Sessions.

Sal Pace, the Democratic County Commissioner from Pueblo said this in a statement: "A reversal of the sovereign voice of the American public is an assault on the intellect of Americans, an assault on the fundamental tenants of democracy, and an attack on the Constitutional guarantee of states’ rights."

Colorado's U.S. Sen. Cory Gardner put this statement out:

Reports that the Justice Department will rescind their current policy on legal marijuana enforcement are extremely alarming. Before I voted to confirm Attorney General Sessions, he assured me that marijuana would not be a priority for this Administration. Today’s action directly contradicts what I was told, and I am prepared to take all steps necessary, including holding DOJ nominees, until the Attorney General lives up to the commitment he made to me prior to his confirmation. In 2016, President Trump said marijuana legalization should be left up to the states and I agree.

Colorado's  U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet, on Twitter, wrote: "In rescinding the Cole memo, the Attorney General failed to listen to Colorado, and will create unnecessary chaos and confusion."
  • Favorite

Tags: , , , , , ,

Recent Comments

All content © Copyright 2019, The Colorado Springs Independent

Website powered by Foundation