Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range
    • From:

      To:


Comment Archives: stories: News: Noted

Re: “Panhandling, dropouts and weed-delivery bust

Keith King and Jim Bensberg really are the old failed school of thinking in Colorado Springs...they are both past their expiration date and need to step aside. We need fresh ideas and a youthful face, rather than a clown's face for our city.

Posted by TejonTech on 02/26/2013 at 1:23 PM

Re: “Noted: City Council pay, Personhood bill, GIVE! results

City Council Members,

We are proposing that at your next Formal Meeting that the ballot proposal for City Council Compensation (voted on and approved by a 5-4 vote January 22, 2013) be brought forth for reconsideration for the following reasons.

1.) The presenters of this ballot proposal (young professionals) made strong statements that they could not participate in running for City Council unless the compensation was increased to $48,000.00+ per year. This number appears to be a very arbitrary number as it cannot be a single source of income for a young family with a mortgage. Their after tax take home pay would be approximately $36,000.00 per year. Aside from that there have been over the years thousands of free hours given by this City's Citizens on committee's and commissions paying for their own fuel, parking and supplies, adjusting their employment schedules in order to serve when asked by Council and others. Yes, it can be very costly to serve, but we all new and accepted the terms and conditions when we accepted the invitation to serve, whether it be Council or a committee for this City.

2.) A full review of City charter was ask for in order to bring it into the 21st Century, This review could have a dramatic change on the responsibilities (adding to or deleting from) of the City Council and it's expected duties.

3.) After the City Charter review, City Council may not longer be the Utility Board and if that happens how will that new Utility Board be paid and how much? Should both the City Council and the new Utility Board be paid the same while they serve or will the pay differ and if so for what reason?

4.) This ballot proposal is being perceived that it is from the City Council asking for a raise and not the Young Professional group that asked for it. They did not have to collect, verify and submit the 25,000 signatures from the citizens of Colorado Springs to the City Clerk in order to place it on the ballot as a citizen sponsored initiative. Their position and desire for higher pay for City Council was not well explained to the public while while they did so (re; the Strong Mayor Ballot issue).

5.) Ralph Braden said it very well, that he felt that this would be in jeopardy of failure (increase in Council pay) if placed on the ballot at this time in this manner. We agree with him fully after listening to the radio today (KVOR Richard Randall) there are many citizens who are already against this proposal for the reasons mentioned above and more.

We are supportive of a reasonable raise in the pay (stipend) for City Council, but only after a City Charter review has been completed and the recommendations have come forth from those chosen to review it, supported by facts and presented to the Citizens with honesty and transparency in the media and town hall meetings. Please consider that if this measure fails in April in may be very hard to resurrect it again in the very near future. President Hente, you said before your swing vote, "if not now, then when" The not now is before a complete charter review for the 21st century has been submitted and the when is after the new City Council has approved those changes and it has been presented to the voters properly.

Once again, we encourage you to call up this Ballot Proposal in the next formal meeting and call for a vote for reconsideration, we pray for a short postponement to bring this forth in a manner that the citizens will vote for in a positive way.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Paul Kleinschmidt on 01/31/2013 at 9:15 AM

Re: “Noted: City Council pay, Personhood bill, GIVE! results

Serving on the city council is not a job. It is a public service. You should be compensated for your expenses, not your time.

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by UCanSeeClearlyNow on 01/30/2013 at 6:27 AM

Re: “Noted: City, PERA gets court date

Now that we know the HBA endorsements we know who to vote against. Leigh being investigated shows the type of unethical and puppet individuals the HBA endorses. Dougan should be investigated as well.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by louiet on 01/26/2013 at 10:50 AM

Re: “Noted: City, PERA gets court date

Good to know Nuemann has a heart...I thought he was cold bloodied money grabber.

The city's argument about owing people their pensions, however inflated they are, is a bogus position given they forced the employees into "leaving".

Although all these para-government employees ought to have to wait until they are 65 like the rest of us, and not double dip by getting a PERA pension while still doing the same job they were doing before.

Posted by TejonTech on 01/26/2013 at 8:33 AM

Re: “Noted: Possible school closures

Lameborn is an embarassment.

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Lalahartma on 12/28/2012 at 1:36 PM

Re: “Noted: Possible school closures

I'd like to read what Lamborn has to say about gun control, NRA and the Newtown shooting.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Brian Scott on 12/26/2012 at 7:44 AM

Re: “Noted: Council delays drill vote

RE: Klingenschmitt v Weinstein, it would appear the erstwhile chaplain (I keep wanting to type 'charlatan') has lost faith in his god's justice and is looking for help in the secular world... or maybe he's just looking for a juicy settlement.

Hope he's not holding he breath! What he's likely to get from Mikey will probably be aimed toward his back pocket but it won't fit into his wallet...

Posted by Rael Nidess on 12/14/2012 at 7:22 PM

Re: “Noted: Costs of the Carrier case

The cops can't return the mj because they already smoked it all...

1 like, 1 dislike
Posted by TejonTech on 11/11/2012 at 1:04 PM

Re: “Noted: Costs of the Carrier case

I guess the city doesn't know the rest of us don't get raises because government makes doing business too expensive...this is an insult,mso insult a government employee the next time you see one to event he score.

2 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by TejonTech on 11/10/2012 at 2:45 PM

Re: “Noted: Outsiders' view of downtown

Are there any taxpayer's funds involved in the secular religion center at AFA? It seems there ought to be some separation here of indoctrination and state.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by TejonTech on 10/23/2012 at 10:20 PM

Re: “Noted: Outsiders' view of downtown

$150,000 to hear we ought to change the name of the America the Beautiful Park?

Bad idea...that is far more related to our history and identity than the Olympics. And a wall for names of Olympian? When they get accused of doping will they have to be scraped off?

I think we need to ask for our money back.

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by TejonTech on 10/23/2012 at 3:25 PM

Re: “Noted: Outsiders' view of downtown

I'm curious, who were the outsiders in the story headline?

Posted by Scott Batson on 10/19/2012 at 1:27 PM

Re: “Noted: Utilities proposes rate hike

"Better block" was a waste of time and money; a bunch of hay bales and horse troughs put in parking spaces with some shrubs in their pots blocking side walks; stupid to the max, nothing actually proved or disproved.

The fact is that the street is far to wide, and there are only shops on one side of the street, so nothing to which to connect.

And then without study, citizen input, or for any particular or obvious reason, Nevada is being torn up to put in dividers and plantings, when last year all the grass and trees died because the city couldn't afford to water them..and now in the middle of a drought, economic and moisture, this project.

All of which has to do with people spending our money out of their own unemployed boredom.

2 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by TejonTech on 10/12/2012 at 8:12 PM

Re: “Noted: Utilities proposes rate hike

In case you missed Better Block Pikes Peak, find the story in images here: https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.…

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Jana Bussanich on 10/10/2012 at 10:10 AM

Re: “Noted: "A new beginning" starts for Memorial

Hey "CH" check out Tony Exum's website. Pictures of Firefighters with title underneath pic, constitute the government endorsing Tony? Pictures of Citizen's Project with their title underneath - supposedly a non-profit - could be an endorsement for Tony? Why don't you check out your Democrat candidates with the same scrutiny? Possible journalist bias?

1 like, 1 dislike
Posted by Theresa Null on 10/08/2012 at 7:33 PM

Re: “Noted: "A new beginning" starts for Memorial

hopefully the churches will see their tax free status taken away if they want to inject religion into politics. come on irs.... do it, the separation must be up held.

2 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Daytripper on 10/03/2012 at 11:05 AM

Re: “Noted: "A new beginning" starts for Memorial

Please, world ... never say "new beginning." Is it possible to have an 'old beginning?' No!

0 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by robert e howard is YOUR god on 10/03/2012 at 10:09 AM

Re: “Noted: 60 Minutes probes the city

Two comments to the USAFA Climate Survey. (1) This climate survey is most probably valid IF the 15% of the 4000+ cadets who responded were randomly selected from the total population. We don't know the sampling procedures USAFA used, so as yet all I can say is I can't draw any firm conclusions from what the academy claims, and (2) Attitude surveys such as USAFA's are notoriously weak predictors of job satisfaction, typically explaining only 15% of the total picture -- in other words, an attitude survey is better than random guessing, but just barely. Fred Malmstrom, USAFA '64

1 like, 1 dislike
Posted by Academy Graduate on 09/20/2012 at 12:08 PM

Re: “Noted: Council takes on drilling regs

I would like to call for a change in the fire chief who decided the feds could take of the national forest and he would take care of the fire within city limits, resulting in 345 homes being destroyed because of misallocated resources, and of equal interest, no federal funds being given the city to cover the costs because the chief refused to come under the leadership/direction of the feds.

And what of those monies given to help fire victims...they are being dispersed in canned food and vegetables on Fridays to those who can prove they lost their homes in the fire or were evacuated...those who lost their homes don't by definition have kitchens to prepare their fresh vegetables, and those who were merely evacuated are back home with little disruption.

How much better that money be used to help families cover expenses, even upside down mortgages, than be dribbled out in canned beets and rice.

And has anyone tried to borrow money from our Obama administration over regulated banks...many of these fire victims are going to have enough insurance money to pay off mortgages, but never qualify for a loan large enough to replace a house with new code compliance.



1 like, 1 dislike
Posted by TejonTech on 09/10/2012 at 11:05 AM

Today | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun
Geeks Who Drink Pub Quiz

Geeks Who Drink Pub Quiz @ Rocks Sports Bar & Grill

Mondays, 8-10 p.m. Continues through March 26

All of today's events | Staff Picks

All content © Copyright 2017, The Colorado Springs Independent

Website powered by Foundation