scubafox 
Member since Nov 11, 2008


Custom Lists

  • Zip.

Stats

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »
RegionName: Northwest
OtherArea: 719

Recent Comments

Re: “Reader: Why not choose clean, sustainable energy anyways?

Mr Rocky Smith. Regarding your statement: "COST! First there is no money. Yes they could raise the price of elect. service but that puts more of a problem on consumers and many cant afford it now."

The *cost* to the public doesn't go away because it's not directly paid for. The public pays by the effects of pollution on public health ... who pays that? And also there's the cost of, yes despite rampant denial, the VERY REAL effects of Global Warming that's an Existential Threat to Life on Earth. What's that worth to you. Google, "The Physics of Global Warming" Powell.

You reveal yourself to be the "other kind of socialist" ... the "cost redistribution" kind of socialist. Yes, you're a socialist ... the kind you love.

Plus, costs documented at whitehouse.gov are passed onto the public to the tune of:

Production Fossil Fuel Subsidies $4.7 B / year.

There are a number of tax preferences, described below, available in the United States to producers of fossil fuels. The preferences below are all permanent provisions in the tax code. The annual revenue costs estimated for each provision are taken from the Mid-Session Review of the Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2015, which is available here: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/msr.

Provision descriptions are derived from the General Explanation of the Administrations Revenue Proposal, sometimes referred to as the Treasury Green Book, which is available here: http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/ta…

In total, the United States government has identified eleven Federal fossil fuel production tax provisions, as shown below. Combined, these provisions total USD 4.7 billion in annual revenue cost (nominal annual average figure based on the 10-year revenue estimate). The provisions are listed in order of greatest annual revenue cost to least.

https://www.treasury.gov/open/Documents/US…

4 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by scubafox on 06/15/2017 at 1:20 PM

Re: “Mayor John Suthers warns against 'sanctuary city' policy, Green party pushes ahead

Mr. Suthers should know that ICE can come in to *any* part of the nation, period. There is *no* "sanctuary" from that.

What right-wing racists want is to appropriate city and state resources to carry out a federal function. That is the kind of thing "conservatives" have called an "unfunded mandate" on other issues. But not on this.

It is destructive because this war on law-abiding immigrants will increase crime because crimes won't be reported by those who fear police will reported them to ICE.

Besides, the U.S. farm policies and NAFTA *created* the illegal immigration problem by wrecking the livelihood of millions of Latin Americans. See "How NAFTA and Farm Policy Subsidies Created the Illegal Immigration Problem"
http://www.exponentialimprovement.com/cms/…

2 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by scubafox on 05/05/2017 at 11:57 AM

Re: “Initiative 2C, Ask a Mexican, Manitou schools, and more

When submitting a letter, one agrees for it to be edited. I'm happy they printed what they did.

Posted by scubafox on 11/01/2015 at 5:05 PM

Re: “Colorado Springs' turn to wake up

If 2C fails it will almost certainly be for the wrong reason (being anti-tax). If it passes it will be because of ignoring why it should fail (not taxing developers and growth). http://www.exponentialimprovement.com/cms/…

6 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by scubafox on 11/01/2015 at 1:40 PM

Re: “Initiative 2C, Ask a Mexican, Manitou schools, and more

My letter above on "Different opposition" was highly edited for space and, it appears, political reasons. See it all at "Oppose 2C sales tax increase: Pay for Past Sins; Sin No More". http://www.exponentialimprovement.com/cms/…

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by scubafox on 11/01/2015 at 1:31 PM

Re: “'Fluff' news, safe and clean parks, pot and the press, and more

Mr. Carmody: They're not trying "to squash people who disagree with their ideas," rather to be treated as humans who should get the same service as everyone else, regardless of the beliefs of whoever owns the business. You've got the KKK analogy exactly backwards; the KKK also denied service to some types of humans and went to the extreme of denying those types the right to live. Christians similarly attack those who are LGBT.

10 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by scubafox on 04/08/2015 at 1:46 PM

Re: “'Fluff' news, safe and clean parks, pot and the press, and more

John Wark's letter of denial is one to which I also objected. Here's mine:
At current emissions rates, CO2 is released into the atmosphere nearly twice as fast as it’s removed. Our "atmospheric bathtub" is filling with CO2. We must stop and reverse this because, at current CO2 levels, more energy is absorbed from the sun than is emitted back into space. That's why the planet is warming and regional climates are changing! To prevent further warming we must cut CO2 emissions at least in half, not just halt increases. Despite flawed "common sense" thinking used by global warming deniers, global warming is an existential threat to life on earth. Billions will die, more species extinct. The physics of the system tells us that waiting for "direct, incontrovertible" proof sufficient to convince deniers is not an option. More on this: http://www.exponentialimprovement.com/cms/…

8 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by scubafox on 04/08/2015 at 1:38 PM

All Comments »


Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

All content © Copyright 2017, The Colorado Springs Independent

Website powered by Foundation